U.S. Foreign Policy: Imperialism, Isolationism, and Intervention

Introduction

The annexation of Hawaii in 1898 stands as a significant episode in the history of U.S. imperialism. Prior to this event, the United States had harbored ambitions of expanding its territories by annexing smaller nations. While earlier attempts at imperialism were not entirely successful, the annexation of Hawaii marked a turning point. Imperialism, in this context, refers to the exertion of U.S. power to coerce and annex a smaller nation for strategic and economic gains.

Imperialism Unveiled: The Annexation of Hawaii

The annexation of Hawaii commenced as a seemingly peaceful agreement between the United States and the Queen of Hawaii, allowing American citizens to settle in the islands.

However, the U.S. soon recognized Hawaii's strategic significance for establishing navy bases in the Pacific. This realization led to a shift from peaceful negotiations to coercive tactics. The U.S. government threatened the Queen of Hawaii, compelling her to relinquish her islands under the implicit threat of death. Two years after this annexation, Hawaii officially became U.S.

Get quality help now
writer-Charlotte
writer-Charlotte
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Hawaii

star star star star 4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

territory.

This imperialistic move by the United States illustrates a blatant exercise of power and dominance over a smaller nation. It reflects a pursuit of national interests at the expense of the sovereignty of Hawaii. The annexation of Hawaii showcases the darker side of imperialism, where a powerful nation exploits its strength to fulfill its economic and strategic objectives on the global stage.

Isolationism Prevails: U.S. Declines Aid to Hungarian Patriots

Contrary to the imperialistic tendencies displayed in the annexation of Hawaii, the United States exhibited isolationist policies by refusing to aid Hungarian patriots in 1849. Isolationism, in this context, refers to the U.S.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

reluctance to engage with other nations in significant ways. In 1849, despite the plea for assistance from Hungarian leaders seeking support against oppressive regimes, the United States opted for minimal involvement.

The U.S. prioritized internal matters, concentrating on the expansion of the nation in the West and pursuing the Manifest Destiny—a concept centered around expanding U.S. territory from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. The decision not to aid Hungarian patriots underscored the nation's commitment to focusing on domestic concerns and avoiding entanglements in global affairs. The United States, during this period, sought to establish and consolidate its identity and territory without undue interference from international matters.

Interventionism at Play: U.S. Mediation in the Venezuela-Great Britain Dispute

The attempt by the United States to mediate in the Venezuela-Great Britain dispute in 1895 reveals an instance of interventionism—a departure from strict isolationist policies. The conflict between Venezuela and Great Britain emerged in 1841, primarily over disputed territories and land ownership. The tension escalated when gold was discovered in the contested region, prompting increased British efforts to expand their territorial claims.

After 19 years of Venezuelan appeals for assistance, the U.S. finally intervened. Leveraging diplomatic pressure and invoking the Monroe Doctrine—a policy discouraging European intervention in the Americas—the United States demanded that Britain cease its conflict with Venezuela. Although Britain initially responded mockingly to the Monroe Doctrine, U.S. intervention played a pivotal role in intimidating Britain out of the dispute and aiding Venezuela.

This interventionist approach demonstrated a departure from the isolationist stance observed during the Hungarian patriots' plea. The U.S., driven by a mix of geopolitical considerations and diplomatic principles, actively engaged in mediating a conflict that extended beyond its borders.

Conclusion: A Complex Tapestry of U.S. Foreign Policy

The annexation of Hawaii, the refusal to aid Hungarian patriots, and the intervention in the Venezuela-Great Britain dispute collectively form a complex tapestry of U.S. foreign policy. These historical events underscore the intricate balance between imperialism, isolationism, and interventionism in shaping the nation's approach to global affairs. Understanding these nuances is essential for unraveling the complexities of U.S. foreign relations throughout history.

Updated: Oct 10, 2024
Cite this page

U.S. Foreign Policy: Imperialism, Isolationism, and Intervention. (2016, Sep 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/isolationism-intervention-and-imperialism-essay

U.S. Foreign Policy: Imperialism, Isolationism, and Intervention essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment