Lingering Threats: Linnea Saukko's "How to Poison the Earth" Free Essay Example

To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”

Strategic Methods: Cause and Effect in Poisoning Earth

Saukko strategically employs cause-and-effect modes in the opening paragraph, infusing elements of sarcasm to engage the reader in contemplating the literal consequences of poisoning the earth. The author categorizes the primary methods of environmental degradation, emphasizing the importance of toxic chemicals like uranium-238, plutonium, PCB, and DDT.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ Lingering Threats: Linnea Saukko’s “How to Poison the Earth” ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

This serves as the groundwork for her persuasive argument, laying the foundation for the impending discussion on the ramifications of such poisoning.

In the subsequent paragraphs, Saukko delves into the classification of pollution, particularly through deep-well and shallow-well injections, and dumping. The former, as she notes, ensures the poisoning of the earth to its core, while the latter contaminates groundwater aquifers.

The interconnectedness of these methods becomes apparent as Saukko persuasively contends that the convergence of toxic chemicals and improper waste disposal will lead to the earth's deterioration.

Cascading Effects: The Path of Pesticides to Water Bodies

Expanding on her cause-and-effect approach, Saukko elucidates the journey of pesticides and poisons into lakes, rivers, and oceans. She astutely highlights the relationship between plants absorbing pesticides and the subsequent contamination of groundwater. Sarcasm permeates her narrative as she ironically emphasizes the importance of contaminating surface water, positing that it transports poisons to otherwise uncontaminable areas.

The intricate web of cause and effect becomes evident, with Saukko stressing the significance of poisoning groundwater to ensure the pollution of lakes.

The narrative extends to the challenges posed by rivers, acting as natural filters. Saukko identifies the dilemma where rivers, while cleansing water, become conduits for pollutants. This nuanced exploration underscores the complexity of environmental threats and the intricate balance required in addressing them.

Unraveling the Atmosphere: From Oceans to Air

The essay's later paragraphs unravel the impact on oceans and the atmosphere. Saukko introduces the concept of oceans as a natural buffer for toxins, indicating that direct dumping disrupts this balance. The persuasive thread continues as she elucidates the cascading effects, emphasizing the transport of toxins to unreachable places. The seventh paragraph extends the discussion to air transportation, where cause and effect play a pivotal role in the creation of acid rain through combustion and evaporation.

Saukko's exploration of acid rain and its limited impact on lakes and living organisms adds a layer of complexity. Her argument takes an unexpected turn as she introduces the notion of exploding nuclear test bombs to counteract the atmosphere's self-cleansing ability. This grim proposal, presented with an air of inevitability, adds a chilling dimension to the essay's overall persuasive strategy.

Conclusion: A Call to Awareness and Action

Linnea Saukko's essay, while initially appearing to advocate for environmental harm, strategically transforms into a call for awareness and action. Through the adept use of persuasive techniques and a comprehensive exploration of poisoning methods, Saukko implores readers to recognize the potential consequences of human activities. The essay, far from promoting destruction, serves as a cautionary tale, urging society to adopt measures to prevent the poisoning of the earth.

In essence, Saukko navigates the complexities of environmental threats, offering a compelling narrative that balances persuasion with informative elements. The essay challenges readers to reflect on their roles in preserving the planet and serves as a clarion call for responsible environmental stewardship. As we unravel the layers of Saukko's discourse, it becomes evident that the true purpose is not to endorse destruction but to inspire proactive measures for a sustainable future.