The Gender Gap in Communication Between Men and Women

Communication styles between men and women have long been a subject of fascination and discussion, with disparities evident from early childhood. As John Gottman astutely observes, "Boys learn to suppress and bury their feelings, especially fear and other emotions that make them feel vulnerable. Girls, on the other hand, are encouraged to express and talk about their feelings". This fundamental divergence serves as a foundation for a lifetime of distinct communication habits, each shaped by a combination of biological, societal, and environmental factors.

Childhood Upbringing

The roots of communication disparities are planted in infancy, where even subtle differences in parental treatment emerge. Lathrop's research sheds light on this, indicating that "boy and girl infants are treated differently by both parents. Both mom and dad speak louder voices to boys, caress and coo at girls more, show greater facial disapproval to girls’ anger, and use more aggressive physical play with boys". These early experiences set the stage for the development of communication styles, laying the groundwork for how individuals will navigate social interactions in the future.

Get quality help now

KarrieWrites

Verified writer

Proficient in: Communication

5 (339)

“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

It's crucial to recognize that these distinctions are not merely biological but are socially constructed. Society imparts expectations regarding how boys and girls should behave, influencing parental approaches to upbringing. Boys are often taught to be resilient and stoic, suppressing emotions deemed vulnerable, while girls are encouraged to be expressive and open about their feelings.

Problem Solving vs. Emotional Expression

The disparities in communication education become more pronounced as children grow. Lathrop's insight that "boys are not taught skills relating to intimacy and emotions while girls are carefully taught to focus primarily on these" highlights the gendered nature of communication teachings.

However, it's essential to understand that these teachings are not set in stone; rather, they are influenced by parental modeling of 'correct' behavior.

Boys, by nature or nurture, tend to adopt a problem-solving approach in their communication. Marlene Lathrop notes, "Boys develop visual-spatial-logical and problem-solving skills sooner than girls and tend to talk about things and activities". This inclination to discuss practical matters and activities becomes a defining aspect of male communication. In contrast, girls develop talking-reading-vocabulary and interpersonal skills earlier, leading them to focus on people, emotions, and developing friendships.

While these patterns are observed on a general scale, it's important to recognize the influence of individual upbringing. Parental guidance plays a significant role in shaping a child's communication style, as families may adhere to or deviate from societal norms.

Non-verbal Communication

Non-verbal communication serves as a critical layer in understanding the nuanced differences in how men and women interact. Notably, men and women exhibit distinctive body language cues, with eye contact being a significant factor.

During disagreements, men often avoid direct eye contact. Tonya Reiman emphasizes this, stating that "for men, a face-to-face position indicates challenge or confrontation". Understanding this aversion to direct eye contact provides insights into how men interpret confrontation, perceiving it as a threat.

Interestingly, studies suggest that the choice of the argument location can influence communication dynamics. The car, devoid of direct eye contact, becomes a preferred setting. This aligns with Reiman's assertion that "women are considered to be more nonverbally warmer than men with a tendency to smile and lean towards others during conversation". These nuances underscore the importance of recognizing and adapting to non-verbal cues to enhance effective communication between genders.

Touch and Expression

The roots of non-verbal communication, particularly touch and expression, can be traced back to childhood experiences. Reiman notes, "In the first few years of life, girls are more used to physical touch by their mothers during childhood compared with boys. Women, therefore, use touch to express caring, empathy, and emotions. Men are seen as being more competitive and verbally assertive due to childhood influences of toys such as guns and swords".

This divergence in the perception of touch and expression highlights the impact of societal expectations embedded in childhood norms. While women may employ touch as a means of expressing emotions, men may manifest competitiveness and assertiveness in their verbal communication, influenced by early exposure to certain types of toys.

Communication in Relationships

Communication styles extend their influence into the realm of relationships, further complicating the interplay between men and women. Deborah Tannen's exploration in her book "You Just Don't Understand" delves into the dichotomy of how troubles are shared.

Tannen elucidates how women view talking about troubles as the essence of connection, a concept she terms "troubles talk." This involves sharing personal challenges, fostering a sense of intimacy. However, men often interpret this as a request for advice, responding with solutions. The resultant misalignment in expectations may lead to the perception that a woman's concerns are dismissed, as Tannen notes, "When a man offers this 'here’s a solution' to a woman, it becomes as though the man is dismissing her and all things that she has previously said had no importance to him whatsoever."

Understanding these differing approaches to sharing troubles is crucial in navigating the intricacies of communication in relationships. While women seek connection through shared experiences and emotions, men may view the same situation as an opportunity to provide solutions, unintentionally undermining the emotional depth of the conversation.

Communication Styles Overview

Tonya Reiman provides a succinct encapsulation of the core issue, stating, "The communication style of women has been described as being more emotional than men. Women focus on feelings and building relationships while men focus on power and status". These styles, deeply ingrained from childhood, result in women's emotional richness contrasting with men's assertive and direct communication style.

Men, motivated by achieving social status and avoiding failure, communicate to report, while women seek rapport, using conversation as a means of personal connection and to avoid social isolation. This distinction is further expounded by Tannen, who highlights that men often find themselves perplexed by women's utilization of conversation for intimacy, interpreting it as "troubles talk."

The clash in communication styles is not a testament to one being superior or inferior; rather, it underscores the diversity in how individuals approach communication. Men and women may express themselves differently, but fostering an understanding and appreciation for these differences can lead to more effective and meaningful interactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the communication styles of men and women, shaped by upbringing, societal expectations, and biological factors, offer a lens through which we can better understand the dynamics of human interaction. The societal norm of teaching men to internalize their feelings may inadvertently hinder effective communication, requiring a nuanced approach to foster healthier communication patterns.

Recognizing and appreciating these differences can pave the way for more meaningful interactions between genders. It's not about reshaping individuals but rather fostering an environment where diverse communication styles are understood, respected, and embraced. By navigating the intricate landscape of gendered communication, we can forge connections that bridge the gaps created by societal norms and pave the way for more authentic and harmonious relationships.