Fate Vs Free Will in The Iliad

Categories: Iliad

"Considering the gods, fate, and free will is not an idea that is elite to Greek Literature; truth be told, the gods can be found putting their guiding hand into the activities of humans. For example, those that buy into a specific religion may ask themselves: if my gods have an arrangement for me, does all that I do fall in accordance with that arrangement? Are the decisions I settle on my own decisions, or are they steps that have been foreordained before my creation? But given the fairly far off nature of current gods, a supporter may discover it moderately simple to have faith in free will since there are frequently no solid indications of their gods' or fate’s direction.

Be that as it may, in the Homeric epic the Iliad, the gods’ contribution in mortal lives and the fate of the outcome is considerably more concrete, powerful, and clear since they are regularly directing the course of occasions on earth.

Get quality help now
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Fate

star star star star 4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

The characters of the Iliad do not have free will because every decision led to their destiny, the gods interfere with their lives, and everyone must have a reason to die. Fate is predetermined, cannot be changed and is the destiny of the mortals in the Iliad. Every character made conscious decisions that led to what was destined to happen. Each lie, action, battle and choice led to deaths and triumphs. The gods made decisions that helped their own outcomes, but fate always had the final say. They were not touched by it, but they still took away free will and were puppets to fate.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

Everyone is fated to fall at some point in their life but falling for something worthy was a necessity. It was something people looked up to and admired. There was nothing more important. These reasons are why free will does not exist in the Iliad.

In the Iliad, it seems as though everything that happened was already going to happen. The Trojan War was a story already told and would never change. The Iliad depicts destiny and predetermination as an incomparable and extreme power that is chosen by each man's activities and choices. A man's destiny lies in the outcomes of his activities and choices. A man in a roundabout way controls his predetermination by his activities and choices. One activity or choice has an outcome that prompts another activity or choice. A man is conceived with a web of many foreordained destinies and at least one fate. A man's choices control which course of destiny he takes so he, by implication, controls his destiny. The thing that you have finished with the destinies that you have managed, and where you have ended your life. In the end, a man's entire life might be followed to his first activity or choice. By expressing somebody's destiny as controlled by their activities or choices, destiny is unbreakable, what has been done will control the present, and at last what's to come. The present is controlled by the past with the goal that nobody may get away from their past choices or activities.

The hidden idea of destiny is that all men are not conceived rise to, with the goal that destiny is the impediments or capacities set upon him. Destiny is an idea that is astoundingly imperative to people, and it has gotten consideration from awesome personalities in each recorded period. Homer's polytheistic, complex thoughts of fate may at first appear to be over the top to the normal present-day researcher, yet his depiction of the horrifying vulnerability about who or what controls human results still connects with our endeavors to represent that scrutinizing and uncertainty. Inside the extent of The Iliad, people do not reliably feel that their destiny is unchangeable, however they regularly state that their fate is at last certain. Indeed, even the individuals who perceive that their guarded activities will not influence their definitive results endeavor to pick up respect for themselves and their dads and children. For example, the destiny of Achilles is guessed by prediction, in spite of the fact that the gods help convey it to pass. Thetis reveals to Achilles that he has the decision to either return home or bite the dust battling at Troy. Incomprehensibly, Achilles appears to have some decision in his destiny, and it is difficult to state whether Achilles' destiny is as of now decided, or whether he controls his destiny up until the point that he settles on his decision. Achilles chooses to battle, realizing that he is fixing his destiny when he comes back to fight.

Take a gander at the part of destiny, which is fated or anticipated occasions out of our individual control, and its part in the Iliad, which is not as direct as you may envision. Indeed, destiny is intense and hides behind everything, giving request and an ability to know east from west to the occasions of the Iliad. Be that as it may, an easily overlooked detail called free will, or the flexibility and capacity to settle on our own decisions, becomes possibly the most important factor and muddles the particulars of predetermined actions. The gods’ powerful influence was nothing short of choices acting as fate. The gods’ destiny is controlled much similarly as a mortal's, aside from one noteworthy contrast, the immortals could not have a fate, because they could not die. A god's life may not be judged in light of the fact that they have not and will not pass on. The divine beings can control mortal’s destiny yet not their own straightforwardly. A divine being may motivate a mortal to do or make something that may by implication influence the god's destiny.

This strengthens the idea that nobody may get away from his or her activities or choices. They made the mortals do as they pleased and blamed fate for it, because these people most likely would not have made those choices. For example, the almost murder of Agamemnon or the actions that took place in bed with Helen and Paris, sent by Aphrodite in Book 3 of the Iliad. Everyone in this story used destiny or fate in order to get out of their bad decisions. Hector even said “Fate? Nobody alive has ever gotten away it, neither overcome man nor weakling, I let you know— it is conceived with us the day that we are conceived.” In part of the story, Zeus literally helps the Trojans take the lead. While Thetis cried out about Achilles’ birth being of bitterness. She asked herself why she raised him because his life was going to be short anyway. She exclaimed that the fate of Achilles makes her wish that she had never raised him, then he even started to wish the very same thing. The presence and exercise of through and through freedom, notwithstanding, isn't constrained to mortals. Its work among the ethereal is best found in Book I, when Thetis requests that Zeus mediate in the war in the interest of Achilles, and in a trade amongst Zeus and Hera quickly after Thetis withdraws. Zeus discloses to Thetis he should consider her demand, offering her to ""trust me to put my psyche on this.” That he should think before settling on a choice obviously demonstrates he has a decision, and when he picks, he will practice his choice. Hera enters and requests that Zeus share what unfolded with Thetis. At the point when Zeus decays, and blames Hera for harrying him in a standout amongst the most engaging entries in the lyric, Hera answers that Zeus, the conveyor of through and through freedom, is ""very allowed to tell what you will”. At last, there is arrange in Homer's reality, kept up by the divine beings who decide the genuine degree of predetermination.

The gods in the Iliad are great and can make decisions in mortals' lives, impacting connections and achievement in fighting. Zeus, specifically, assumes a solid part in coordinating the mortals. He even has a strict scale, which he tips for the Trojans in Book 8. This quickly turns the tide in the war. There are additionally a few cases of divine beings interceding to offer boldness and quality on the mortals engaged with the war, as Poseidon does with the Aeantes siblings in Book 13. For all their capacity, in any case, the divine beings are as yet restricted by the limits of fate. While they impact everyday issues, the majority of the divine beings' interfering just winds up adding to the right destiny playing out. Zeus' works in the mortals includes tipping the war for the Trojans, yet this is simply transitory. Zeus' genuine explanation behind helping the Trojans is so the Greeks will be thumped, and Achilles will resemble a much more prominent saint when he comes back to the battling. The Greek side is destined to win the war, and regardless of what the divine beings do en route, this will happen. The divine beings comprehend that it can be hazardous to meddle with destiny and appear to regard its matchless quality. Here, the divine beings impact occasions keeping in mind the end goal to safeguard the manages of destiny. In like manner, Zeus and the gods periodically talk about destiny as something not even absolutely in their control. At last, the argument of fate vs. free will in the Iliad stays uncertain, but it does look like fate out scores free will.

In the Iliad, the idea that all mortals share a similar fate, that will be that everybody bites the dust, presents the estimations of respect and bravery, and different standards of what is correct and what isn't right. Mettle is exhibited unselfishness and the craving to make the wisest decision regardless of what the cost. Since all beyond words man who will forfeit himself for what he accepts is correct shows preeminent confidence and good character and additionally the outstanding characteristic of putting something unique over their own life. Fortitude or mettle isn't really forcefulness or wrath; for example, all of Achilles activities are alluded to first and foremost as ""the fierceness of Achilles"". Doing such things as trying a divine being may be overcome, yet something that is overcome isn't generally fair, while something that is good is constantly overcome. Respect is vital to the Greek character. Since legends are the quintessence of the general public from which they come, Greek saints experience their lives as per respect and transcendence, in the entirety of their shifted frames. Respect and radiance trigger an epic war that ends the lives of various men and shape its advancement at each stage. The fall of Troy is ""a thing… whose greatness will die never (Homer, Iliad)"".

The objective of the Greeks is the acclaim that reverberates even after death, and they don't let anything bar their direction. The respect of the individual, family, and network manage each activity and reaction. Respect and grandness characterize the legend, and in this manner are the establishments for everything that happens in Homer's Iliad. The ideas of respect and greatness are basic to understanding the inspiration of the saints in Homer's Iliad. Magnificence was picked up by incredible, gallant activities and deeds and was presented upon a person by other people who saw and acclaimed the superb activities. Real fights gave a chance to numerous to discover brilliance without a moment's delay. Respect was like magnificence, however while people in general needed to see activities and consider them great, every individual kept up their own particular feeling of individual respect which did not generally harmonize with respect as characterized or seen by the majority. Respect was increased through chivalry in fight, yet additionally through convincing speechmaking, dedication and other honorable characteristics that a man may illustrate. Having honor and wonder enabled a Greek to pick up impact in their general public; as Osborne expresses, ""People apply political impact as per their social standing, their explanatory capacities, and their own appeal, yet not as indicated by their holding the workplace of ruler"".

An illustration that exhibits this point happens in the Iliad in the midst of a contention over a conceivable withdraw. Odysseus, a regarded contender, makes the claim that it is ""despicable to hold up long and toward the end go home with nothing (Homer, Iliad)"". His message was generally welcomed. The Iliad recommend that the most daring deeds are the ones in which one danger their own particular life for what is correct and what they trust in. Two men battling on inverse sides may think of each as other good in light of the fact that both will forfeit for their causes. All men fear demise, so they intentionally choose to battle for what they put stock in, that which they think about preeminent most importantly, even their own life. The best men are judged by whether they have a reason that they consider preeminent over their own particular life and worth passing on for. On the off chance that one doesn't have a reason worth biting the dust for then one doesn't have a reason worth living for. At last, the argument of fate vs. free will in the Iliad stays uncertain, but it does look like fate out scores free will.

In conclusion, fate is predetermined, cannot be changed and is the destiny of the mortals in the Iliad. Freewill is the act of doing something constraint of fate. Choices and actions define our destiny and lead us to it. When gods are concerned, and they put forth their own powers in order to control the humans into the outcome they want, how do these mortals remotely see free will? When dying for something is so important, death does not seem that scary. By walking through the examples and diving into the story more, I think I have my answer."

Works cited

  1. Homer. (1990). The Iliad. Penguin Classics.
  2. Zafiropoulos, C. (2018). Fate, gods, and free will in Homer's Iliad: A literature review. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 36(2), 195-212.
  3. Sells, A. (2001). Fate and free will in Homer’s Iliad. College Literature, 28(1), 1-16.
  4. Griffin, J. (2016). Fate and free will in Homer. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics.
  5. Barker, E. T. E. (2006). Fate and free will in the Iliad. The Classical Quarterly, 56(1), 26-47.
  6. Woodard, R. D. (1982). Fate and free will in Greek thought. Studies in Language, Companion Series, 8, 313-324.
  7. Martin, R. P. (1989). Fate and free will in Virgil's Aeneid. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
  8. Raaflaub, K. A. (1994). Homeric warrior society and the concept of fate. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 35(1), 17-32.
  9. Carlisle, M. D. (2017). The role of the gods in Homer's Iliad. The Heroic Age: A Journal of Early Medieval Northwestern Europe, 19.
  10. Easterling, P. E. (2004). Homeric fate and the near-eastern kyklos. In R. Lämmle, P. Scholz, & M. Winkler (Eds.), Homer: Ein Symposion (pp. 1-18). Franz Steiner Verlag.
Updated: Feb 02, 2024
Cite this page

Fate Vs Free Will in The Iliad. (2024, Feb 06). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/fate-vs-free-will-in-the-iliad-essay

Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment