To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Our world is like a rich tapestry interwoven with a diverse array of cultures and societies, each carrying its own unique traits and customs. Cultural Relativism challenges the prevailing belief in the universality of moral truth, asserting that "different societies have different moral codes" (Rachels 618). In this exploration, we delve into examples, such as Eskimo customs, and societal conflicts on murder-related issues, advocating for Cultural Relativism's ability to foster understanding amid diverse cultural practices.
The subject of murder stands out as a common instance presumed to be an absolute wrong.
However, Eskimo customs shed light on the relativity of this moral judgment. In Eskimo society, practices like infanticide and killing elders exist, challenging our initial perception of these acts as morally inferior. For the Eskimos, these practices are not rooted in a lack of compassion or disrespect for life but are deemed necessary for the survival and balance of the group.
Within Eskimo groups, the males hold a higher status as hunters and providers of food, contributing to the group's sustenance.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Free Essays
4.9 (247)
“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”
The killing of female infants helps maintain a balanced gender ratio, crucial for the community's survival, considering the high mortality rate of males during hunting expeditions. While our society may recoil at these practices, understanding their necessity for survival is crucial to appreciating the Eskimos' perspective.
Furthermore, delving into the intricacies of Eskimo customs reveals a deeper layer of understanding. The males' elevated status is not arbitrary but stems from their role as hunters, a position vital for the community's sustenance.
The harsh Arctic conditions necessitate a strategic approach to resource allocation, and the Eskimo practices, including the killing of elders, are pragmatic measures for the group's overall well-being. This complexity challenges simplistic judgments and underscores the importance of context in assessing cultural practices.
Examining our own society, we encounter conflicting views on murder-related issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia. This internal dissension challenges the notion of Moral Absolutism, asserting that there is an exception to every moral absolute. The existence of conflicting moral perspectives within our society undermines the idea of a universal truth and paves the way for the acceptance of Cultural Relativism.
Moreover, the presence of moral conflicts within our society accentuates the need for a nuanced approach to ethics. Cultural Relativism proves beneficial in alerting us to the consequences of assuming our preferences are based on an objective standard. By acknowledging that our practices may seem strange to other societies, Cultural Relativism prompts self-reflection on the standards that inform our moral judgments.
Additionally, the recognition of conflicting views within our society challenges the notion of a singular moral truth. The debates surrounding abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia exemplify the diversity of perspectives even within a shared cultural framework. Cultural Relativism encourages individuals to appreciate the complexity of ethical considerations and refrain from imposing a singular moral standard on diverse situations.
Funerary practices serve as a poignant example of how Cultural Relativism challenges ethnocentrism. The Callatians, as documented by Herodotus, engage in the shocking practice of eating their dead fathers. While this may evoke immediate disgust in our society, Cultural Relativism prompts us to explore the reasoning behind such practices.
For the Callatians, consuming the remains of their deceased fathers is an act of respect, believing that their spirits will live on within them. Our society, accustomed to burying or cremating the dead, may find these practices repulsive. However, by delving into the cultural context and motivations, we can gain an understanding of the significance attributed to such actions within the Callatian society.
Moreover, scrutinizing funerary practices unveils the intricacies of cultural symbolism. The Callatians' unconventional approach challenges the conventional practices of burying or cremating the dead. Cultural Relativism prompts individuals to appreciate the diversity of perspectives on death and the afterlife, emphasizing that the symbolism attached to funerary practices varies across cultures.
The moral code of a society serves as the determinant of what is considered right within that society. Examining peculiar practices in various societies, such as the Eskimos' acceptance of killing the elderly and female infants for survival, challenges our preconceived notions of moral superiority.
Consider the example of differing beliefs regarding the shape of the Earth. Some societies may believe the Earth is flat, while others, like ours, believe it is round. Cultural Relativism suggests that the absence of a unanimous belief does not negate the existence of moral truth; instead, it highlights the diversity of moral perspectives.
Additionally, exploring the moral codes of diverse societies underscores the relativity of ethical standards. The Eskimos' pragmatic approach to survival, including practices that might seem morally objectionable in our society, exemplifies the contextual nature of morality. Cultural Relativism encourages individuals to recognize that moral codes are shaped by cultural contexts and may differ significantly without one being inherently superior to another.
Cultural Relativism introduces consequential shifts in our approach to diverse cultural practices. Firstly, it challenges us to abandon the tendency to label the customs of other societies as morally inferior. This shift is profound as it demands a conscious effort to respect and comprehend diverse practices, transcending ethnocentric judgments. The essence lies in recognizing that what may seem morally reprehensible from one cultural standpoint holds intrinsic value and validity within its own context. This relativistic view fosters a more inclusive and tolerant outlook, crucial for fostering global harmony amid cultural diversity.
Secondly, Cultural Relativism provides a practical and pragmatic approach to determining the morality of actions. By consulting the standards within our society, we establish a benchmark for moral acceptability. This approach negates the notion of a universal moral truth and emphasizes the importance of cultural context in evaluating the rightness or wrongness of an action. For instance, when contemplating policies like apartheid in South Africa, adherence to the society's moral code becomes the primary criterion for moral assessment, reflecting the essence of Cultural Relativism in ethical considerations.
The rejection of a universal truth catalyzed by Cultural Relativism paves the way for a profound shift in mindset — the embrace of open-mindedness. This transformative shift entails recognizing that our beliefs, often deeply ingrained by cultural upbringing, are not absolute truths but subjective interpretations. By understanding that cultural relativism allows for diverse moral codes, individuals are empowered to cultivate empathy and tolerance. This newfound open-mindedness enables a more nuanced exploration of cultural practices, fostering a spirit of curiosity rather than ethnocentric judgment.
When confronted with practices that initially trigger outrage or disgust, Cultural Relativism challenges individuals to transcend knee-jerk reactions. For instance, the Eskimos' practice of killing the elderly and female infants may evoke strong emotions, but a deeper exploration reveals the cultural necessity of these acts for the group's survival. The shift from immediate repulsion to understanding highlights the transformative power of Cultural Relativism in cultivating a more enlightened and compassionate worldview.
The fundamental premise of Cultural Relativism — the acknowledgment of subjective morality varying across cultures — plays a pivotal role in reshaping our approach to moral understanding. This recognition dismantles the illusion of a universal truth in ethics, prompting a paradigm shift. Through the lens of Cultural Relativism, we gain the capacity to appreciate the intricate tapestry of diverse human practices without imposing ethnocentric judgments. This lens acts as a bridge, facilitating cross-cultural comprehension and fostering an environment where diverse moral codes are seen as valid expressions of cultural identity rather than deviations from a presumed norm.
Consider the scenario where individuals from one culture initially express disgust at the Callatians' practice of eating their dead fathers. Through the lens of Cultural Relativism, these individuals can transcend their initial repulsion and comprehend that, within the Callatian cultural framework, this act is an expression of deep respect for the deceased. The expanded understanding gained through Cultural Relativism serves as a testament to its role in dismantling preconceived judgments and promoting a more nuanced, inclusive, and harmonious worldview.
In conclusion, Cultural Relativism emerges as a guiding principle that enables us to navigate the complexities of diverse moral codes. It not only challenges the notion of a universal truth in ethics but also encourages a more empathetic and open-minded approach to understanding cultural practices. As we grapple with the diverse tapestry of human societies, Cultural Relativism serves as a transformative force, fostering respect, understanding, and the dissolution of ethnocentric judgments. Embracing this perspective is essential for building bridges of comprehension in our globalized world, where cultural diversity is a defining feature of our shared humanity.
Diversity of Moral Codes: Embracing Varied Societal Perspectives. (2016, Jul 15). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/cultural-relativism-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
