To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In his article “Computer Wins On ‘Jeopardy!’: Trivial, It’s Not,” journalist John Markoff applauds the fairness of the supercomputer "Watson's" triumph over human champion Ken Jennings. However, this analysis seeks to challenge Markoff's perspective, asserting that the competition was far from fair due to the extraordinary capabilities of "Watson."
The core of the disagreement lies in Markoff's contention that the match was equitable. It is argued that the supercomputer's unparalleled speed and access to extensive information created an uneven playing field, rendering any claim of fairness questionable.
Markoff's own words highlight the incredible speed of "Watson," capable of responding in as little as 10 milliseconds.
This rapidity, beyond human capability, significantly diminishes the chances of competitors, exemplified by Ken Jennings, to respond effectively.
The assertion that "Watson" had the ability to access and answer an extensive array of questions further establishes the computer's dominance.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Artificial Intelligence
5 (234)
“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”
This advantage, absent in human competitors, amplifies the notion that the competition lacked fairness.
The claim that the battle was fair is contested, with emphasis placed on the inherent imbalance when pitting a computer with inhuman abilities against a human intellect. Ken Jennings, given these circumstances, had minimal chances of success.
Expanding on this, it's crucial to delve into the nature of human cognition. The human brain, while remarkable, operates within limitations of processing speed and access to information. In a game where rapid responses and vast knowledge are paramount, the disparity between the cognitive capacities of a computer and a human becomes glaringly evident.
Markoff's argument hinges on the definition of fairness.
While the rules of the game might have been consistent for both participants, the inherent advantages bestowed upon "Watson" create a substantial bias. Fairness, in essence, implies an equal and just competition. In this context, the competition was tilted in favor of the supercomputer, challenging the very essence of fairness.
While recognizing Markoff's clarity in presenting his arguments, the disagreement persists. Markoff's views are acknowledged, but the fundamental contention remains intact.
It's noteworthy to appreciate Markoff's articulation of his viewpoint. His arguments are logically structured, and he successfully conveys his belief in the fairness of the match. However, this acknowledgment doesn't sway the disagreement regarding the fairness of the competition. The clarity in presentation does not negate the fundamental disparities that undermine the notion of a level playing field.
One could argue that "Jeopardy!" is a game of strategy and adaptability, not merely speed and knowledge. While this is a valid point, it doesn't fully address the fundamental issue at hand—the overwhelming advantage in processing speed and access to information enjoyed by "Watson."
Reiterating the disagreement, it's essential to underscore that fairness in a competition implies equal opportunities for success. The intrinsic capabilities of "Watson" tipped the scales, creating an environment where a human competitor, regardless of strategic acumen, was fundamentally disadvantaged.
The disbelief in the fairness of the competition persists, leaving the reader astonished at the idea that such a match could be considered equitable. The inherent advantages of "Watson" make the claim of fairness dubious.
The strengths of Markoff's argument, including description and expression, are acknowledged. However, a potential weakness arises in comprehending how a computer can possess such unparalleled capabilities, a factor that may raise questions among readers.
It's imperative to recognize that while Markoff's argument is well-constructed, the disagreement stems from the broader perspective that considers the essence of fairness in a competition that inherently favors one side.
Unraveling the Notion of Fairness: Dissecting the 'Jeopardy!' Duel. (2016, May 16). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/critique-of-artificial-intelligence-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
