To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Trying to make sense of why people engage in criminal behavior has led psychologists down diverse paths, each marked by its own theories. In this exploration, we embark on a journey through three key perspectives—biological, psychological, and social theories of crime—while grappling with the fundamental question: Are criminals born or made? Let's dive into the nuances of genetic influences, psychological expectations, and social learning, aiming to uncover a more holistic understanding.
The biological theory proposes a strong genetic undercurrent in criminal behavior, suggesting that the roots of criminal tendencies often lie within families.
Adoption studies become our window into deciphering whether it's the genes or the environment shaping criminal behavior. In a noteworthy study, Mednick et al. (1987) scrutinized over 14,000 adopted individuals, painting a compelling picture that genetics might wield more influence than environmental factors in steering criminal paths.
Expanding on Mednick et al.'s groundwork, Bohman (1996) took up the baton, replicating the study and comparing sons with biological criminal parents to those with adoptive criminal parents.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Theory
5 (234)
“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”
The echoes of their findings resound, reinforcing the idea that genetics plays a pivotal role in setting the stage for criminal predisposition. The intricate dance between nature and nurture exposes the complex interplay that shapes criminal behavior.
Shifting gears to the psychological theory, it unfurls the notion that negative expectations can act as a catalyst for criminal behavior. Enter the self-fulfilling prophecy, where stereotypes mold social interactions, potentially steering individuals towards criminal acts.
Jahoda's (1954) examination of names within the Ashanti community adds a fascinating layer. The study uncovers a correlation between boys with specific 'soul names' and their involvement in violent crime, underscoring how societal expectations and stereotypes can mold behaviors.
The social theory introduces the idea that learning isn't just about books but occurs through observation and imitation. Whether motivated internally or externally, children, especially those with criminal parents or influential role models, are likely to internalize criminal behaviors. Eron et al.'s (1972) exploration into the link between exposure to violent media models and children's aggression lends credence to the idea that external stimuli, such as media, can play a role in shaping criminal predispositions.
Weighing these theories, it becomes clear that each brings something valuable to the table, backed by tangible evidence. Biological theory roots criminal behavior in genetic predispositions, psychological theory highlights the impact of stereotypes, and social theory emphasizes the role of observational learning. Instead of pitting one theory against the others, it seems that a nuanced understanding of criminal behavior beckons us to weave these perspectives together.
As we wrap up this exploration, the complexity of understanding criminal behavior becomes apparent. Biological, psychological, and social theories offer unique insights, each contributing to our comprehension of this intricate phenomenon. While the age-old debate of whether criminals are born or made persists, a synthesis of these theories emerges as a plausible path forward. By embracing the rich tapestry woven by each perspective, we inch closer to a more holistic understanding of why individuals find themselves entangled in criminal behavior.
Exploring Criminal Behavior: Biology, Psychology, and Society. (2018, Oct 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/criminals-are-made-or-born-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
