To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The objective of this essay is to conduct a comparative analysis of post-colonialism and post-structuralism as theories within the field of international politics. This examination will involve elucidating the fundamental principles of each theory and subsequently exploring the points of convergence and divergence between these two approaches. To facilitate a comprehensive evaluation, this essay will be structured as follows: firstly, it will delineate the foundational tenets of post-colonialism and post-structuralism as theories of international politics; secondly, it will illuminate the similarities and disparities between these paradigms; and finally, it will provide a succinct summary of the key distinctions and commonalities characterizing post-colonialism and post-structuralism.
Post-colonialism emerged as a notable perspective in international relations during the 1990s, rendering it a relatively recent entrant into the academic discourse.
Although it did not initially originate as a distinct subfield within international relations, post-colonialism challenges the foundations of traditional IR theories, particularly critiquing the Eurocentrism inherent in these paradigms.
At its core, post-colonialism rejects the notion that nation-states invariably constitute the primary actors in international relations.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Comparison
4.7 (657)
“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”
Instead, it shifts the focus towards understanding global events from the vantage point of the colonized regions, effectively redirecting the analytical lens away from the colonizing Western world. The central objective of post-colonialism is to amplify the voices of the subaltern, enabling their perspectives to be heard and acknowledged. Post-colonialists contend that the enduring repercussions of colonialism and imperialism persistently reverberate throughout the formerly colonized nations (Baylis, 2011, p. 190).
What sets post-colonialism apart is its willingness to incorporate a diverse array of sources, including fiction, poetry, diaries, and testimonials, into its analytical toolkit.
These sources offer valuable insights and viewpoints that enrich the understanding of international politics from non-Western perspectives. Post-colonialism's inclusive approach seeks to deconstruct the prevailing narratives that have historically dominated the discourse on global affairs.
Post-structuralism, like post-colonialism, introduces a critical dimension to the study of international relations. It casts a critical eye on the conventional practices of states in conducting their foreign policies and questions the methodological approaches advocated by traditional IR theories. However, post-structuralism goes further by incorporating philosophical concepts and ideas into the realm of international relations (Baylis, 2011, p. 69).
Central to post-structuralism are various philosophical concepts, including discourse, deconstruction, genealogy, and intertextuality. These concepts serve as analytical tools that facilitate a deeper examination of the construction of knowledge and the shaping of the international political landscape.
Discourse, as defined by the French philosopher Michel Foucault, refers to a linguistic system that organizes statements and concepts (Baylis, 2011, p. 170). In essence, it underscores the idea that language is not merely a tool of communication but also an integral component in the construction of our understanding of the world.
Genealogy, another concept introduced by Foucault, is characterized as a 'history of the present' (Baylis, 2011, p. 171). It involves an analysis of discursive practices in terms of their historical origins, with the aim of revealing the historical evolution of truth claims. Through genealogy, post-structuralism seeks to unveil the historical underpinnings of prevailing narratives and ideologies.
Deconstruction, a theory advanced by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida, delves into the dichotomies inherent in language. Derrida argues that language is replete with dichotomies, and these dichotomies are imbued with power dynamics, where one term is often positioned as superior to the other. For instance, in the context of international relations, the dichotomy between the developed and the underdeveloped nations illustrates this power dynamic (Baylis, 2011, p. 171). Derrida's deconstruction theory endeavors to dismantle these dichotomies and reveal the underlying power structures.
Intertextuality, a concept developed by semiotic theorist Julia Kristeva, posits that all texts are intertextual in nature. This implies that every text is composed of a mosaic of preexisting texts, and they are interconnected with texts that precede them. Intertextuality underscores the idea that texts are not isolated entities but are embedded within a web of interconnected narratives and discourses.
Despite their distinct origins and emphases, post-colonialism and post-structuralism share several commonalities that underpin their status as post-positivist theories within international relations. Both paradigms reject the positivist premise that either realism or liberalism provides a comprehensive and universally applicable framework for understanding international politics. Instead, they prioritize critical inquiry and open-ended questioning over the assertion of definitive answers (Baylis, 2011, p. 93).
Moreover, both post-colonialism and post-structuralism have played instrumental roles in expanding the horizons of international relations scholarship. They have successfully challenged the primacy of the nation-state as the exclusive locus of political agency and have emphasized the importance of alternative perspectives and voices in shaping the discourse of international politics.
While post-colonialism and post-structuralism share certain affinities, they also exhibit key differences that demarcate their respective scopes and emphases. One significant disparity lies in their areas of focus. Post-structuralism places a predominant emphasis on the role of language in shaping our comprehension of the world (Baylis, 2011, p. 170). It scrutinizes language as a fundamental component of our sense-making process.
Conversely, post-colonialism directs its attention toward amplifying the viewpoints and theories of the colonized peoples, shifting the spotlight away from the perspective of the colonizing "Western world" (Baylis, 2011, p. 193). It delves into the international relations of colonial actions in the Third World and underscores the enduring legacies of colonialism in contemporary global affairs.
Another notable distinction is the realm of focus within international politics. Post-structuralism primarily concerns itself with high politics, emphasizing states' constructions of threats and enemies. In contrast, post-colonialism gravitates towards low politics, culture, and the experiences of ordinary individuals, rather than the state-centric narratives prevalent in traditional international relations theories.
To summarize, post-colonialism and post-structuralism are both post-positivist theories that have made significant contributions to the field of international relations. They share commonalities in their rejection of positivist approaches, their expansion of the discipline's boundaries, and their critical perspectives on prevailing global narratives. However, they diverge in terms of their areas of focus, with post-structuralism prioritizing language and discourse analysis, while post-colonialism centers on amplifying the voices and experiences of colonized peoples and low politics.
In conclusion, these two theories enrich our understanding of international politics by challenging established norms and offering alternative frameworks for analysis. They remind us that the world of international relations is multifaceted and complex, and that different perspectives and voices deserve recognition in shaping our comprehension of global affairs. As the field of international relations continues to evolve, post-colonialism and post-structuralism stand as important pillars in broadening our horizons and fostering critical engagement with the complexities of the global stage.
Comparison of Post-Colonialism and Post-Structuralism in International Politics. (2016, Sep 26). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/comparison-post-colonialism-and-post-structuralism-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
