Differences Between "Flowers for Algernon" Short Story and Movie

The adaptation of literary works into film often involves significant alterations, and "Flowers for Algernon" is no exception. In this essay, I will delve into the distinctions between the short story and the movie, highlighting the impact of these differences and ultimately arguing that the short story is the superior medium for conveying this narrative.

Character Development: A Deeper Dive in the Movie

One of the most prominent disparities between the short story and the movie lies in the portrayal of Charlie's character.

The short story provides minimal information about his family, leaving readers to construct their understanding of his background. In contrast, the movie delves extensively into Charlie's childhood, offering insights that are absent in the short story. The visual medium of film allows for a more detailed depiction of Charlie's loneliness, transforming him into a more fully fleshed-out character.

Charlie's self-identification as lonely in the movie adds layers to his character that are absent in the short story. In a short story, readers must actively engage in character development, piecing together fragments of information.

Get quality help now

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

Proficient in: Free Essays

4.7 (235)

“ Amazing writer! I am really satisfied with her work. An excellent price as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

However, a movie, through visuals and storytelling techniques, can swiftly convey a comprehensive image of a character. The movie supplements Charlie's loneliness with information about his family, providing a more rounded understanding of his emotional state.

Varied Pathos: Emotional Depth in Short Story and Movie

Another notable difference lies in the emotional depth, or pathos, conveyed in the short story and the movie. The movie introduces pathos through the identification of Charlie, Ms. Kinnian, and indirectly Algernon with loneliness.

This heightened emotional portrayal contributes to the overall pathos of the film, eliciting a stronger emotional response from the audience. The emotional nuances around the relationship between Charlie and Ms. Kinnian add layers of sentimentality absent in the short story.

The movie's emphasis on emotion may stem from the medium's inherent demand for heightened sentiment to engage the audience. Unlike a short story, which can maintain a more restrained emotional tone, a movie often relies on intense emotional connections to captivate viewers. The omniscient perspective of film, unable to replicate the diary form of a short story, necessitates the infusion of heightened pathos to establish a profound connection between the characters and the audience.

Evolution of Doctor Characters: Dr. Nemur's Absence

A significant alteration involves the portrayal of the doctors conducting the operation. In the short story, Dr. Nemur represents the scientific world, lacking in humanity at times. Dr. Strauss, on the other hand, embodies the compassionate and humane side of the medical profession, showing concern for Charlie's feelings and psychology. However, in the movie, Dr. Nemur is notably absent, and Dr. Strauss takes on the combined role of representing both the scientific and compassionate aspects.

The merging of Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss into a single character for the movie results in Dr. Strauss taking on a somewhat grotesque persona. This amalgamation forces the character to embody the conflicting values of the scientific community and the world of humanity and ethics. The nuanced dynamics between the two doctors in the short story are sacrificed, leading to a simplified, and perhaps, less nuanced representation in the film.

Conclusion: The Short Story as the Superior Medium

In conclusion, the differences between the "Flowers for Algernon" short story and the movie are substantial and impact the overall storytelling experience. While the movie intensifies emotional engagement and streamlines certain narrative elements, it sacrifices the nuanced character development and ethical complexities present in the short story. The short story, with its capacity for reader interpretation and depth of character exploration, emerges as the more successful medium for conveying the essence of Charlie's transformation. It allows readers the autonomy to form their interpretations, a crucial aspect of both storytelling and life.