To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The marriage of Italy and the unification Germany took place about the same time. Italy was made up of little city-states and Germany was divided also. The emerging leader in Italy who promoted marriage was a gentleman called Count Camillo Benso de Cavour. In Germany it was a gentleman called Otto Von Bismarck. Cavour and Bismarck had some similar and various techniques for marriage. Eventually, Cavour and Bismarck succeeded in unifying their own areas. Count Camillo Benso de Cavour is an extremely important person in the history of Italy.
He was among the first individuals to do something about unification. He wasn't the only one though. Giuseppe Mazzini and Giuseppe Garibaldi had a considerable role in the marriage of Italy too.
Cavour was the most intriguing of the 3. Cavour was the primary minister of a little city-state in Italy called Piedmont Sardinia. Unlike Mazzini, he was an advocate of real politik (what can we get done here? Truth of things). The intriguing feature of Cavour is he looked for to expand the impact of Piedmont Sardinia in Italy; he didn't necessarily wish to merge Italy.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Army
4.9 (247)
“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”
As Cavour is expanding Piedmont Sardinia power through Italy, he got help from Napoleon III and got areas like Lombardi and Milan. He continued to move south through Italy because he feared Garibaldi's success would compromise the power of Piedmont Sardinia. Garibaldi was a true hero in Italy since he desired unification. Italian unification is exactly what Garibaldi achieved. Cavour and Piedmont Sardinia got into the Papal States.
They wished to slow down Garibaldi's success. Instead of combating back, Garibaldi just stepped down. The reason for this was because Garibaldi cared more about Italy being merged than himself being ruler of a combined Italy. Therefore, Italy was in complete control of the king, Victor Emmanuel, of Piedmont Sardinia.
Cavour led Piedmont Sardinia throughout Italy and ultimately unified Italy. Complete unification was in 1870 when the French left Rome during the Franco-Prussian war. Cavour and the Piedmonts led a constitutional monarchy in Italy after unification. Otto Von Bismarck was the leading force in German unification. He was a conservative who was appointed prime minister by William I in 1862. What he really wanted was to become more powerful and create a larger Germany. He wanted a strong monarchy, army and industrial base. He also wanted to diminish liberalism. The establishment of the Zollverein was verysignificant to his success. It was a group of German states that managed customs and economic policies within their territories. He participated in a series of wars to try and expand his power but also to try and gain allies. In 1867, Bismarck annexed several German states to create the North German Confederation (a form of a new government).
This played a big role during the most significant war, the Franco-Prussian war. A dynastic dispute over Spain brought tensions between France and Prussia to a head. Prussia and France started having intense negotiations over the future of Spain. Secretly, Bismarck didn’t want to deal with France, he wanted war. Through propaganda, Bismarck was able to make France declare war on Prussia. The Germans and the Northern German confederation defeated the French at the battle of Sedans. At the Hall of mirrors at Versailles, the new German Empire had been proclaimed in 1871. Bismarck wanted war because he was confident he would be victorious. He knew he would get more territory.
Germany got Alsace and Lorraine after they defeated the French. Because the Prussian army was the main military force, they became the German army. Prussia morphed into Germany after unification, but continued to rule the nation. There are a lot of similarities, and a lot of differences relating to the methods that Cavour and Bismarck used. Both Cavour and Bismarck led a movement towards unification. Both people didn’t set up big nationalistic movements to do so, it just sort of happened. Cavour and Bismarck both started their own movements towards unification after they were appointed high positions for their governments. Other than that, they didn’t have many similarities.
Cavour was the type of person who relied on diplomacy. Cavour discussed and planned how to do things, yet never really participated. Bismarck was the complete opposite. Bismarck was the man of the extremely powerful Prussian army. Cavour’s main opponents were the people and Garibaldi. Very few people actually supported Cavour. Cavour also had the Austrians as opponents. Bismarck’s opponents were countries like Austria and France. Cavour had a better location, yet not a ton of power because when Italy was unified, Victor Emmanuel took over. Bismarck had a ton of power but an awful location. The independent states, which are eventually Germany, were located in the middle of super powers of the world and Bismarck had the tough task of unifying all of them. Cavour and Bismarck were successful in unifying their own areas. Ultimately, Cavour was an opportunist who achievedunification through diplomacy. Bismarck was a very powerful man who played multiple sides throughout the unification of Germany, yet was able to unify it due to the ridiculously powerful Prussian army and the Zollverein. Cavour and Bismarck were great leaders, and they each accomplished something amazing.
Cavour's Diplomacy and Bismarck's Army in History. (2016, Apr 12). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/cavours-diplomacy-and-bismarcks-army-in-history-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
