Case Study – Profitel Inc

Decision maker: Lars Peeters, together with his group of executives

Question 1: Which point of view of leadership finest explains the issues experienced in this case? Evaluate the case utilizing principles talked about because management viewpoint. Leadership is specified as the collective efficiency and successes of companies members by influencing, inspiring, and enabling others to contribute. In this case Lars Peeters, recently selected CEO of Profitel, stops working to preserve his function by doing not have essential components main for efficient management.

Together with his executive group he hired from his previous employment, compromise Profitel's image and success with consumers, federal government leaders and even workers.

Noted below are perspectives of leadership I have actually identified in this case that best describe the problems at hand: Contingency Perspective-- Lars had actually not identified Profitels's circumstance completely and adapted their style and goals to fit that scenario. Instead of using the employee's ideas and insights as a powerful options, Lars went ahead with his team of executives and implemented his methods overlooking any feedback.

Get quality help now

Writer Lyla

Verified writer

Proficient in: Case Study

5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Behavioral Perspective-- Although Lars displays task-oriented behavior by pushing company to reach a certain goal, he lacks in people-oriented behavioral skills. This could explain for his disregard to his subordinates trust and lack of employee morale. Transformational Perspective-- Lars failed to create a strategic vision for Profitel. By using one he could have build employee morale by increasing commitment and rewarding based on performances.

Questions 2: What can organizations do to minimize the leadership problems discussed above? In this case Profitel’s broad based there to hire Lars as CEO based on reputation rather than focusing on how his expertise could benefit their company.

Lars took incentive in implementing all major decisions without others input or involvement. The board of directors seemed to have minimal role in the company’s development and should have taken more precautions like overseeing major decisions. Also they should have evaluated his internal performance through feedback from employees and external performance through customers.