Business Gone Green Ethical Reasoning Assignment

1. Define the ethical concern determined

  • Edited ladies from their Saudi Arabia’s catalogue
  • Breaks Ikea Group and Sweden’s worths
  • Shows the prevalent ethical company difficulty faced
  • Further ethical implications such as cultural imperialism

2. Problem building: Theoretical point of views used to elaborate on the problem

  • Consequentialism – Ethical Egoism: Self interest to gather organisation assistance warranted
  • Consequentialism– Utilitarianism: Broke view of bulk; unjustified
  • Deontology– Kantianism: In accordance to moral rules of Saudi Arabia, versus concept moral of rights
  • The Traditional Approach: Follows traditional Saudi Arabia’s advertising; warranted

3. Issue building and construction: Uncertainties fundamental in the concern

Business principles and business social obligation- search for universal worths for global commercial behaviour

Cultural Imperialism – Violation of Islam values- Westerners criticize what they do not comprehend, it may not be right to slam Ikea’s behaviour

Intent of modifying Saudi’s Brochure– intent stays unidentified

4. Explanation & & validation: Effects on key stakeholders

  • Ikea as a corporation & & its employees – unfavorable effects on its track record and reliability hence necessary for the business to embrace a worldwide guideline
  • Ikea’s local and international consumers – numerous Swedes were angered by Ikea’s decision
  • Swedish government – have actually represented Sweden as being gender unequal

5. Conclusion: Values, synthesis, and trade offs

  • Important that Ikea waits its worths in all situations
  • In order to send out the appropriate message to its consumers target
  • Business red light to Ikea to take cultural marketing issues more seriously
  • Act in the interest of its stakeholders as it serves an indirect representation.

    Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
    Number of pages
    Email Invalid email

    By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

    "You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
    Check writers' offers

    You won’t be charged yet!

  • How to reconcile localization with a universal ethics code, however, will remain a challenge for Ikea as well as other corporations.


Definition of the Ethical issue

Ikea, the international furniture company, edited women from their Saudi Arabia’s catalogue. This action is deemed ethically inappropriate, as it seems to support gender inequality, which goes against Ikea Group and Sweden’s values. (Quinn, 2012) Some may argue that Ikea was submitting to pressure from the conservative Islamic state while others say that Ikea was just respecting and being understanding towards Saudi Arabia’s cultural standards. This media coverage aptly reflects the pervasive ethical business challenge faced by globalized companies, where it is difficult to find a balance between international commercial behaviour and localization of marketing communications. Moreover, this issue could lead to further ethical implications such as cultural imperialism, which will be discussed further.

Theoretical Perspectives to Elaborate on the Issue

1) Principles approach

(a) Consequentialism – Ethical Egoism

Under the egoism approach, Ikea’s decision is justifiable as the move to satisfy Saudi monarchy’s gender segregation rules (Kayyem, 2012) could be seen as an act of self-interest to garner business support in a male-dominated society. On the other hand, Ikea may have also thought that it is an ethical action to be sensitive to women’s rights in Saudi Arabia and conform to them.

(b) Consequentialism – Utilitarianism

On the basis that following the view of the majority will produce the best consequence, Ikea’s action is unjustifiable as its action is against the values of Ikea, Sweden and even United Nations (United Nations Millennium Goals). Ikea’s act has thus garnered many bad press and negative reaction from the general public. It has also worsened its own brand image and reputation in the globalized economy.

(c) Deontology – Kantianism

Ikea’s actions are in accordance to moral rules dictated by the Sharia council as women’s rights in Saudi Arabia is largely influenced and defined by Islam and tribal customs. However, this conflicts with the moral principle of rights stating that, “ All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” (Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

2) The Conventional Approach

In this final approach, the justification of an act depends on the prevailing norms of the society. In Saudi’s advertisements, women only appear infrequently. (Quinn, 2012) It is not unusual to see censors blacking out many parts of a women’s body in imported magazines. Thus Ikea’s actions will be deemed acceptable to the conventional approach of advertisements in Saudi Arabia.

From the different theoretical perspectives above, it clear that the moral rules and principles that Saudi Arabia follows is different from the rest of the world. Thus it really boils down to which values do Ikea chooses to uphold.

Uncertainties Inherent in the Issue

(a) Business ethics and corporate social responsibility Being a globalized business, Ikea will be constantly dealing with business ethics issue such as the search for universal values for international commercial behaviour. For example, when you adapt your business practices to the country’s customs, cultural values and legal requirements, it might be seen as unacceptable in your home markets. (Baker, 2012) Vice versa, if Ikea were to release an unaltered version of the catalogues in Saudi Arabia, would there be a backlash in the Muslim community? This business uncertainty remains a challenge to international companies.

(b) Cultural Imperialism – Infringement of Islam values

Furthermore, there are many misconceptions in the West about women’s life in Saudi Arabia (NAFJAN, 2012). Western critics towards women rights in Saudi has “failed to understand the uniqueness of Saudi Society”(Zoepf, 2010) and thus should not inflict western values or lifestyles on the Saudi Arabians said journalist Maha Akeei, a frequent critic of Saudi’s patriarchal customs. (Hiel, 2007) Since Westerners criticize what they do not understand, it might not be right to criticize Ikea’s behaviour when Ikea is being sensitive to their culture.

(c) Intent of altering Saudi’s Catalogue

While the reason why Ikea decided to steer away from their progressive Swedish values at home is unclear, it is difficult to ascertain whether the issue was ethical as mentioned earlier.

Effects on key stakeholders

(a) Ikea as a corporation & its employees

Ikea has always been a brand conscious company who has an image that cares about sustainability and its moral values. The company is named one of the ‘World’s Most Ethical Companies’ for the fourth consecutive year in 2010. (PRNewswire, 2010) However, the fact that the company could betray the company’s values at the drop of a hat, have disappointed many of its customers. Even though Ikea was quick to apologise, its actions already has negative repercussions on its reputation and credibility. (Knowledge@Wharton, 2012) Therefore, it is imperative for the company to adopt an international guideline for its employees to follow to better deal with such dilemmas in the future. The company continued: “We are now reviewing our routines to safeguard a correct content presentation from a values point of view in the different versions of the IKEA Catalogue worldwide.” (Quinn, 2012)

(b) Ikea’s local and global customers

Moreover, many Swedes were offended by Ikea’s decision, believing that the deletion of women from the Saudi catalogue portrayed their country as being “gender unequal.”(Vasic, 2012) Global customers who are supporters of women’s rights will also think less of Ikea and be less loyal towards Ikea.

(c) Swedish government

Even though Ikea is a private company, it inevitably projects an image of Sweden around the world. (Swedish equality minister Nyamko Sabuni, CBC News, 2012) An article of the Swedish Institute also further substantiates that “Ikea is doing more for the image of Sweden than all governmental efforts” (Wästberg, O., 2009). As mentioned, Ikea’s decision might have portrayed Sweden as being gender unequal, thus it is important for Ikea to uphold Sweden’s image, as it is a corporate representation of the country.

In all, Ikea’s reputation has taken a toll and should operate with the right values expected from its customers.


Based on the ethical theories of egoism, conventional approach and moral rules in Saudi Arabia, Ikea’s actions are deemed ethical while based on utilitarianism and principles of rights, their actions are deemed unethical. While one can never satisfy everyone, it is important that Ikea stands by its values in all circumstances, (i.e. sent the original Swedish version of the catalogue to Saudi Arabia) especially when it involves a violation of human rights, (Knowledge@Wharton, 2012) to send the correct message to its consumers target. While there might be nuances of cultural imperialism when different stakeholders criticize Ikea’s actions, it once again boils down to understanding both cultures fully before making a stand.

To recapitulate, through globalization and communications revolution, it is inevitable for companies to face ethical and cultural conflicts. Ikea reflects the realistic marketing choices confronting many globalized companies around the world, with the companies not hesitating to localize their marketing communications though it is against the company’s code of conduct. While Ikea’s motive remains unknown, it has apologised nonetheless. This lesson learnt serves as a corporate red light to Ikea to take cultural marketing issues more seriously and to act in the interest of its stakeholders as it serves an indirect representation. Also, exactly how to reconcile localization with a universal ethics code, however, will remain a challenge for Ikea as well as other corporations.


  • Quinn, B. (2012). Ikea apologises over removal of women from Saudi Arabia catalogue. The Guardian:
  • United Nation. (2010) United Nations Millennium Goals
  • United Nations (2010) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 1
  • Baker (2012) IKEA’s Saudi catalogue apology – right and wrong
  • Zoepf, Katherine (2010). “Talk of Women’s Rights Divides Saudi Arabia”. The New York Times.
  • Hiel, Betsy (2007). “Dhahran women push the veil aside”. Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Retrieved 19 September 2010.
  • PRNewswire ( 2010) IKEA Named as One of the ‘World’s Most Ethical Companies’ for Fourth Consecutive Year in 2010
  • Arabic Knowledge@Wharton. (2012, October 16). Missing the Picture: IKEA’s Women-free Catalogue in Saudi Arabia Fails to Protect Company Values and Reputation. Retrieved from Arabic Knowledge@Wharton:
  • Vasic 2012 Ikea Erases Women From Saudi Arabian Catalogue
  • Swedish equality minister Nyamko Sabuni, CBC News, 2012 Ikea regrets editing women out of Saudi catalogue
  • Wästberg, O.(2009) Branding Sweden & Ikea

Cite this page

Business Gone Green Ethical Reasoning Assignment. (2016, Mar 23). Retrieved from

Business Gone Green Ethical Reasoning Assignment

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment