We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

Analysis of Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare

Paper type: Analysis
Pages: 6 (1337 words)
Categories: Shakespeare
Downloads: 17
Views: 443

Much Ado About Nothing is a play set in c1598 in England. The author of this play, William Shakespeare has actually used various literary methods to construct and establish its characters. This essay will analyse some of the strategies consisting of tone, character-specific dialogue, dramatic paradox, soliloquy, and significance that has been utilized by the author to construct the characters of the play consisting of Benedick, Beatrice, and Don John. Tone is one of the significant strategies used by Shakespeare in this play, to reveal audience the type and behaviour of characters.

In the introduction of the play, Beatrice asks the messenger who had concerned deliver a message that specified that prince Pedro is pertaining to Messina, if “Signior Montanto” (1. 1. 25) (mocking “Signior Benedick”) had returned from the fight. The tone of Beatrice utilized in this introductory scene, offers audience an idea that she may be a witty character. Beatrice, like in this scene, has an amusing mindset in the majority of the scenes.

An example of this is where Leonato is talking to Beatrice about her future husband, where she mentions that a one who has a beard is “more than a youth” (2.1. 27) and he is not for her, whereas one who has none is “less than a guy” (2. 1. 38) and she is not for him, concluding that there is no man that has the ability to become her partner. This shows that Beatrice is an extremely hard-hearted character and can not be changed or pleased so quickly. The tone of Beatrice is normally specific in many of the parts of the play. Nevertheless, this is likewise true for the other characters in the play. This demonstrates how tone can be utilized to specifically recognise a character.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the author has actually used Tone as one of the early methods in building and developing the characters, to let the audience learn about the characters’ character and behaviour. A method that is utilized for the majority of the characters of the play is character-specific discussion. Character-specific discussion connects to tone; it makes audience knowledgeable about the way a specific character speaks and reveals his thoughts.

Don John is the character in the play that never changes his way of speech. In the scene where Don John speaks for the first time, he has a very villainy dialogue where he states how “That young start-up” (Don Pedro) “hath all the glory” of Don John’s “overthrow”, and if Don John can “cross him anyway”, he blesses himself “every way” (1. 3. 48).

This way of speech stays the same at all the parts of the play; “I am sick in displeasure to him, and whatsoever comes athwart his affection ranges evenly with mine” (2. 2. 5). This technique similar to tone, contrasts the dialogue of characters to differentiate between the ways different characters think and behave. It is used to make characters seem different or similar to other characters; otherwise known as stereotyping.

Thus, character specific dialogue makes audience familiar to the behaviour and thoughts of a character, and is therefore used for constructing characters. Dramatic irony is another technique used in this play that gives audience an overview of the way characters think in certain situations. Dramatic irony, is a technique that aids in developing characters mostly by showing the characters’ feelings (that are not usually visible) towards something that they think is real, but only the audience know if it is true (i. e. where at least one character doesn’t know what the audience know).

An example of this is in a scene where Don Pedro, Leonato and the other men were discussing how Lady Beatrice “was in love with Signior Benedick” (2. 3. 82). The dramatic irony here is that Signior Benedick in this scene was hiding and overhearing the conversation, but doesn’t know that he was being deceived into believing that Lady Beatrice is madly in love with him. Since benedick gets deceived into believing that Beatrice really loves him, he then expresses his deeper feelings much more to the audience as he says to himself that if Beatrice does love him, “it must be requited” (2.3. 183) and otherwise he will not be.

This shows that dramatic irony leads into constructing and developing characters, as dramatic irony in a way allows audience to overview and understand a character’s deeper thoughts/feelings. Soliloquy is also a technique that has been used similar to dramatic irony by putting forward the emotions of a character and having an overview of his/her personality/thoughts to aid in building the character.

Dramatic irony is where ‘there is something that a character doesn’t know, but the audience are aware of it’, whereas a soliloquy is where ‘the audience know what a character is feeling but other characters are not addressed’. A good example of a soliloquy is in the scene where benedick is speaking to himself about how a man changes himself after falling in love. In the scene, benedick says how “One woman is fair, yet I am well; another is wise, yet I am well; another virtuous, yet I am well” (2. 3. 21) but unless there is a woman who has all three qualities, he shall not fall in love with any woman.

From this scene, it is observed that benedick has certain values that a woman should have, and that she is the woman he will fall in love with. As seen, soliloquy opens the door to a character’s deeper feelings. These are feelings that a character is not likely to state when other characters are present and addressed. This shows how soliloquy, similar to dramatic irony, lets the audience know about a character’s deep thoughts/emotions. Another technique that had been used was Symbolism. This technique is present in many scenes throughout the play.

It has been used to make the audience visualise and understand certain aspects of the play. An example of this is in the scene where Beatrice gets deceived by her cousin into believing that “Benedick loves Beatrice so entirely” (3. 1. 37). In the scene Hero tells Margaret how it is good for Benedick to forget Beatrice as “Disdain and scorn ride sparkling” (3. 1. 51) in Beatrice’s eyes and “Mispricing” (3. 1. 52) everything they see. This was being said so to make Beatrice realise that her behaviour was full of scorn and pride.

At this time when the play was written, women generally had to be polite when men are around. However, it is seen that Beatrice’s character does not obey this rule, and her behaviour is contrasted with other women. In the introduction of the play, as seen in the paragraph that analysed “tone” as a technique, Beatrice was a witty character. Though at the introduction tone was used to develop the character of Beatrice to be witty, it has also been repeated throughout the play. The repetition of this fact has led to symbolise Beatrice with the character of wit and wit itself.

This shows how symbolism has been used along with tone and repetition to construct characters of the play. The literary techniques analysed above show how they were used to construct characters and position audience to let the characters be constructed within their thoughts. Shakespeare has used various literary techniques including tone, character-specific dialogue, dramatic irony, soliloquy, and symbolism to directly and indirectly construct and develop the characters of the play Much Ado about Nothing.

All of these techniques relate to each other within the context of constructing characters by various means like giving characters an insight of character’s thoughts, letting audience know more about the personality of characters etc. Thus these techniques have been used in the play to create and develop the characters of the play. Bibliography * Shakespeare, William. Mares, F. H. ed. The New Cambridge Shakespeare – Much Ado About Nothing. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print * n. p. “Glossary of Literary Terms” uncp. com. UNCP, n. d. Web. 22 Aug, 2010.

Cite this essay

Analysis of Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare. (2016, Sep 20). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/analysis-of-much-ado-about-nothing-by-william-shakespeare-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!