Why Criminals Deserved Punishment Essay
Why Criminals Deserved Punishment
Arguments in favour of the motion:
a) Criminals deserve punishment as they are wicked. If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilise the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime. b) If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims. c) Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished. d) Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment. e) If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities. Arguments Against the motion:
a) To assume that criminals are wicked and accordingly deserve punishment is wrong. Criminals are the products of the society they live in. They take to crime under unavoidable circumstances like extreme poverty. So, it is an injustice to punish criminals. The conditions for committing crimes are induced by the society that instigates people to commit crimes. b) There are several instances to show that criminals can be reformed. They are as normal as other human beings and are sensitive to sympathy and benevolence. c) We are no longer in a primitive society. So, giving punishment to the criminals is not in tune with the norms of a civilized society. d) Criminals do not deserve punishment as criminals are able to realise their wrong themselves in course of time.
Criminals deserve to be punished. Most of the people would not hesitate to claim that those who break the law should be punished ans]d put into prison as long as possible in case they continue to endager our lives and property. Also, if criminals are not given any punishment they may commit crimes again and again.Crime in general is the worst thing a person can do because it violates the law and it is a violation against the victims.Therefore, to protect the security of the society they should be punished according to the severity of the crime. So, regardless of what sort of crime someone is commiting they have to pay for their crime. and
One thing is clear – there are far too many people in American prisons. There are far too many ‘criminals ‘ in prison despite the fact that they pose no significant threat to society. As a result – otherwise productive citizens are sitting in a jail cell costing taxpayers money to look after. Despite this, there are many non-violent crimes which warrant jail time. Without this, the penalties for breaking the law might be so mild, that people will take calculated risks. For instance, when I was a child, I was told not to eat more than two cookies. However, the punishment if caught would be that I would have to return the excess cookies. Therefore, from my point of view, it made sense for me to always try and get away with extra cookies.
If the punishment had been a spanking, being grounded etc – then I would have factored in the risk, and would have decided against taking extra cookies. Imagine if CEO ‘s took the same view towards corporate fraud. Now, I am not suggesting that people who break any infraction of the law should go to prison, nor am I suggesting that the current system is perfect, or even remotely close to perfect for that matter. However, I do feel that there are many non-violent crimes which merit a prison term – not community service, not a suspended sentence, not house arrest and not probation – but prison. Here are a few examples:
1) Repeatedly driving drunk or with a suspended sentence.
2) Defrauding seniors out of their life savings.
3) Ignoring the constitution and illegally wiretapping American citizens.
4) Making hundreds of millions of dollars while falsifying documents to trick investors into investing in your company.
5) Selling crack.
Do we really want these people on the streets? Do we really want to give them a slap on the wrist? Do we really want to give these people a chance to escape and go to a South American country to retire? Absolutely not. These people might not kill, but they are every bit as dangerous as the drunk who punches a cop in the face.