Australia's Historical Policies: The Shadows of Racism

Introduction

As Australia ventured into the 20th century post-federation, latent concerns and prejudices that had simmered beneath the surface since colonization began manifested in governmental policies. Two particularly controversial policies, the 'White Australia Policy' and the 'Aboriginal Protection Act,' reflected a deep-rooted sense of white superiority fueled by Social Darwinism, economic fears, and political apprehensions. This essay delves into the racial, economic, and political dimensions of these policies, examining their lasting impact on Australia's societal fabric and emphasizing the imperative of learning from historical missteps.

The White Australia Policy

Racial Perspective

The 'White Australia Policy' was emblematic of the racial mindset that perceived non-white individuals as an inferior race. This ideology, rooted in Social Darwinism, painted them as dirty, foul, and uncivilized savages. The policy manifested through restrictive immigration measures and a promotion of white, European immigration. The Immigration Restriction Act, a key instrument, allowed non-whites entry only after passing a dictation test in a European language of the officer's choice.

Get quality help now

writer-Charlotte

Verified writer

Proficient in: Australia

4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Additionally, the Pacific Island Labourers Act aimed to expel Pacific Islanders who worked on sugar farms, further illustrating the pervasive racial bias.

Economic Perspective

Economic fears were a driving force behind the 'White Australia Policy,' particularly during the gold rush era. Australian workers harbored concerns that non-white individuals, especially Asians, would usurp jobs from their Australian counterparts. The influx of Chinese miners during the gold rush exacerbated these anxieties, as they amassed wealth, stoking fears of economic competition. There was a prevailing sentiment that non-white labor would undermine trade unions and the labor movement's pursuit of improved wages and working conditions.

Political Perspective

The political landscape also played a pivotal role in shaping the 'White Australia Policy.' Australia, as a vast continent with proximity to Asian nations, faced fears of an "Asian invasion." Politicians were driven by a desire to create a completely white society, free from perceived threats of crime and disease associated with Asian immigrants. Propaganda supporting these sentiments proliferated, featuring posters depicting disease, crime, and opium brought by Asians to defenseless white children. This xenophobic political atmosphere influenced the formulation and perpetuation of the policy.

Aboriginal Protection Act

Racial and Social Impact

The 'Aboriginal Protection Act' purported to safeguard a perceived "dying race," but, in reality, it curtailed the autonomy of Aboriginal communities. Placing them on reserves and isolating them from mainstream society, the act denied them the right to vote, receive basic wages, or access pensions. Furthermore, it granted the government control over Aboriginal parents' rights, managing custody, maintenance, and education. This marked the culmination of efforts to control the fate of the Aboriginal population under the guise of protection, illustrating the prevailing racial prejudices.

Economic Impact

Economically, the discriminatory views against Aboriginals hindered their job prospects. White Australians deemed Aboriginals uneducated and unfit for anything beyond labor-intensive jobs. The prevailing sentiment was so hostile that one politician went as far as declaring, "There is no scientific evidence that Aboriginals are even human." This economic marginalization further entrenched discriminatory practices, limiting opportunities for Aboriginal individuals in a variety of fields.

Political Motivations

Politically, the fear of an "Asian invasion" echoed in the background of the 'Aboriginal Protection Act.' Australia's geographical proximity to Asian nations fueled concerns about a demographic shift. Politicians envisioned an influx of Asians, particularly from Indonesia, Papua, Singapore, and South East Asia, which they believed would compromise the homogeneity of a white society. Propaganda, with images depicting the alleged perils brought by Asians, reinforced these political fears and influenced public opinion.

Reflection and Critique

While Australia takes pride in significant milestones such as Federation, it is crucial to acknowledge and critique the mistakes woven into its history. The discriminatory policies of the early 1900s, exemplified by the 'White Australia Policy' and the 'Aboriginal Protection Act,' persistently reflected white Australians' views in racial, economic, and political dimensions.

Despite the evolving societal norms, it's important to recognize that the notion of white superiority persisted until relatively recently. The 'White Australia Policy' remained in effect until 1973, with related policies continuing until 1982. The treatment of Aboriginals over two centuries has left a legacy of bitterness, underscoring the need for reflection and learning from past errors.

Conclusion

As a nation, Australia stands as a testament to the significance of learning from mistakes. Today, it proudly embraces multiculturalism, reaping the rewards of diversity. The journey from a racially discriminatory past to a multicultural present underscores the importance of evolving societal norms. In the words of a wise individual, "The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing." Australia's acknowledgment of its historical missteps serves as a foundation for building a more inclusive and enlightened society.