To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Ethical theories provide a framework for making moral decisions and guiding human behavior.
Two prominent ethical theories, deontology and utilitarianism, offer distinct perspectives on what constitutes moral action and responsibility. In this essay, we will delve into the principles, merits, criticisms, and practical applications of both deontology and utilitarianism to gain a deeper understanding of these ethical philosophies.
Deontology, derived from the Greek words "deon" (duty) and "logos" (study or science), is an ethical theory that emphasizes the importance of duty, obligation, and moral rules in guiding human behavior. Immanuel Kant, an influential German philosopher of the 18th century, is the foundational figure behind deontology. According to Kant, moral decisions should be made based on duty, irrespective of the consequences (Thompson et al. 2000; 364).
One fundamental aspect of deontology is the prioritization of ethical principles. Kant argued that moral actions must adhere to universal principles and that individuals should act in a way they would wish others to act as well.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Free Essays
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
This approach underscores the importance of treating humanity as ends in themselves and not merely as means to an end (Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals 1785).
Deontologists maintain that certain actions are intrinsically right or wrong, irrespective of their outcomes. For instance, lying and killing are considered morally impermissible in deontological ethics. Kant's categorical imperative, a central concept in deontology, dictates that individuals should act only according to maxims that they can will to become universal laws (Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals 1785).
Utilitarianism, in contrast to deontology, is a consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates the morality of actions based on their consequences, particularly their impact on overall happiness or pleasure.
Jeremy Bentham, an English philosopher of the late 18th century, is credited with founding utilitarianism, while John Stuart Mill further developed and popularized the theory (Simon Lee 1986; 22).
At its core, utilitarianism asserts that an action is morally right if it maximizes happiness and minimizes suffering. The central tenet of utilitarianism is the principle of utility, which holds that actions should aim to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people (Mill, Utilitarianism 1863). In essence, utilitarianism is a theory that prioritizes pleasure while minimizing pain.
Bentham proposed a hedonic calculus to quantify pleasure, considering factors such as intensity, duration, certainty, proportionality, fecundity, purity, and extent. This calculus was designed to aid in comparing and evaluating different actions based on their potential for generating pleasure (Bentham, The Principles of Morals and Legislation 1789).
While deontology and utilitarianism share a common goal of promoting ethical behavior, they diverge significantly in their principles and approaches. Let's explore the key similarities and differences between these two ethical theories:
Deontology places a strong emphasis on duty and moral rules, focusing on the intrinsic rightness or wrongness of actions. It asserts that certain actions, such as lying and killing, are inherently impermissible, regardless of their consequences. In contrast, utilitarianism prioritizes the consequences of actions, evaluating their impact on overall happiness. It does not consider actions as intrinsically right or wrong but rather assesses them based on the principle of maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain.
Deontology underscores the importance of individual rights and moral duties, advocating for actions that adhere to universal principles. It promotes ethical behavior based on duty, with moral decisions made irrespective of circumstances. On the other hand, utilitarianism may prioritize the collective happiness of the majority over individual rights, potentially leading to situations where the rights of some individuals are sacrificed for the greater good.
Practical applications of these ethical theories may vary in different scenarios. For example, in healthcare, deontology may guide healthcare professionals to prioritize their duty to provide honest and accurate information to patients, even if the truth may cause distress. This aligns with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) guidelines that emphasize truthfulness and accountability.
However, deontology's emphasis on duty and moral rules can sometimes lead to rigid ethical decisions, potentially neglecting the overall well-being of patients or other individuals involved. In contrast, utilitarianism may be more flexible in certain situations, as it seeks to maximize happiness and considers the consequences of actions. Ward managers, for instance, can use utilitarian principles to promote a positive work environment, enhancing the morale of nurses and, subsequently, the quality of patient care.
Like all ethical theories, deontology and utilitarianism face criticisms and limitations in their practical applications:
Deontology and utilitarianism represent contrasting ethical theories, each offering a unique perspective on moral decision-making. Deontology, rooted in duty and moral rules, highlights the intrinsic rightness or wrongness of actions and emphasizes individual rights and principles. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist theory, prioritizes the overall happiness of society, evaluating actions based on their consequences and the principle of maximizing pleasure.
In practical applications, both deontology and utilitarianism have their merits and limitations. Deontology guides individuals to adhere to moral duties and principles, ensuring ethical behavior based on universal rules. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, promotes flexibility and the pursuit of happiness, making it applicable in various contexts, including managerial decisions and healthcare settings.
Ultimately, the choice between these two ethical theories depends on the specific situation and the values and principles that individuals and organizations prioritize. By understanding the principles, merits, and criticisms of deontology and utilitarianism, individuals can make more informed and ethically sound decisions in their personal and professional lives.
Deontology vs. Utilitarianism: Ethical Theories in Perspective. (2020, Jun 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/utilitarianism-ethics-and-deontological-approach-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
