Hamlet: Beyond Revenge - Sympathy, Power, and Politics

Introduction to Revenge Tragedy

William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" occupies a distinctive place in the canon of English literature, notably within the genre of revenge tragedy, a category that flourished during the Elizabethan era. This genre, typified by works such as Shakespeare’s own "Titus Andronicus" and John Marston’s "Antonio’s Revenge," is characterized by its focus on themes of vengeance, justice, and the moral complexities of retribution. Audiences of the time would have approached "Hamlet" with the expectation of encountering these familiar narrative arcs, anticipating a storyline wherein the avenging hero navigates a straightforward path toward retributive justice.

However, Shakespeare disrupts these anticipations by weaving a narrative that is anything but predictable. Unlike its contemporaries, "Hamlet" introduces a protagonist who embodies the quintessential traits of an Aristotelian tragic hero, yet is thrust into circumstances that are fraught with unpredictability and moral ambiguity. This deviation from the norm not only challenges the audience's expectations but also serves to deepen the complexity of Hamlet’s character, thereby augmenting the audience's empathy towards him.

Get quality help now

Sweet V

Verified writer

Proficient in: Grief

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Hamlet's Grief

The introduction of Hamlet in the play is marked by a palpable sense of sorrow and desolation. Mourning the death of his father, the king, Hamlet's grief is visually represented through his somber attire and melancholic demeanor, a manifestation of his inner turmoil. This initial portrayal of Hamlet as a figure enveloped in grief immediately garners the audience's sympathy. The depth of Hamlet's sorrow is further highlighted by the stark contrast between his persistent mourning and the seemingly quick recovery of those around him, including his mother, Gertrude.

The latter's dismissive attitude towards death, as she remarks that all living things must eventually die, underscores a societal insensitivity to Hamlet's loss, isolating him in his grief.

The character of Claudius, Hamlet's uncle and the newly crowned king, introduces an additional layer of conflict. His criticism of Hamlet's mourning as "unmanly" and indicative of "impious stubbornness" not only reveals Claudius's own callousness but also serves to alienate Hamlet further from the court. This alienation is accentuated by Claudius's portrayal of Hamlet's grief as a series of faults against heaven, the dead, and nature itself. The rhetorical emphasis on the word "fault," coupled with the use of alliteration, reinforces the notion that Hamlet's sorrow is not merely a personal reaction to loss but a point of moral contention within the narrative. In this manner, Shakespeare crafts a scenario in which Hamlet, despite his royal status, is rendered profoundly alone in his mourning, a circumstance that engenders a deep sense of compassion within the audience.

This setup serves a dual purpose: it establishes the emotional foundation of the play and simultaneously challenges the conventional expectations of a revenge tragedy. Where most heroes of this genre are driven by a clear moral imperative to avenge a wrong, Hamlet's path is complicated by his intense personal grief and the lack of empathetic understanding from those around him. This complexity not only differentiates "Hamlet" from other revenge tragedies but also positions Hamlet as a more relatable and tragic figure in the eyes of the audience.

Gertrude's Marriage

The swiftness with which Gertrude, Hamlet’s mother, remarries following the death of King Hamlet introduces a critical and controversial element to the narrative, deepening the audience's sympathy for Hamlet. Her union with Claudius, the deceased king's brother, not only seems to contravene the norms of mourning but also borders on the taboo, evoking themes of incest and betrayal. Hamlet's soliloquy, wherein he laments the "wicked speed" of his mother's remarriage, serves as a poignant reflection on the transitory nature of grief and loyalty. By employing the metaphor of shoes that wore out too quickly, Shakespeare underscores the superficiality of Gertrude’s mourning, further isolating Hamlet in his grief.

This marriage, portrayed as both hasty and incestuous, compounds Hamlet's sense of betrayal. The term "incestuous sheets" is particularly evocative, highlighting Hamlet's disgust and disillusionment with his mother. It is through this lens that the audience begins to understand the genesis of Hamlet's misogynistic views, as he bitterly concludes that "Frailty, thy name is woman." This statement, far from being a mere expression of personal disdain, reflects a deeper disillusionment with the perceived fickleness and untrustworthiness of women, a theme that later extends to his interactions with Ophelia.

The rapid remarriage also raises questions about loyalty, love, and the sanctity of marriage. Hamlet grapples with the idea that the intense love his mother professed for his father could so quickly be transferred or forgotten. This betrayal is not only personal but symbolic, representing a breakdown of familial and societal bonds. The audience, through Hamlet's perspective, is invited to reflect on the nature of grief, the complexities of human relationships, and the pain of feeling betrayed by one's closest kin.

Moreover, the marriage serves as a catalyst for Hamlet's further alienation from the royal court and his increasing skepticism towards the motivations and morals of those around him. In this context, Gertrude's actions do not merely affect the personal realm but also have significant political implications, as they facilitate Claudius's ascent to the throne, further complicating the narrative's exploration of power, legitimacy, and succession.

Misogyny and Distrust

Hamlet’s reaction to his mother's remarriage and his subsequent treatment of Ophelia are indicative of a broader misogynistic disposition that permeates his worldview. This attitude, encapsulated in the phrase "Frailty, thy name is woman," reveals a profound disillusionment with the women in his life, whom he perceives as embodying betrayal and weakness. The audience is led to understand that Hamlet's misogyny is not inherent but rather a consequence of his experiences, particularly the actions of Gertrude. This revelation does not excuse Hamlet's behavior but rather contextualizes it within a narrative of loss and betrayal.

Hamlet's interactions with Ophelia serve as a further exploration of this theme. His harsh treatment of her, including his advice to "get thee to a nunnery," can be interpreted as an extension of his distrust towards women. However, this behavior also reflects Hamlet's broader existential crisis, as he grapples with the nature of sincerity, love, and loyalty in a world he perceives as fundamentally corrupt. Ophelia, in this context, becomes another victim of the tragic circumstances that envelop Hamlet, underscoring the collateral damage of Hamlet’s internal turmoil and the external machinations of the court.

The theme of misogyny in "Hamlet" is complex, intertwining personal grief with societal expectations and the corruption of ideals. It challenges the audience to consider the sources of Hamlet's attitudes towards women and the ways in which personal trauma can distort one’s worldview. Furthermore, it invites a critical examination of the gender dynamics of the time, highlighting how societal pressures and expectations can shape individual behavior and perceptions.

Issue of Succession

The intricacies of royal succession form a pivotal aspect of "Hamlet," introducing a political dimension to the personal and ethical dilemmas faced by the protagonist. The audience learns that despite the expectation of Hamlet's ascension to the throne following his father's death, Claudius assumes kingship. This unexpected turn of events is not merely a personal affront to Hamlet but also a significant deviation from traditional narratives of monarchical succession, where the direct heir typically ascends to the throne.

The elective nature of the Danish monarchy, revealed only later in the play, adds layers of complexity to the narrative. This detail, strategically withheld by Shakespeare until a critical moment, serves to heighten the drama surrounding the legitimacy of Claudius's rule. It underscores the political maneuvering that characterizes Claudius's ascent and highlights the tension between hereditary expectations and the realities of political power in Denmark.

Critics and characters within the play offer divergent views on Claudius's kingship. Some argue that Claudius, having been elected, rightfully occupies the throne. They point to his political astuteness, evidenced by his diplomatic efforts to avert conflict with Norway, as justification for his leadership. Others, however, suggest that Hamlet's absence during the election unjustly deprived him of the crown. They speculate that had Hamlet been present, his popularity with the people and rightful claim as the deceased king's son might have secured his election.

This debate not only deepens the political intrigue of the play but also amplifies the tragedy of Hamlet's situation. The audience is made to ponder the legitimacy of Claudius's rule and the potential for a different outcome had circumstances been altered. Furthermore, the revelation of Denmark's elective monarchy invites reflection on the nature of leadership and the qualifications for rulership, challenging the audience to consider the qualities that make a king worthy of the throne.

The issue of succession thus serves as a crucial backdrop against which the personal grievances and ethical dilemmas of the characters are played out. It reflects the broader themes of power, legitimacy, and justice that pervade the play, providing a rich tapestry against which the tragedy of Hamlet unfolds.

Political Commentary

The political undercurrents of "Hamlet" offer a nuanced exploration of authority, governance, and resistance. Claudius's election as king, despite the dubious circumstances surrounding his ascent, presents a complex portrait of political leadership and the mechanisms of power. The play engages with contemporary debates about the nature of monarchy and governance, particularly the distinction between hereditary and elected monarchies. By withholding the fact of Denmark's elective monarchy until later in the play, Shakespeare crafts a narrative that keeps the audience in suspense about the legitimacy of Claudius's rule and the potential for Hamlet's claim to the throne.

Critics of Claudius's kingship argue that his election, while legal, may not be morally justifiable, given the suspicions surrounding his involvement in King Hamlet's death. Supporters, on the other hand, point to Claudius's competence as a ruler, particularly his diplomatic efforts to maintain peace with Norway, as evidence of his suitability for the throne. This debate mirrors contemporary discussions about the qualities necessary for effective leadership and the ethical considerations that should guide the selection of rulers.

Furthermore, the political dynamics of the play reflect on the Elizabethan era's concerns with succession and the legitimacy of rule. Shakespeare's portrayal of an elective monarchy in Denmark serves as a subtle commentary on the anxieties surrounding the English throne at the time, including issues of succession and the legitimacy of monarchs. The distinction between hereditary and elected monarchies becomes a vehicle for exploring themes of power, authority, and the right to rule.

In this context, "Hamlet" transcends its narrative as a revenge tragedy to become a profound meditation on the nature of governance, the ethics of leadership, and the complex interplay between personal ambition and public duty. The political commentary embedded within the play invites the audience to reflect on the moral and ethical considerations that underpin the exercise of power, challenging simplistic notions of legitimacy and authority.