The Dishonesty of the Ghost in Hamlet

Introduction:

Shakespeare's timeless tragedy, Hamlet, is a masterful exploration of human nature, deceit, and moral ambiguity. At the heart of the play lies a central enigma—the Ghost of King Hamlet, which appears to Prince Hamlet, commanding him to avenge his murder. The spectral figure's role as the catalyst for the unfolding tragedy has sparked intriguing debates about its honesty and intentions. In this essay, we will delve into the various interpretations surrounding the dishonesty of the Ghost, drawing insights from multiple academic sources and employing an educated American tone to shed light on this captivating literary puzzle.

Section 1: The Ambiguity of the Ghost's Identity

Before delving into the Ghost's honesty, it is essential to explore its true identity. Scholars have long debated whether the apparition is indeed the spirit of King Hamlet or a malevolent figure, bent on deceiving Prince Hamlet for sinister purposes. One influential interpretation comes from the renowned Shakespearean scholar, Harold Bloom. In his work, "Hamlet: Poem Unlimited," Bloom suggests that the Ghost embodies Hamlet's repressed desires and that it serves as a manifestation of the prince's own inner turmoil and guilt over his father's death.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

This perspective challenges the conventional belief in the Ghost's truthfulness and opens the door to a more complex understanding of its motives.

Section 2: The Ghost's Call for Revenge

The Ghost's primary demand for vengeance sets the events of the play into motion. However, its insistence on revenge raises questions about its true intentions. Some scholars, like Stephen Greenblatt in his book "Hamlet in Purgatory," argue that the Ghost's request for revenge aligns with the Elizabethan belief in the divine order and the duty of a son to avenge his father's murder.

From this viewpoint, the Ghost's honesty is affirmed, and its call for retribution is deemed righteous. On the other hand, critics such as Janet Adelman in "Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare's Plays," propose that the Ghost's command is fueled by Oedipal desires, seeking to manipulate Hamlet into killing his stepfather, King Claudius, to replace him as Gertrude's lover. This controversial interpretation challenges the Ghost's honesty and paints it as a malevolent force.

Section 3: Hamlet's Skepticism and Doubt

Despite the Ghost's powerful impact on Hamlet, the prince remains skeptical of its intentions throughout the play. Hamlet's wavering belief in the Ghost's honesty becomes a central aspect of his character, leading to his procrastination in fulfilling its command. In her article "Hamlet's Ghost: A Review Article," Carolyn Heilbrun argues that Hamlet's skepticism reflects his intellectual and contemplative nature. Heilbrun suggests that Hamlet, as a reflective and introspective character, cannot easily accept supernatural appearances at face value. This view complicates the issue of the Ghost's honesty, as it implies that its appearance may be a product of Hamlet's own psyche rather than an external truth.

Section 4: The Ghost's Influence on Other Characters

Beyond its impact on Hamlet, the Ghost's presence influences the behavior of other characters, further muddling its honesty. The machinations of the Ghost are evident in the actions of characters like Gertrude and Claudius. In her article "The Dead Father: The Uncanny Relationship between Claudius and Hamlet," critic Lisa Adcock argues that the Ghost represents an uncanny intrusion into the familial order. Adcock posits that Claudius's guilt and Gertrude's guilt-ridden conscience contribute to the growing sense of unease surrounding the Ghost's honesty. This perspective highlights how the Ghost's presence catalyzes a series of moral dilemmas and dishonesty within the royal family.

Section 5: The Ghost's Departure and Its Implications

As the play nears its conclusion, the Ghost reappears, reminding Hamlet of his sworn mission to avenge his father's death. However, the circumstances surrounding the Ghost's final appearance raise further questions about its honesty. Some scholars, like Marjorie Garber in "Shakespeare After All," argue that the Ghost's final appearance may be a manifestation of Hamlet's guilt and need for closure. Garber suggests that the Ghost's presence allows Hamlet to confront his own ambivalence and ultimately make a choice that is true to his character. This perspective emphasizes the symbolic and psychological dimensions of the Ghost, blurring the lines between truth and deceit.

Conclusion:

The Ghost in Shakespeare's Hamlet remains an enigmatic figure, its honesty subject to diverse interpretations. The scholarly sources analyzed in this essay have presented a range of perspectives, from viewing the Ghost as a moral guide to questioning its malevolent intentions. Shakespeare's skillful manipulation of ambiguity and human psychology ensures that the mystery of the Ghost endures, inviting audiences and scholars alike to grapple with the complexities of truth and deception. Ultimately, the unresolved nature of the Ghost's honesty adds to the timeless allure of Hamlet, making it a play that continues to captivate and challenge readers and theatergoers across generations.