The Complex Implications of Banning Affirmative Action in College Admissions

Essay, Pages 3 (687 words)

Views

Introduction

The Supreme Court's recent decision to end affirmative action in college admissions marks a pivotal turning point in the fight for diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education. This ruling comes at a time when anti-critical race theory legislation and anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion policies are on the rise across many states. While the implications of banning affirmative action remain complex, higher education institutions now face difficult questions about how to maintain diverse, equitable campuses without the ability to consider race in admissions.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ The Complex Implications of Banning Affirmative Action in College Admissions ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

This essay will analyze the historical context behind banning affirmative action, the direct impact this policy change has on college admissions practices, and the broader threat it poses to achieving racial equity in higher education.

The Ongoing Fight Against Affirmative Action

Affirmative action policies emerged from the civil rights movement as a means to increase opportunities for marginalized racial groups in education and employment. The premise behind affirmative action is that considering race as one factor in college admissions is necessary to counteract historical and ongoing racial inequities.

However, affirmative action has continually faced backlash and legal challenges from opponents who argue it constitutes reverse discrimination against white applicants.

Landmark Supreme Court cases like Regents of the University of California v. Bakke in 1978 and Grutter v. Bollinger in 2003 upheld the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies. But recent cases like Fisher v. University of Texas in 2016 have weakened affirmative action. The current Supreme Court ruling stems from Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard and represents the culmination of a decades-long conservative effort to dismantle affirmative action.

Given the right-wing makeup of the current Court, the decision to ban affirmative action was expected but nonetheless represents a massive blow to racial equity in education.

The Direct Impact on College Admissions

Now that race cannot be considered in admissions, colleges and universities will need to fundamentally reinvent their practices to pursue diversity through race-neutral policies. However, research shows that in states like California and Michigan where affirmative action has already been eliminated, student body diversity suffered significantly at public universities. Alternative admissions practices like class-based affirmative action or percent plans that admit top graduates from each high school often fail to increase racial diversity.

Admissions officers now face difficult questions about how to evaluate applicants. Can essays or personal statements discuss obstacles faced due to one's racial identity? Can admissions decisions consider whether an applicant is the first in their family to attend college? The Supreme Court decision does not provide clear guidance on how colleges can holistically evaluate applicants while ignoring race. Eliminating affirmative action also places a tremendous burden on under-resourced high schools with large populations of students of color.

Threats to Racial Equity in Higher Education

Most concerning is how banning affirmative action threatens college access and equitable outcomes for students from marginalized racial groups. Hispanic and Black students are already significantly underrepresented proportional to their populations at top universities. Affirmative action has played a key role in counteracting systemic barriers these students face.

Without affirmative action, many selective colleges may revert to admitting primarily wealthy, white applicants. Consequently, students of color will become increasingly concentrated in under-resourced colleges that provide less social and economic mobility. Segregating higher education by race undermines the educational benefits of diversity for all students.

There are also alarming connections between the affirmative action decision and the wave of anti-CRT and anti-DEI efforts. The ruling could further embolden policies that silence diversity initiatives, ethnic studies programs, and anti-racist teaching. Dismantling affirmative action does not level the playing field, but instead preserves historical inequities in who has access to elite universities.

Conclusion

While this ruling poses significant threats to racial equity in higher education, colleges must persist in finding creative approaches to foster diverse, inclusive campuses without affirmative action. This will require dedicating more resources to actively recruiting students of color and providing robust support for their success once enrolled. The future of affirmative action remains uncertain, but higher education leaders can still safeguard diversity and social mobility despite legal restrictions. With concerted effort, colleges can still fulfill their mission to provide enriching educational experiences for all students in this challenging era.