24/7 writing help on your phone
Opening: Who here goes beyond the published speed limitation while driving? If a faster speed limitation was allowed, would you still go beyond the posted limit? Well, in Illinois, starting January first, 2014 you will legally be able to go just a little much faster on designated roads. I do not believe this is such an excellent change. Thesis: I think that raising the speed limitation will trigger more accidents and safety issues while increasing the consumption of fuel, which is bad for the environment and economy.
Sneak peek: Today I’m going to go over the negative elements, causes and services to raising the legal speed limitation on designated roads. I will share why I do not agree with the brand-new, faster speed limitation. Why does it matter: Raising the speed limitation can trigger more traffic accidents, resulting in more injuries and deaths. The increased speed will consume more fuel producing a negative effect on the environment and economy. The speed limit in Illinois ought to remain 65 miles per hour as presently posted on the roads.
I. Unfavorable elements: “What’s wrong?”
Significant subject: There are numerous problems associated with raising the speed limit. Presently, the legal speed limit is 65 miles per hour on rural four-lane highways. Many individuals believe it is okay to tackle 5 miles per hour over this posting (The news gazette). Raising the speed limit to 70 miles per hour will have individuals believe 75 miles per hour is acceptable (Legal Record). Why is it harmful?: Reaction times at increased speeds are reduced for drivers.
The ability to avoid a mishap or respond to a situation while taking a trip much faster produces more risks to all people, whether they are the motorist or passenger. The boost in speed likewise decreases the operating effectiveness of the cars, resulting in greater fuel consumption and operating expenses. The economy is impacted by this lower effectiveness and the environment is impacted by the increased production of fuel developed by the lower effectiveness. The environment is also affected by clean-up of automobile fluids that spill during a mishap, if they are cleaned up effectively at all.
II. Causes : “Why do we have the problem?”
Jerry Costello sponsored a bill to raise the existing speed limit from 65 to 70 miles per hour on rural four-lane highways. The Illinois House and Senate passed the bill and Governor Pat Quinn signed it into law (Chicago Tribune- Clout Street). Governor Quinn said “This limited five mile per hour increase will bring Illinois’ rural interstates speed limit in line with our neighbors and the majority of states across America” (Journal Star). However, the 86 miles per hour speed that motorists can still be charged with excessive speeding, will not change. State Representative Dan Brady disagrees. He believes that higher speed limits lead to higher personal injury (Huffington Post). Studies show 85 percent of the average driver on the interstate drives 72 to 74 miles per hour. He feels the 70 mile per hour speed limit will be abused by anywhere from 5 to 10 miles per hour (Legal Record). Studies show of the 34 states that have the 70 mile per hour speed limit in place, most have higher amounts of injuries and death tolls have risen as high as 9 percent. On average, 12,500 deaths are attributed to increased speed limits (Huffington Post). So far this year, on Illinois roadways, we are up to 855 deaths, and that is before the increased speed limit.
III. Solution: “How can we fix it?”
Procedure: The best way to keep the roadways safe, I believe, is to not alter the speed limit. With this being said, and the new speed limit already signed into law, the only responsible thing we can do at this point is to obey the new limit. Do not exceed the new limit as many people do 0the current limit. Future actions against the increased speed limit could be justified by a repeal of the law based on accidents and environmental impacts. This would require political actions that are not seen in the near future. I believe case studies should be recorded and reported to our government to demonstrate the dangers of the new, higher speed limit. Case Studies: Each state that raised their speed limit to 70 miles per hour experienced an increase in the average amount of deaths each year. Every state with speed limits higher than 65 miles per hour showed an increase in deaths that ranging from 7 percent to 13 percent. The study on the raised speed limit has been conducted for eight years (Huffington Post). In each of these years, the average annual fatalities have been higher since the speed limits were increased (Huffington Post).
I believe that raising the speed limit on rural four-lane highways will cause more accidents and safety issues while increasing the consumption of fuel, which is bad for the environment and economy. The justification for the increase by the government to match the speed limit of our neighboring states is not supported by the data. Case studies prove that the increase in speed is dangerous for both drivers and passengers. The environmental and economic impacts must be considered too. I do not support raising the speed limit and I believe the speed limit should remain 65 miles per hour on rural Illinois highways.
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment