24/7 writing help on your phone
The 2008 documentary Food Inc focuses on corporate farming in the United States. It poses questions about the unsustainability of cultural practices that are both harmful to the environment, the animals, and the consumer. These practices are the cornerstones of corporations such as Monsanto, which dominates the agricultural business in the United States. The film highlights how the downsides of Industrialisation, unfair trade, and the downsides of forced neoliberalisation combine to illustrate the limits and dangers of corporate farming. From an environmental sociological perspective, Food Inc can be analyzed through the following concepts and trends.
Human-environment interaction, Human Exceptionalism Paradigm (HEP)
Human-environment interaction and lack recognizance of the Existential Doctrine of the combine to dominate the philosophy of corporate agriculture.
In 1980, American Sociologist Allan Schnaiberg developed a conflict theory on human-environment interaction. He suggests that the collapse of the Mayan civilization was proof that cultures are vulnerable to ecological suicide. As discussed in class Earth Day of 1970 marked a new age of environmentally conscious and awareness.
This modern ecological though suggested a new perspective that took environmental variables into account. In the latter half of the 20th century, biological determinism failed to fully explain the relationship between humans and the environment. The process contains a chief paradox; economic growth is socially desired, but environmental degradation is a common consequence that in turn disrupts long-run economic expansion (Schnaiberg 1980).
The HEP theory claims that humans are such a uniquely superior species that they are exempt from environmental forces. This, as demonstrated through the industry practices by Monstano and others, is a key component in Food Inc.
The belief that Humans had the capacity to accumulate and innovate, therefore making us capable of solving all-natural problems. This theory states that while the earth has a finite level of natural resources and waste repositories, the innovative capacity of humans will prevail. Further, the theory states that growth in production will in fact lead to a growth in consumption. We see the film reference the cheap but unhealthy meals sold at fast-food chains which are far cheaper than healthier alternatives. The example used is that you can purchase a double cheeseburger for a dollar, but ahead of broccoli costs around two dollars. It is clear that the corporations subscribe to the idea that any potential environmental can be circumnavigated using human ingenuity.
Another compelling point that the bring that the film brings up is that they’re only a few major companies that present the illusion of choice through a variety of France but in actuality, many of them are owned by the same company. perspectives voiced in food Inc take the form of a lobbying/activist narrative about the huge business of bolstering or forcibly feeding Americans all the garbage that worldwide corporate cash can produce. New sentence Taylor Moore’s perspectives in the film are voiced by seasoned Andres experts of the food industry including Michael Pollan writer of in defense of food and the Omnivore’s Dilemma dilemma and eric Schlosser creator of inexpensive Food Nation. Although the film highlights and investigates the creature’s mystery I mistakenly sign of primary Spotlight on the human expense of the corporate farming business. Highlights. With lower-income are economically Co-op into purchasing inexpensive foods cheaper than dirt healthier alternatives.
The documentary explores the Savage Monopoly created by the agrarian monster Monsanto. Large food corporations use their massive wealth and power to conform to government legislation to their benefit. The historic roots of this problem go back to the 1950s where government legislation subsidized American corn making it extremely cheap. This has resulted in corn, or a corn product being utilized in a very wide variety of foods. This corn is further fed to animals who are not historically used to consuming it. The documentary explores the immediate human-caused of industrial food production. Examples such as e-cold meats, two local farmers being intimidated by Monsanto through legal action to read to buy seeds that do not regrow after they are harvested, forcing the farmer to then buy more. Perspectives address in this film are unique as they intertwine social realities to environmental realities.
Environmental sociology is the study of the connections between human societies and their natural environment. Human ecology examines how cultures change in response to climate change. Corporate agriculture seems entrenched despite any critiques of global food. Food Inc demonstrates that while efforts to create local food systems that are more sustainable, equitable, and economically viable they have not been incorporated by mega agricultural corporations in the United States. These corporations demonstrate the limitations of Western models of development, as well as a misunderstanding of sustainability and ecological resilience in lieu of a blindly optimistic view of human innovation.
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment