Solomon Asch: The Man Behind the Conformity Experiments

The conformity experiment was conducted in 1951 by Solomon Asch, he was a Polish-American gestalt psychologist, and he did much of his works in the field of social psychology, during the conformity experiment he wanted to find out why people conformed so readily, therefore the aim of this piece of work is to give the critics of Asch’s 1951 experiment on group conformity, furthermore, it will start defining the key term in the question, followed by the discussion and at the end, a comprehensive conclusion will be drawn.

Conformity is a type of social influence involving a change in belief in order to fit in with a group. Therefore one drawback of the observer with respect to the experiment is that a biased sample was used. All of the individuals had been male students who all belonged to the equal age group. This means that the study lacks population validity and that the outcomes cannot be generalized to girls or older agencies of human beings.

Get quality help now

Writer Lyla

Verified writer

Proficient in: Deception

5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Even more, the test used an artificial undertaking to degree conformity. This means that the study has low ecological validity and the outcomes cannot be generalized to other real-life situations of conformity (Asch, 1952). Additionally, some critics thought the excessive ranges of conformity located by Asch had been a mirrored image of American, 1950's way of life and advised us greater about the historical and cultural climate of the USA inside the 1950s than then they do about the phenomena of conformity. Conformity to American values turned into something which they could predict.

(Perrin & Spencer, 1980).

Perrin & Spencer (1980). Cautioned that the Asch impact became an "infant of its time." They finished an actual replication of the unique Asch experiment using engineering, mathematics, and chemistry students as subjects. They found that on most effective one out of 396 trials did an observer be a part of the erroneous majority. They argued that cultural exchange has taken region inside the value located on conformity and obedience and in the function of students. One problem in comparing this examines with Asch is that very different forms of members are used. The students used were probably expected to be greater impartial by means of education while it got here to making perceptual judgments. Subsequently, there are moral problems: individuals have been now not covered from the psychological strain which might also arise if they disagreed with the general public. It has been observed that contributors in the Asch situation had greatly multiplied degrees of autonomic arousal. This finding additionally shows that they have been in a battle state of affairs, finding it difficult to decide whether or not to document what they saw or to conform to the opinion of others (Asch, 1956). Asch also deceived the student volunteers claiming they had been taking component in an 'imaginative and prescient' check; the real cause became to peer how the naive player could react to the behavior of the confederates. However, deception changed into important to provide legitimate results (Asch, 1951).

In sum, the paper has outlined some of the critics of Asch 1951 experiment. And they are as follows; used Biased sample, it believed the experiment was a mirrored image of the America 1950 way of life, the study has low ecological validity, and that Asch deceived the student volunteers claiming they had been taking component in an 'imaginative and prescient' check. Research has shown that the experiment somehow affected the participants psychologically.