To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Susan Glaspell's play, "Trifles," delves into the intricate web of social and psychological differences between the male and female characters. The central theme revolves around the chauvinistic attitudes displayed by the male characters, juxtaposed with the more understanding and perceptive nature of the female characters, particularly when attempting to unravel the mystery of Mr. Wright's murder. The men's dismissive views towards women, combined with discriminatory behaviors, hinder their ability to discern the truth at the crime scene, ultimately leading to a flawed investigation.
The male characters in "Trifles" exhibit a chauvinistic attitude that permeates their approach to the investigation.
Their prejudices manifest prominently when assessing the crime scene at the Wright House. Rather than adopting an objective stance, their negative views towards women and a discriminatory perception of the opposite sex blind them to the nuances of the situation. This blinkered perspective results in the hasty branding of Mrs. Wright as the murderer, with little consideration for her emotions or state of mind at the time of the crime.
While scrutinizing the evidence, the county attorney expresses disdain for Mrs.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Philosophy
5 (234)
“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”
Wright's homemaking skills, emphasizing dirty towels and criticizing her housekeeping abilities. His irritated comment reflects a belief that women, as homemakers, should adhere to certain standards. This sentiment is reinforced when he defends his opinion by comparing other farmhouses, displaying a lack of respect for women's societal roles. The men's dismissive attitudes not only hinder the investigation but also perpetuate gender stereotypes, clouding their judgment and obstructing a fair analysis of the crime.
In stark contrast, the female characters in "Trifles" display heightened perceptiveness and sympathy, providing a counterbalance to the men's biased approach.
From the outset, the women focus on the "little things," recognizing Mrs. Wright's efforts in maintaining her household, despite its imperfections. Their sympathy stems from a shared understanding of the challenges of running a household, a dimension overlooked by the men. Unlike their male counterparts, the women approach the investigation with a genuine curiosity and a desire to comprehend the underlying reasons for Mr. Wright's murder.
They recall Mrs. Wright's transformation from a lively and singing woman to a reclusive figure after marrying Mr. Wright, prompting them to question the stability of her marriage. The women, actively engaging with the case, discover the bird cage and the dead bird in the sewing box. Drawing a poignant parallel between Mrs. Wright and the bird, they note the change in her demeanor. Their findings, rooted in facts and evidence, stand in stark contrast to the indifferent attitudes of the men. Despite their sympathy for Mrs. Wright, the women conceal the bird as evidence from the sheriff and the county attorney, introducing a moral dilemma that adds complexity to the narrative.
The play vividly portrays a stark divide in attitudes between the sexes, revealing the men's harsh, critical, and self-centered nature, juxtaposed with the women's intuitive, cautious, and sensitive approach. These differences result in contrasting opinions on the facts of the case. The men's preconceived judgments on women impede their ability to objectively assess the situation, while the women perceive aspects overlooked by their male counterparts.
Despite the men's failure to gather substantial evidence, the women make a crucial discovery—the broken bird cage and the dead bird. However, the women, despite their sympathy, choose to hide the evidence, committing a moral transgression similar to the men's judgmental attitudes. This nuanced exploration suggests that both the emotional nature of women and the judgmental attitudes of men can impede a fair and objective pursuit of justice.
In conclusion, Susan Glaspell's "Trifles" serves as a thought-provoking exploration of gender dynamics, revealing the consequences of chauvinism and emotional responses in the pursuit of justice. The play prompts reflection on societal expectations, biases, and the complexities of human behavior. Through the lens of a murder investigation, Glaspell invites the audience to question the implications of gender roles and consider the limitations imposed by preconceived notions. Ultimately, "Trifles" challenges us to examine our own perspectives and biases, urging a more empathetic and objective approach in the face of human complexities.
Unraveling Gender Biases: Dynamics in 'Trifles' by Susan Glaspell. (2017, Jan 03). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/social-and-psychological-differences-in-trifles-by-susan-glaspell-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
