To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Human beings possess a complex system of ethics and morals that guide their actions, allowing them to distinguish between right and wrong. In most cases, individuals behave in accordance with their personal morality. However, extensive research in the field of social psychology has demonstrated that under certain circumstances, individuals can be compelled to act in direct opposition to their deeply held morals and ethics. This essay explores the concepts of obedience to authority and deindividuation, shedding light on how these factors can influence human behavior.
To provide a comprehensive analysis, we will delve into and compare the seminal studies conducted by Stanley Milgram in 1963 on obedience and Philip Zimbardo's 1973 experiment on deindividuation.
Stanley Milgram's research aimed to investigate the phenomenon of obedience by using the cover story that he was conducting research on the effects of punishment on learning. Participants were recruited from various backgrounds and were informed that they would receive payment merely for participating in the experiment, regardless of the outcome.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Human
4.8 (309)
“ Writer-marian did a very good job with my paper, she got straight to the point, she made it clear and organized ”
The setup involved a teacher and a learner, with the participant always assuming the role of the teacher. The teacher witnessed the learner being strapped into an 'electric chair' intended for administering electric shocks. Although the learner was informed that the shocks might be painful, they would not cause permanent damage.
The teacher was then placed in a separate room with a 'shock generator' containing thirty switches, ranging from 0 to 450 volts in 15-volt increments. Each switch had labels such as "slight shock," "moderate shock," and so on, indicating increasing levels of pain.
The teacher was tasked with a word association exercise, where each incorrect response by the learner prompted the teacher to administer a higher voltage shock. The learner's responses included grunts, complaints about pain, and eventually, agonized cries. Throughout the experiment, the participants displayed visible signs of distress, including sweating, trembling, and even self-inflicted harm.
The most startling finding was that approximately 65% of participants continued administering shocks until they reached the highest voltage, despite their evident discomfort and objections. Milgram's experiment challenged the prevailing belief that people would refuse to inflict significant harm on others, highlighting how normal, intelligent individuals could engage in violent and destructive acts when placed in specific circumstances where they perceived an authority figure commanding them.
Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment aimed to explore the concept of deindividuation, where individuals lose their sense of self-identity and personal responsibility in group settings. In this study, a simulated prison environment was created in the basement of Stanford University's psychology building. Volunteers underwent rigorous screening to ensure emotional stability before being randomly assigned roles as either guards or prisoners.
Prisoners were unexpectedly arrested, subjected to various humiliating procedures, and placed in confined cells. Guards, in standard uniforms and armed with nightsticks, were given the authority to maintain order and established their own rules. Quickly, the participants embraced their assigned roles, with guards engaging in degrading behavior such as making prisoners clean toilets with their bare hands and using physical punishments for minor infractions.
The experiment was originally planned to last two weeks but had to be terminated after only six days due to the guards' escalating brutality. Many prisoners experienced severe emotional distress and begged to be released. The study concluded that, under specific situational variables, individuals could be made to commit acts against their morals, ethics, and personal convictions. Zimbardo's research led to the profound realization that many people, when placed in psychologically compelling situations, could be compelled to do almost anything, regardless of their fundamental values and beliefs.
These studies provide valuable insights into human nature and the field of social psychology. They underscore the significance of situational variables in determining behavior. Zimbardo's experiment illustrates how deindividuation, characterized by anonymity and a diminished sense of self-awareness in a group, can lead to antisocial or aggressive actions.
Similarly, Milgram's study reveals the powerful influence of authority figures on behavior, as people are often conditioned to obey those in positions of power. These findings challenge the assumption that individuals will invariably act in accordance with their personal values, regardless of external pressures.
Deindividuation involves a complex chain of events, starting with anonymity in a group setting, leading to a loss of self-awareness, reduced concern for evaluations by others, and a narrowed focus of attention. These factors, when combined, can lower inhibitions against antisocial or aggressive behavior. Zimbardo's prison experiment vividly illustrates these concepts.
In the case of obedience to authority, individuals may follow orders from perceived authorities or those they expect to be obeyed. Cultural norms and roles also shape people's expectations of obedience. This dynamic is evident in Zimbardo's prison study, where the guards and prisoners assumed dominant and submissive roles, respectively.
The results of these studies have profound implications for society. They demonstrate that normal, healthy, and intelligent individuals can engage in acts that run counter to their inherent nature when placed in specific situations. This insight is essential for understanding and preventing acts of violence, aggression, and blind obedience to authority figures.
Deindividuation can help explain behaviors observed in crowds, such as rioting, where individuals may engage in actions they would not normally undertake as individuals. Understanding the influence of authority figures can contribute to preventing events similar to those instigated by dictators like Saddam Hussein and Adolf Hitler, where people followed orders regardless of their own moral values.
In conclusion, obedience to authority and deindividuation are powerful forces that can significantly impact human behavior. The studies conducted by Milgram and Zimbardo provide valuable insights into the malleability of human conduct under specific circumstances. These experiments underscore the importance of situational variables in shaping behavior and challenge the notion that individuals will always act in accordance with their deeply held morals and ethics. As we continue to explore the intricacies of human psychology, these studies serve as important reference points for understanding the complexity of human nature.
The Influence of Obedience and Deindividuation on Human Behavior. (2016, Jul 13). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/obediance-and-deindividuation-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
