To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
As counselors navigate the complex landscape of their profession, they inevitably encounter ethical dilemmas that challenge their decision-making prowess. The ability to make sound ethical decisions is paramount in the counseling field, as counselors assume responsibility for the ethical and legal implications of their clients' actions (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2001). This essay explores the ethical decision-making models proposed by Forester-Miller and Davis, as well as Corey, shedding light on their similarities, differences, and the preferences of practicing counselors.
Forester-Miller and Davis crafted a comprehensive seven-step decision-making model that directs counselors in addressing ethical problems systematically.
The model begins by identifying the problem, then applies the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics to frame the dilemma. Subsequently, counselors determine the nature and dimensions of the ethical dilemma, generate potential courses of action, consider the potential consequences, make a decision, evaluate the selected course of action, and finally, implement it.
A survey conducted in 2000 among licensed professional counselors revealed that 61.9 percent preferred Forester-Miller and Davis's model when confronted with ethical issues (Elwyn, Gray, & Clarke, 2000).
Verified writer
Proficient in: Decision Making
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
This widespread preference underscores the model's relevance and effectiveness in the counseling profession.
In contrast, Corey proposed an eight-step decision-making model that places a strong emphasis on the client's involvement and the therapeutic relationship. The steps in Corey's model include identifying the problem, identifying potential issues, reviewing relevant ethical guidelines, understanding relevant laws and regulations, seeking consultation, considering possible courses of action, listing consequences, and ultimately deciding on the best course of action.
Researcher Vandecreek (2006) suggested that Corey's model is particularly effective when clients are fully engaged in the counseling process and when a robust therapeutic relationship is established.
Corey's focus on the client's ability to adjust to the chosen course of action sets his model apart from Forester-Miller and Davis's approach.
Forester-Miller and Davis, and Corey, despite sharing commonalities, exhibit notable differences in their ethical decision-making models. Corey's model places a significant emphasis on the client's role in adapting to the chosen course of action, fostering a sense of inclusion in the decision-making process. In contrast, Forester-Miller and Davis concentrate on the consistency and appropriateness of decision-making across various clients (Knapp & VandeCreek, 2006). They stress the importance of evaluating consequences at each stage of the decision-making process.
Both models share foundational steps, such as problem identification and reference to ethical guidelines. However, Corey's model includes a distinct section for obtaining consultation, whereas Forester-Miller and Davis incorporate consultation into the step of generating potential courses of action. While obtaining consultation may be time-consuming, it proves valuable in ensuring the best course of action aligns with the client's needs.
Deciding on the most suitable decision-making model hinges on various factors, and counselors must carefully consider the unique aspects of each case. Thorough research into the potential courses of action is essential, regardless of the chosen model. Personally, I find Corey's model to be my preferred choice.
Although the consultation phase in Corey's model may extend the decision-making process, seeking guidance from more experienced professionals is crucial. Moreover, Corey's client-centric approach aligns with my belief that placing the client at the forefront enhances the therapeutic relationship in the long run. In the dynamic field of counseling, the ability to adapt and choose the best decision-making model for the client's benefit remains paramount.
Ethical decision-making is a critical aspect of the counseling profession, requiring counselors to navigate complex dilemmas with care and consideration. Forester-Miller and Davis's seven-step model and Corey's eight-step model offer valuable frameworks for addressing ethical challenges, each with its unique strengths. Counselors must weigh the merits of each model, considering factors such as the nature of the ethical dilemma, the client's involvement, and the strength of the therapeutic relationship.
While Forester-Miller and Davis prioritize consistency and appropriateness, Corey places a distinct emphasis on the client's role in the decision-making process. The survey indicating the widespread preference for Forester-Miller and Davis's model among licensed professional counselors underscores its practicality and relevance in real-world scenarios. Ultimately, the choice between these models rests on the counselor's judgment and the specific requirements of the counseling situation.
Ethical Decision Making in Counseling: A Comparative Analysis. (2016, Oct 03). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/models-of-ethical-decision-making-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
