Military And Professional Bearing In The United States Army

Professional soldiers in the Army are very important to have now and days we have too many bad habits from leaders that do not show military bearing. Professionals in the Army have changed a lot over the years from toxic leadership. Leaders should be bonded to the Soldier and shared identity, and opinions to better the Soldier under them. Army Profession According to Army times “living by and upholding the standard and moral principles of the Army ethic”. Army professionals is having moral living by the Army values which are Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, And Personal Courage.

The army profession is upholding the standard. If Soldier Fail to be a professional or do not understand the concept of behavior based on ideas, culture, or religion about what is morally good or bad will fail as a team or group. Army leader needs to set the standard and enforce them. Professional is more than just work it is how you carry yourself professionally.

Get quality help now

KarrieWrites

Verified writer

Proficient in: Army

5 (339)

“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Military Discipline needs to teach more to set that standard, military and professional bearing. Leaders need to understand that saying inappropriate or having a dirty uniform is setting a bad standard. Self-discipline in the military is where soldiers need guidance and scripture to uphold the military standard and live by them. A leader needs to show discipline and scripture instead of trying to be friends and showing no military and professional bearing. Characteristics of a bad leader are being boastful, arrogant, and toxic. Toxic leaders do not want anyone's opinion on anything other than their opinion.

The unprofessional acts or inappropriate talks in the workplace will interfere with other workers' performance and their discipline if worse can destroy the professional in the workplace. The ideal relationships you want to establish with your Soldier are trusted Leadership, guidance, and discipline if needed. Trust is the skill that soldiers need to depend on you and each other. Trust is important to have in a team. Trust is defined as relying upon or placing confidence in someone or something. Soldier trust their leader to perform their duty and to lead them and their country. A great way to gain trust is to communicate and show respect to your soldier.

Trust is also gained by listening to your soldier and helping them develop into leaders. If your team has no trust in one another it's hard to trust that other person to hold their own. Military Expertise in chapter three according to ADRP1 says “Military experience is the design, generation, support, and ethical application of land power, primarily in the unified land operation, and all supporting capabilities essential to accomplish the mission in defense of the American people.' Military Experience is to be knowledgeable and good at your job. Honorable service has to do with actions, honesty, fairness, and worth respect. An honorable person is someone who believes in truth and does what is right. Unacceptable behavior is when leaders act like friends instead of leaders behavior like this is toxic having around. Some unprofessional circumstances are offensive, belittling, abusive, or making fun of another person's religion, race and looks. A great leader possesses a clear vision and a positive attitude. Great leaders help their soldiers to reach their goals and have the skill to help other soldiers better others. Solder to reach their goals and accomplishments. A great leader possesses a clear vision, is courageous, has integrity, honesty, humility, and clear focus according to learn by example is said: “Great leaders need to help each other reach their goals are not afraid”.

Stewards of the profession are something you develop as a leader. The three C's of the Army profession are competence, character, and commitment According to Army time. First and foremost a soldier needs to be competent. This does not mean he/she needs to be the best at everything. It does not mean that he/ she can’t take on the mentally, physically, and emotionally able to perform the tasks that are needed. Competence is demonstrated as having the ability to successfully perform their duties and task to accomplish the Mission to standard. In an appliance with to Army values “Character is defined as dedication and adherence to the Army Values and Ethics as consistently being loyal, trustworthy, open to opinions and faithfully to you Soldier.” The commitment of Army professionals is to contribute and have honorable Service to your unit and team to perform their duties to standard.

In conclusion. According to Dr. Don M. Snider stated “the Army is a profession because of the expert work it produces, because the people in the Army develop themselves to be professionals, and because the Army certifies them as such.” Professional is the way you carry yourself and live up to the standard by following AR 600-1. when you preach to your Soldier you must also do something. For your soldier to respect you and see you as a good leader, you need to live by what you preach.

Works cited

1. Army Doctrine Reference Publication (ADRP) 1. (2021). The Army Profession. U.S. Army. Retrieved from [URL]
2. Army Times. (n.d.). Living the Army Ethic: What it means to be an Army professional. Retrieved from [URL]
3. Dineen, B. R., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2014). Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee performance: An exchange-based perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 574-583. doi:10.1037/a0035757
4. Ensari, N., & Murphy, S. E. (2018). Managing ethical lapses and misconduct in organizations: A research-based framework. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 156-163. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.04.001
5. Johnson, J. P., & Indvik, J. (2004). Relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and follower perceptions of leader effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(1), 58-72. doi:10.1108/01437730410512702
6. Latham, G. P., & Pinder, C. C. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485-516. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105
7. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764-775. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
8. MacGregor, J. (2020). The Army ethic. U.S. Army Combined Arms Center. Retrieved from [URL]
9. Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591-622. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
10. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305