To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Life transitions mark significant psychological and environmental changes in an individual's life journey. These transitions can have a profound impact on an individual's development, influencing their relationships, psychological well-being, and environment. In this essay, we will explore the ecological perspective of human development through Bronfenbrenner's social ecological model. We will examine how this model can be applied to understand the complexities of life transitions, using personal experiences as examples. Additionally, we will discuss other relevant theories such as Harms' model, Gibson's perspective, and the concepts of resilience and vulnerability in the context of life transitions.
Bronfenbrenner's social ecological model provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing the various levels of influence on an individual's development.
This model consists of four interconnected systems: the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, and macrosystem. Additionally, it incorporates the concept of the chronosystem, which highlights changes in ecological contexts over time (Shaffer & Kipp, 2006).
The microsystem, according to Bowes and Hayes (1999), represents the immediate environment in which an individual interacts daily.
It includes relationships with family, peers, school, and other significant figures. These interactions shape an individual's behaviors, expectations, and values.
In my personal life transition from high school to university in Bendigo, I experienced significant stress within my microsystem. The relationships between my home and school environments became strained, leading to a negative impact on my psychological well-being. However, as illustrated in Figure 2, once the stressors abated, a strong positive relationship emerged. This example highlights how a negative microsystem relationship can evolve into a powerful mesosystem agent that influences an individual's development positively.
The exosystem, as described by Garbarino (1992), includes settings in which an individual is not directly involved but still exerts an indirect influence through the meso or microsystem.
In my case, the relationship between my father and his workplace, as shown in Figure 1, did not directly affect me. However, his increased working hours during my transition to university led to a decreased connection between us due to reduced time spent together.
The macrosystem, as defined by Bowes, Grace, and Hayes (2012), encompasses broader societal and cultural contexts, including belief systems and values that permeate the micro and mesosystems. For example, government funding for rural students, such as myself, to study away from home significantly eased my financial transition to university. This demonstrates how macro-level influences can facilitate smoother life transitions.
The chronosystem, according to Shaffer and Kipp (2006), emphasizes changes in ecological contexts over time. In my personal transition, the sudden death of my father was a pivotal event that not only changed me as an individual but will continue to impact me throughout my life span. This event illustrates the dynamic nature of life transitions and their long-term consequences.
Harms (2010) introduced a multidimensional approach within Bronfenbrenner's model, considering both the individual's inner world and their environment. While Harms and Bronfenbrenner's models differ in some dimensions, they share a connection in multiple ways. Similarly, Gibson's theoretical framework also underscores the relationship between the individual and their environment, focusing on change over time (Tudge, Gray, & Hogan, 1997).
The concept of a developmental niche, as defined by Harkness and Super (1994), considers the unique processes that shape an individual, including physical and social settings, culturally regulated customs, and the psychology of the individual. A developmental niche can be seen in the formation of close friendships based on mutual interests, exemplifying the influence of interpersonal relationships on development.
Resilience and vulnerability play crucial roles in individual development during life transitions. Initially, I may have been considered vulnerable as I faced significant changes. However, as protective factors, such as forming new relationships within my microsystem, increased, I became resilient, adapting successfully to the transition (Miller et al., 2010).
Life transitions represent pivotal moments in an individual's journey, encompassing psychological and environmental changes. Bronfenbrenner's social ecological model offers a valuable framework for comprehending the multifaceted influences on development, ranging from the microsystem to the macrosystem and even the chronosystem. By applying this model, we can gain insights into the complexities of life transitions and their lasting effects on individuals.
Furthermore, other ecological models, such as Harms' and Gibson's, provide additional perspectives on the dynamic interplay between the individual and their environment. The concept of a developmental niche highlights the significance of unique processes in an individual's development. Finally, the notions of resilience and vulnerability underscore the adaptability and challenges individuals face during life transitions.
In summary, life transitions are multifaceted experiences that shape an individual's development in profound ways. By examining these transitions through ecological frameworks and considering factors such as resilience and vulnerability, we can gain a deeper understanding of the intricate processes at play during these critical moments in our lives.
An Ecological Analysis of Life Transitions and Its Effects. (2016, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/life-transitions-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment