Insurable interest case study

Adia owns a house and has an elderly third cousin living with her. Adia decides she needs fire insurance on the house and a life insurance policy on her third cousin to cover funeral and other expenses that will result from her cousin's death. Adia takes out a fire insurance policy from Ajax Insurance Co. and a $10,000.00 life insurance policy from Beta Insurance Co. on her third cousin. Six months later, Adia sells the house to John and transfers the title to him.

Adia and her cousin move into an apartment. With two months remaining on the Ajax policy, a fire totally destroys the house, at the same time, Adia's third cousin dies. Both insurance companies tender back premiums but claim they have no liability under the insurance contracts, as Adia did not have an insurable interest.

Insurable interest can be established through either pecuniary (monetary), or relationship.

Pecuniary interest can be established by ownership or interest in property either personal or real.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Case Study

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Individuals may insure property that they have an insurable interest in.

Insurable interest based in relationship can be established through either close blood relation or affinity. This prevents life insurance from being used as a gambling tool. If persons could simply insure strangers then the possibility of gambling on the life span of another could become an issue.

Blood relations can be parents and children, brothers and sisters, grandparents and grandchildren, and husbands and wives. Life insurance policies are based upon an insurable interest that must exist at the time the policy is issued.

Therefore, if spouses divorce, unless the policy contains a clause to terminate upon divorce, the policy may be maintained.

Affinity

In the case presented, Ajax Insurance Co. is correct to not pay the claim, and only return premiums, since at the time of the loss John was the title holder. Therefore, the insurable interest belonged to John not to Adia.

Beta Insurance Co. made an error in not paying the $10,000.00. The insurance company established an insurable interest at the time the policy was issued or it would not have issued it in the first place.

Adia and her third cousin had a blood relation, however, not a close relation. The insurable interest would have stemmed from affinity. Adia cared for her elderly third cousin and was concerned about the expenses associated resulting from death including funeral expenses. According to Robert Whitesel with American Family insurance, the policy would not have been issued without first establishing an insurable interest. It could then be concluded that the claim should be paid and the unused premiums should be refunded.