Implicit Expression of One's Participation in an Intimate Act

Essay, Pages 3 (739 words)

Views

Yolanda Estes defines mutual respect as necessities from both intimate partners conveying explicit or implicit expression of their participation in the intimate act. Estes’ criteria for mutually respectful ethical sex, is as each partner demonstrating concern for other’s interests and their personal health extending beyond their sexual wellbeing. Moreover, it enforces that both sexual partners are present to one another’s desires. Yolanda bases her criteria upon reciprocal consent, concern, and desire. Reciprocal consent, Yolanda defines it as, both partners show that she or he chooses to engage reproductive activities at a precise time.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ Implicit Expression of One’s Participation in an Intimate Act ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

In other words, without someone’s indication that she or he is a willing partner, we can suspect they continue to remain a compelled victim of being intimidated.

Yolanda defines reciprocal concern as each partner ostensive regard for his partner’s personal, human and moral prosperity. Yolanda argues it's crucial for mutual respect because we cannot separate our sexuality from our personality, humanity or general interests and needs.

Reciprocal desire, in her opinion, means that both partners communicates complementary expectations and goals for her or his intimate interaction and satisfies their expectations and goals overall. Without desire, Estes argues it may result in sensual or emotional dissatisfaction and physical or psychological trauma. In addition, Estes states we must communicate with our partner to assure reciprocal consent, desire and concern. Communication may be direct, explicit and specific or indirect, implicit and vague.

The scenario above I believe does not fulfil all the appropriate criteria of reciprocal consent, concern and desire.

Reciprocal consent is described as both partners agreeing in the intimate activity. The scenario mentions that both A and B shared their interest in having sex with each other. Additionally, mentioning they will consider protective sex. This meets reciprocal consent but doesn’t satisfy the rest of the criteria. Reciprocal concern is defined as engaging into their partner’s personal, human and moral health. The scenario above doesn’t emphasize if they had a conversation about their health but does showcase A’s thoughts of being dumped by C. Then, it mentions how much A wants to be with C.

This leads to reciprocal desire because both partners communicate expectations and goals for their intimate interaction. Moreover, the scenario doesn’t refer what A and B would like to encounter but mentions how A thought about C during intercourse. This leads to A not making eye contact to the fit time. What they could have done otherwise, is communicate about their personal life, health and what they are expecting instead of feeling uncomfortable in the fit time. Emphasizing their interests and considerations beforehand, reveals their reciprocal concern for each other. Accentuating their desire allows your partner to recognize what they should do to satisfy your needs instead of feeling uneasy in the given moment. The issue of this scenario is communication wasn’t achieved, which made A feel awkward.

Casual sex, in Estes opinion, merely represents less traditional behaviors that can be morally acceptable but state moral issues. She says that between virtually absolute strangers, they seem to disregard the criteria of reciprocal consent and concern. The participants should insist upon very direct, explicit and clear communication. In casual sex with acquaintances, the participants need to emphasize direct, explicit and specific affirmation to meet your partner’s needs. She states there isn’t anything morally wrong with casual sex but, the participants must be responsible and honest enough to communicate and respond open-mindedly. I agree with Estes’s statement of strangers disregarding reciprocal consent and concern. Considering being absolute strangers, not knowing anything about them will cause me to feel uneasy even if I give consent.

I think casual sex merely fulfills the criteria of consent due to the fact of Estes stating it is an agreement of both participants to the activity. I also agree that participants should be direct, explicit and have clear communication because you wouldn’t want to do something out of the ordinary. I believe participants are trying to meet your partner’s needs. I agree upon the participants being responsible and honest with their partners because you don’t want anything crucial to happen to you. For instance, my perception is people are more prone to experiencing casual sex at parties because people don’t attend to acquire reciprocal consent, concern and desire. People attending parties typically enter with the mindset of having fun as well as being free.