To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Assessment is a term that encompasses various methods used to determine the extent of an individual's achievement. In educational settings, assessment refers to the methods employed to gauge the attainment of learning outcomes. Similarly, in professional contexts, assessment is concerned with evaluating professional standards and competence (Aranda & Yates, 2009). Assessment serves several critical purposes:
Assessment allows for the definition of achievement levels and measures students' preparedness for professional challenges. It provides a structured way to assign grades that reflect the quality of a student's work and understanding of a subject.
Assessment can be a powerful motivator for learning.
By creating opportunities that carry rewards such as grades or completion certificates, assessment encourages students to engage deeply with the material and strive for excellence.
Assessment activities play a pivotal role in guiding individuals through the learning process. They help students identify their strengths and weaknesses, allowing for targeted efforts to improve their understanding of subject matter.
Assessment offers opportunities for individuals to monitor the quality of their performance.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Education
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
Through feedback, students can pinpoint areas that require improvement, fostering a culture of continuous learning and growth.
It is essential to clarify the exact purpose of assessment to ensure its effectiveness. Assessments serve a range of distinct functions, including motivation, creating learning opportunities, providing feedback (to both students and staff), grading, and serving as a quality assurance mechanism for both internal and external systems (Oxford Brookes University, 2011).
While it is desirable for assessments to fulfill the first three functions as frequently as possible, the last two functions do not necessitate frequent execution but must be carried out at some point.
Consequently, assessments often try to fulfill all these functions to varying degrees without a clear understanding of their distinct purposes.
For example, an essay question that is double-marked, with the marks contributing to the students' final grades, can encompass all these functions. However, requiring every assessment to be equally rigorous would be impractical due to the substantial time and effort required. In contrast, a peer-assessed seminar presentation, not factored into final grades but serving as a course requirement, can effectively fulfill the first three functions without necessitating a tutor's constant presence.
Formative assessment stands in contrast to summative assessment. The former supports teachers and students in decision-making throughout the educational and learning processes, while the latter occurs at the end of a learning unit to determine knowledge retention (Wikipedia, 2013). Formative assessment is distinguished not by its format but by how the information derived from it is used. The same assessment can serve as either formative or summative, depending on its purpose.
Formative assessment revolves around shared learning goals between teachers and students. It facilitates alterations to the teaching and learning process as needed, making it an ongoing endeavor rather than an endpoint. Formative assessments prioritize assessing for learning, focusing on the process rather than the final result (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
Formative assessments concentrate on both the learning process and progress, unlike other assessments that primarily focus on outcomes. They monitor students' progress continuously, enabling adjustments to achieve learning objectives effectively.
Formative assessments are consistent and ongoing throughout the learning process. This ongoing nature allows teachers and students to adapt their strategies to ensure meaningful learning.
Formative assessments provide immediate feedback to both teachers and students due to their continuous assessment practices. This immediate feedback fosters motivation and supports ongoing learning.
Despite their numerous benefits, effective formative assessment can be challenging to implement at scale. Providing detailed descriptive feedback for each student in a large class may be logistically impossible. Even with fewer students, sustaining formative assessment requires significant time and effort from teachers, especially when combined with other summative assessments they must conduct.
The educational system's layered accountability structure, from students to teachers, schools, districts, and beyond, places pressure on objectively measuring student performance at each level. Formative assessment, however, does not easily provide this type of accountability. Consequently, empirical studies consistently show that very few teachers consistently employ formative assessment in practice.
Summative assessment measures overall attainment and records learning progress. Common forms of summative assessment include tests and examinations, though it is increasingly incorporating tasks completed during the school year, such as projects. This shift allows learners to demonstrate their abilities without the pressure of a single high-stakes examination, accommodating diverse learning styles and needs.
Summative assessments help determine the extent to which learners have achieved specific learning objectives. The validity and reliability of summative assessments are crucial, as they often have significant consequences for students' future prospects (Summative Assessment, 2005).
Validity pertains to whether the assessment tasks accurately measure their intended objectives. On the other hand, reliability considers whether the results would remain consistent if the same assessment were administered on another occasion, assuming no further learning occurred, and irrespective of the person who marked the assessment if multiple individuals were involved in the process.
The choice between norm-referenced and criterion-referenced summative assessment depends on the assessment's purpose. Norm-referencing is suitable when selecting the best candidates for continued education, while criterion-referencing is appropriate when assessing mastery of specific skills. For example, assessing airline pilots focuses on their ability to fly safely at a high level of proficiency, which requires criterion-referenced assessment since the goal is to determine whether candidates have reached the necessary standard for safe flight.
Summative assessments can generate anxiety among students, particularly as the significance of the assessment grows. Test preparation can lead to increased stress and anxiety, which can negatively impact student performance. In addition, some students may not perform well under examination pressure, leading to an assessment that does not accurately reflect their true capabilities.
Furthermore, summative assessments may have a detrimental impact on student self-esteem, as standardized tests can create feelings of inferiority among test-takers. Even students who perform adequately or well on such tests may experience a reduction in self-esteem due to the perceived failure to meet their own high expectations (Boggiano, 1992). Consequently, summative assessments can reduce students' motivation to engage actively in their education (Hammond).
In conclusion, a balanced assessment approach that incorporates both formative and summative assessments is ideal. A balanced assessment system employs various assessment methods for different purposes, promoting student involvement and ownership of learning. Formative assessment plays a crucial role in helping teachers and students assess the quality of ongoing learning and predict the results of summative tests well in advance.
Such formative results can serve as the basis for modifying the teaching and learning environment, ensuring that adjustments are made early enough to impact both immediate and future learning outcomes. Learning is a dynamic process that can be observed and evaluated as it unfolds, making formative evaluation an essential tool for enhancing teaching and learning before it's too late.
Summative assessment, on the other hand, provides a final measure of learners' achievement and their ability to meet specific learning objectives. The choice between formative and summative assessments depends on the educational context and objectives. While both forms have their limitations, a well-balanced approach that integrates them effectively can yield the best outcomes for students' learning and development.
Ultimately, the significance of assessment in education cannot be overstated. It guides the teaching and learning process, motivates students, provides valuable feedback, and ensures that educational standards are met. By understanding the distinct purposes and characteristics of formative and summative assessments, educators can create a more effective and meaningful learning experience for their students.
The Significance of Assessment in Education. (2016, May 08). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/forms-of-assessment-and-summative-assessment-in-education-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
