Developmental Stages of Children's Thinking

Understanding the cognitive development of children is crucial for educators and parents alike. Jean Piaget, a renowned Swiss psychologist, made significant contributions to our understanding of how children's thinking evolves during different stages of their development. In this essay, we will delve into two of Piaget's key stages: the pre-operational stage and the concrete operational stage, with a particular focus on children aged 6-7 years, commonly found in Year 2 of their education.

The Pre-Operational Stage

The pre-operational stage, which typically spans from ages 2 to 7 years, represents a critical period in a child's cognitive development.

During this stage, children are primarily engaged in thinking that is dominated by perception, although errors and misunderstandings may occur. One of the notable concepts in this stage, as articulated by Piaget, is the idea of conservation.

Conservation refers to a child's ability to understand that certain aspects of an object remain the same despite undergoing various changes. For example, a child in the pre-operational stage might struggle with the concept that the quantity of liquid in a tall, narrow glass is the same as that in a short, wide glass, even if the appearance differs.

Get quality help now
writer-Charlotte
writer-Charlotte
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Education

star star star star 4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

This limitation arises from a focus on perceptual features rather than abstract reasoning.

It is essential to recognize that children progress through these stages at their own pace, and not all will reach the concrete operational stage by age 7. However, understanding these stages provides educators with valuable insights into the developmental needs of their students.

The Concrete Operational Stage

The concrete operational stage typically encompasses children aged 7 to 11 years.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

During this stage, children's thinking becomes less reliant on perception and more oriented towards cognitive operations related to concrete situations. A key characteristic of this stage is the ability to engage in logical reasoning regarding direct and concrete situations.

In concrete operational thinking, children can perform mental operations in the presence of actual objects. They are capable of examining objects or manipulating materials to comprehend abstract concepts. For example, when presented with mathematical problems involving physical objects or materials, children in this stage can more readily grasp the underlying mathematical principles.

One effective educational tool that aligns with the concrete operational stage is the Logo program. Developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the late 1960s by Cynthia Solomon, Wallace Feurzeig, and Seymour Papert, Logo is a computer programming language designed to enhance children's understanding of mathematical concepts. A prominent feature of Logo is turtle graphics, which involves constructing designs or images through a drawing "turtle."

Roamer, a floor robot resembling a turtle, serves as a tangible representation of Logo's principles. It allows children to apply the same computer language to control the Roamer's movements physically. This hands-on approach facilitates the concrete operational thinking required for tasks like programming the Roamer to follow specific paths or patterns, thereby reinforcing mathematical and logical concepts.

Research Setting

The research for this study was conducted at an infant school in Teddington, which offers excellent facilities for early education. The school consists of three forms of infant classes, accommodating children from reception to Year 2, with approximately three classes per age group. Additionally, the school houses a nursery class, complete with its own playground, tailored to the needs of the youngest learners.

Notably, the school has a Special Needs unit within the main building, providing support for children with disabilities. Admission prioritizes local residents and siblings of current students. While the school shares playing fields with a junior school, it operates independently.

Project Setting

This study specifically focuses on Year 2 students with mixed attainment levels, ranging from those who cannot be leveled according to National Curriculum descriptors to those achieving a certain level. The research took place in the school's ICT suite within the main building, rather than the external hut. The ICT suite was equipped with tables and chairs, resembling a typical classroom environment.

The study involves Year 2 students, who are divided into two groups: an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group receives specific treatment designed to yield particular outcomes, while the control group either receives no special treatment or neutral treatment. The research primarily relies on qualitative data collection methods, allowing for the interpretation of attitudes, opinions, and values.

Implementation

Effective research methods are essential for gathering evidence and data. Primary data collection enables personal input and initiative, enhancing the project's authenticity. Given the limited time available for data collection, a case study approach was deemed appropriate for this research. The case study approach allows for an in-depth exploration of a small group of six children, each identified as Child 1 to Child 6.

Random selection ensured a cross-section of the class, promoting diversity in the study group. Within the study, the children were further divided into experimental and control groups. Random assignment reduced the risk of participants modifying their behavior if they became aware of being part of an experiment.

Qualitative data was collected through observations and audio recordings during lessons conducted with the children. The research involved a participatory observer role as well as a naturalistic observer role. As the children were not familiar with the Roamer resource, teacher guidance was initially required.

During the lessons, teacher interaction was necessary to introduce the children to Roamer and answer any questions. Over time, as the children gained familiarity and confidence, a more naturalistic observer role was adopted. The anonymity of the children involved was maintained throughout the study to ensure their safety and privacy.

At the study's commencement, detailed notes were taken on the children's behavior, interactions, and responses. However, it became apparent that written notes were insufficient for capturing the richness of the children's conversations. To address this, audio recordings were utilized to record their discussions and interactions during the lessons.

This approach allowed for the comprehensive transcription of children's statements, providing a more accurate and complete record of their responses. It also facilitated subsequent analysis and interpretation of the data collected.

It is crucial to emphasize that maintaining the anonymity of the children participating in the study was of paramount importance. The study's results should remain confidential, and any discussion of individual children's achievements should exclusively involve their parents.

Conclusion

Understanding the stages of cognitive development in children is essential for educators and researchers alike. Jean Piaget's pre-operational and concrete operational stages offer valuable insights into how children's thinking evolves. These stages are particularly relevant to children aged 6-7 years, typically found in Year 2 of their education.

Through the pre-operational stage, children grapple with perceptual dominance and may encounter challenges in grasping concepts such as conservation. In contrast, the concrete operational stage witnesses a shift toward logical reasoning in concrete situations. This shift enables children to engage in more abstract thinking and problem-solving.

Moreover, educational tools like the Logo program and the Roamer robot align with the concrete operational stage, providing hands-on experiences that reinforce mathematical and logical concepts. The research conducted in an infant school in Teddington aimed to explore the impact of these tools on Year 2 students with mixed attainment levels.

Updated: Oct 10, 2024
Cite this page

Developmental Stages of Children's Thinking. (2020, Jun 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/formal-operational-stage-4557-new-essay

Developmental Stages of Children's Thinking essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment