To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Scientific research involving human participants necessitates a robust ethical framework to ensure the protection of individuals and the integrity of the scientific process. The 2002 APA ethics code outlines five general principles aimed at guiding psychologists towards the highest ethical standards within their profession. These principles encompass beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, and integrity, justice, and respect for individuals' rights and dignity. The Belmont Report further identifies three fundamental ethical principles for research: respect for persons, justice, and beneficence. This essay delves into an extensive exploration of these principles, elucidating their significance and application in the realm of biomedical and behavioral research.
The principle of beneficence and nonmaleficence, rooted in the utilitarian tradition, mandates researchers to strive for the maximization of potential benefits while minimizing risks.
However, the practical implementation of this mandate is complex, as estimating costs to participants and benefits to society is challenging. Ethical decision-making in this context involves seeking advice, implementing safeguards, and ensuring informed consent.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Ethics
4.9 (247)
“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”
Additionally, researchers must consider the ethical implications when risks extend to groups or social institutions, addressing the issue of representative consent for collective entities.
Risks that are identified in advance must be communicated to prospective research participants or their legal equivalent, and informed consent must be obtained (except in special cases approved by the IRB, such as research involving a placebo control, in which fully informed consent compromises a scientifically required research design). Sometimes research presents risks to groups of people or social institutions.
No consensus exists for whether a representative can provide consent on behalf of a collective entity, but full compliance with Principle 1 requires sensitivity to this issue.
Principle 1: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence Representing the utilitarian tradition, this principle requires that researchers, using considerations such as those described above, strive to maximize potential benefits while minimizing risks of their research. Although the cost-benefit mandate seems straightforward, it is rarely unambiguous in practice because costs to participants and benefits to the profession and to society are difficult to accurately estimate in advance and no universally agreed-upon method or criteria exist for optimally balancing the two. Where questions arise related to the degree of risk, researchers are responsible for seeking ethical advice and implementing safeguards to protect participants.
Principle 2: Fidelity, Responsibility, and Trust This principle requires researchers to establish and maintain a relationship of trust with research participants. For example, before individuals agree to participate in research, investigators must be clear and explicit in describing to prospective participants what they will experience and what consequences may result from participation. Researchers also are obligated to honor all promises and commitments that are made as part of the agreement to participate. When full disclosure is not made prior to obtaining informed consent (e.g., information germane to the purpose of the study would compromise its validity), safeguards must be implemented to protect the welfare and dignity of participants.
In general, procedures that involve concealment or deception in a research design can be implemented only after rigorous criteria for the necessity of such procedures are met and the study is approved by the IRB. (Such instances also require a thorough debriefing of participants at the conclusion of their participation.) When children or adults with limited understanding serve as participants, researchers must implement special protective safeguards. When unintended negative consequences of research participation occur, researchers are obligated to detect, remove, and/or correct these consequences and ensure that they do not persist over time. Understandably, past ethical breaches have resulted in what some describe as widespread mistrust of biomedical and behavioral research in contemporary society. Principle 2 requires researchers to make every effort to foster trust and avoid causing further public mistrust.
Integrity, the third principle, underscores the importance of "doing good science" by truthfully reporting results, correcting errors, and avoiding piecemeal publication. Researchers are obligated to present their work truthfully, give appropriate credit, and respect the proprietary rights of others. Sharing data for verification purposes is encouraged, contributing to the advancement of scientific knowledge. Upholding integrity is integral to maintaining public trust and confidence in the scientific enterprise.
Principle 3: Integrity This principle requires researchers to "do good science," to truthfully report their results, to take reasonable steps to correct errors that are discovered, to present work that is their own (or to otherwise make appropriate citations), to take responsibility and credit only for work that is their own, to avoid "piecemeal publication" (i.e., submitting redundant analyses of a single data set for multiple publications), to share data on which results are published with other qualified professionals provided they seek only to verify substantive claims and do not use the data for any other purpose, and to respect the proprietary rights of others engaged in the scientific enterprise.
The principle of justice comprises distributive justice, entitling all individuals equal access to research benefits and ensuring that risks are not disproportionately greater for specific groups. Procedural justice, the second aspect, involves creating fair research procedures and accessible mechanisms for addressing participant concerns. Researchers contribute to justice by attending to the concerns of underrepresented groups, avoiding underinclusion, and fostering diverse representation in research programs.
Researchers also are promoting Principle 3 when they attend to the special concerns of underrepresented groups in developing programs of research, so as to avoid continued underinclusion and lack of representation in the knowledge base.
Representing the deontological tradition, this principle emphasizes the intrinsic worth of individuals and their autonomous choices. Respecting participants involves obtaining informed consent, avoiding coercion and deception, upholding confidentiality, and preserving participants' self-determination. Psychologists must be mindful of individual differences influenced by various factors, including gender, age, culture, race, and other characteristics. Adherence to this principle is crucial for maintaining ethical standards in research involving human participants.
Ethical Conflicts and Decision Making The potential for ethical conflict is ubiquitous in biomedical and behavioral research. When making ethical decisions about research, it may be prudent to develop a systematic approach to reviewing all relevant sources of ethical responsibility, including one's own moral principles and personal values; cultural factors; professional ethics codes, such as the APA code; agency or employer policies; federal and state rules and regulations; and even case law or legal precedent.
A process-oriented approach to ethical decision making may involve some variation of the following: (1) writing a description of the ethically relevant parameters of the situation; (2) defining the apparent dilemma; (3) progressing through the relevant sources of ethical responsibility; (4) generating alternative courses of action; (5) enumerating potential benefits and consequences of each alternative; (6) consulting with the IRB, relevant colleagues, and/or legal professionals; (7) documenting the previous six steps in the process; and (8) evaluating and taking responsibility for the results of the course of action selected. As previously mentioned, all research studies must be approved by the relevant IRB. However, approval of a research proposal by an IRB does not remove the mandate of ethical responsibility from the researcher. In making ethical decisions, researchers should consider the likelihood of self-serving bias that can lead to overestimation of the scientific value of a proposed study and underestimation of its risks.
In conclusion, conducting scientific research with human participants is a privilege that comes with significant responsibilities. Researchers must adhere to ethical principles outlined by professional organizations and governments, but strict rule application is not a substitute for well-reasoned, responsible decision-making. The complex nature of ethical considerations in biomedical and behavioral research necessitates continuous reflection, consultation, and a commitment to upholding the highest ethical standards. As we navigate the evolving landscape of research ethics, researchers play a crucial role in building and maintaining public trust in the pursuit of knowledge.
Expanding our understanding of these ethical principles requires delving into the nuanced applications and challenges researchers face. One aspect that merits attention is the evolving landscape of technology and its impact on research ethics. As technological advancements continue to shape the way research is conducted, researchers must grapple with new ethical considerations related to data privacy, consent in online research, and the responsible use of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.
Furthermore, the globalization of research introduces additional complexities. Researchers engaging in cross-cultural studies must navigate diverse ethical norms, ensuring that the principles of beneficence, justice, and respect for individuals' autonomy are applied appropriately across different cultural contexts. Striking a balance between cultural sensitivity and adherence to ethical standards becomes paramount in these situations.
Addressing these emerging challenges requires ongoing collaboration and dialogue among researchers, ethicists, and policymakers. It underscores the importance of continuous education and training in research ethics to equip researchers with the knowledge and skills needed to navigate complex ethical landscapes. Professional organizations, educational institutions, and funding agencies play a pivotal role in fostering a culture of ethical research by providing resources, guidelines, and support for researchers.
Ultimately, the ethical principles outlined in the APA code serve as a foundation for ethical conduct, but their practical application requires a nuanced understanding of the dynamic and multifaceted nature of research. As we strive to advance knowledge and address pressing societal challenges through research, upholding the highest ethical standards remains paramount. Researchers must not only be aware of ethical principles but also actively engage in ethical decision-making, recognizing the impact of their choices on individuals, communities, and the broader scientific community.
Ethical Principles in Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (2016, Jul 30). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/five-ethical-principles-for-research-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
