In its broadest sagacity, the word “intermediary” comprises any individual who brings other persons mutually. In corporate finance, a financial intermediary is an organization that performs as a middleman connecting savers and borrowers. Exclusively, these institutions accrue money from financier and lend it to borrowers. An individual with additional money could seek out borrowers single-handedly and bypass intermediaries altogether. By eliminating the middleman; the investor would most probably obtain a higher return. So why then, do a lot of savers and borrowers use intermediaries?
The functions of financial intermediaries give two significant advantages to depositors.
The primary benefit is that providing loan through an intermediary is frequently less risky than lending directly. The intermediary has the capability to branch out. Financial intermediaries create a substantial number of loans, and while a proportion of them will be unstable, the losses are principally balanced by the lucrative loans. As a result, the regular depositor could only unswervingly create a handful of loans and any unstable loans would considerably affect his individual wealth.
Intermediaries have the aptitude to put their “eggs” in several “baskets,” thus making certain minimum risk to its depositors. The second vital benefit financial intermediaries’ present is liquidity. Liquidity is the aptitude to rapidly turn an asset into cash. Real estate property is measured an illiquid asset; trading a home can obtain an immense deal of time. For instance, if a person loans money to another person, this loan can also be measured an illiquid asset. If the lender requests cash, gathering rapidly on the loan may be very complicated.
Even though an intermediary may create illiquid loans, its mass permits it to make cash obtainable to individual savers. Only when a great numeral of depositors desire to take out money at the same time, is an intermediary not capable to give liquidity to its investors. Fortunately, this is an uncommon incidence by present day industry standards. (Grimwade, 2000) All through the securities trading procedure, the broker plays the role of an intermediary between investor and the trading system. A broker’s roles include offering speculation recommendation, stock suggestions, market information, and caution indications.
The broker sends out investors’ orders to the trading system, substantiates the end result of the implementation, and care for investor’s account, levy, and substances relating to securities rules and conventions. The concluding decision, though, is made by investor. And its results are, certainly, investor’s. The broker is not answerable for the proceeds one put together or the losses one acquires. It is normally supposed that the broker functions simply as a middleman in securities transactions, with commissions as the arrival.
Actually, conversely, for this commission, the broker has to be accountable to their customers for correctness, beginning from starting the trading account in anticipation of carrying out clearing and resolution. Their errands comprise: a) Implementing and performing securities transaction resourcefully, as per customer’s instructions. b) Providing the securities imbursement to the seller and transitory the scrip to the purchaser timely. c) Giving the securities depository services and making certain that the consumer’s securities trading account is at all times accurate. (Board, 2002)
The role of a broker is not entirely changed since the inception of on-line investing. There are certain impacts on the role of a broker due to online investing like now the broker has to provide more amount of information in smaller span of time to its clients.