To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In Henrik Ibsen's renowned 1879 play, "A Doll's House," the character Nils Krogstad emerges as a dynamic force, instigating drama and tension that reverberates throughout the narrative. This essay delves into Krogstad's complex character, dissecting his tumultuous relationship with society and how his actions reshape the lives of those in his orbit, particularly Nora.
The exploration of Krogstad's character commences with a scrutiny of his murky past, a narrative constructed through the lens of snide comments from fellow characters.
Act I and Act II witness various characters casting aspersions on Krogstad, portraying the pervasive judgmental atmosphere that envelops him.
Dr. Rank, in an act of distant judgment, labels Krogstad as "morally diseased," setting the tone for societal perception. Helmer, Nora's husband, magnifies Krogstad's transgressions, referring to them not as indiscretions but as a "horrible corruption" that poisons the atmosphere of Krogstad's home.
Even Christine, who harbors affection for Krogstad, remarks on the evident change in him since their last meeting.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Conversation
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
These collective comments construct a vivid portrayal of a man burdened by the weight of his past misdeeds. Krogstad, metaphorically noted by Dr. Rank, harbors a desire not only to physically exist but to reclaim his place in a society that currently stigmatizes him.
Krogstad himself directly acknowledges his transgressions only once, confiding in Nora about their shared guilt in forgery. Interestingly, despite their common guilt, Krogstad and Nora face disparate treatments, highlighting a pivotal theme: it is not the act itself that creates strife, but the reactions of those who learn about it.
Intriguingly, Krogstad describes his employment at the bank, an act he frames as an act of charity.
This sheds light on the challenges he must have faced prior to securing this position, hinting at the difficult journey that predates his initial appearance in the play.
Act I unfurls a somber characterization of Krogstad before his physical introduction, setting the stage for an intricate exploration of a character grappling with societal judgments that transcend his own actions.
Krogstad's initial presence in the play is marked by an unpleasant encounter, particularly with Nora. Early on, a cold and seemingly cruel conversation unfolds between them, leaving a palpable tension. Nora, standing at the door after Krogstad's interaction with Helmer, must reassure her children that the enigmatic man poses no threat.
This visible wickedness that accompanies Krogstad is so profound that even the innocence of children can sense it, portraying him as a figure tainted by society's faultfinding tendencies. His return to criminal behavior, resorting to blackmail to secure his job, underscores the societal pressures that compel him to maintain an illicit hold over Nora.
Within the complex web of Krogstad's motivations lies a compelling desire for redemption and societal acceptance, especially for the sake of his family. His acknowledgment that his sons are growing, coupled with his reluctance to subject them to the repercussions of his past mistakes, paints a poignant picture of a man yearning for a semblance of respectability.
Krogstad, intriguingly, doesn't harbor an explicit intention to harm Nora. Rather, his focus is on ensuring his family's acceptance in society, a goal that, for him, supersedes any inclination to aid Nora or her husband. The bond he creates becomes a tool, allowing him to exert power in a seemingly insurmountable situation.
Ironically, Krogstad, in his pursuit of legitimacy, resorts to crude and criminal methods, highlighting the paradoxical nature of his struggle to rise above his past. His encounter with Mrs. Linde, a potential replacement at the bank, propels him to drastic measures to coerce Nora into assisting him, showcasing the lengths he's willing to go to overcome societal barriers.
The societal lens, deeply concerned with appearances, casts a long shadow on Krogstad's opportunities. Childhood friend Torvald exemplifies this, distancing himself to maintain an illusion of respectability, citing Krogstad's perceived familiarity as the primary reason for dismissal.
Despite Krogstad's earnest efforts at the bank and attempts at self-improvement, societal judgment remains a formidable obstacle. In Act I, Krogstad articulates his preparedness to fight for his position at the bank, equating it to a battle for his life, symbolizing the honest and acceptable life he aspires to carve out for himself—a small step away from the shadows of his former crime.
A transformative juncture in Krogstad's narrative materializes with the introduction of Mrs. Linde, who, intimately acquainted with societal judgment as a working woman of the time, extends an unexpected lifeline to Krogstad. In Act III, she proposes marriage, fully cognizant of the stigma encircling him.
Christine Linde's acceptance fulfills Krogstad's profound need for support and encouragement from society, effectively undermining his extreme efforts to maintain his position at the bank. The "happy change" he envisions in his note can be unequivocally attributed to the two individuals finding solace and acceptance in each other, transcending societal expectations.
With Christine's acceptance, Krogstad undergoes a significant transformation, allowing him to relinquish the bond and abandon his blackmail attempt. This turning point marks a departure from his criminal past and signifies a return to a legitimate life, illustrating the power of societal acceptance in shaping individual destinies.
In conclusion, Nils Krogstad emerges as a character profoundly disadvantaged by the weight of his own reputation in Ibsen's "A Doll's House." His past transgressions continue to exert a detrimental influence on his present, and his resort to illegal means reflects a society that inadvertently compels him back into the mold they have crafted for him.
It is only through the lens of acceptance, embodied by Christine Linde, that Krogstad finds the strength to put his immoral activities behind him. His journey mirrors that of Nora, both victims of the stringent and unforgiving norms of Nineteenth Century society. Krogstad's redemption becomes a testament to the transformative power of acceptance, transcending societal judgments and allowing individuals to reclaim their agency in crafting their destinies.
Krogstad's Redemption: Societal Stigma and Acceptance. (2020, Jun 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/during-her-conversation-with-krogstad-what-last-resort-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
