To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Attachment theory has been a central focus in developmental psychology, with scholars like Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth contributing significantly to our understanding of how attachment manifests in individuals. While their methodologies differ, both researchers conducted studies to investigate the dynamics of attachment. In this essay, we delve into the unique approaches of Harlow and Ainsworth, exploring the ethical implications of their experiments and the lasting impact on our understanding of human development.
Harry Harlow, known for his groundbreaking work on attachment in the mid-20th century, conducted extensive experiments using monkeys in a laboratory setting.
Harlow's central premise was that attachment formed to objects providing comfort. His experiments involved removing monkeys from their natural habitats and exposing them to conditions that are now considered unethical and cruel.
Harlow's subjects found solace in unexpected items, such as sanitary pads or terry-cloth mothers. The drastic removal from their natural environment, however, raised ethical concerns. Monkeys were subjected to living conditions dictated solely by Harlow, a practice that would be deemed unacceptable by contemporary standards.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Compare And Contrast
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
Notably, Harlow introduced the "iron maiden" mother, an abusive parent figure that subjected infant monkeys to pressurized cold air, an action unthinkable and in violation of ethical standards today.
It is crucial to acknowledge that Harlow's experiments, while instrumental in shaping attachment theory, would not pass contemporary ethical scrutiny. Changes in experimental protocols, particularly regarding animal welfare, have evolved since Harlow's time.
In contrast to Harlow's laboratory experiments, Mary Ainsworth conducted her influential "Strange Situation" study in a more naturalistic setting.
Observing children and their mothers in a room, Ainsworth explored how children reacted to the absence and return of their mothers. Unlike Harlow's experiments, the children in Ainsworth's study were never completely separated from their mothers; the mothers were either present or just outside the room, ensuring a secure environment.
Ainsworth's focus was not on "contact comfort" but rather on understanding how children responded to their mothers' departures and returns. If a child displayed distress, the parent intervened, ensuring the child's well-being. This stands in stark contrast to Harlow's use of the iron maiden, as Ainsworth's study prioritized ethical considerations and the emotional welfare of the children involved.
While Ainsworth's work may seem stringent in some instances, it pales in comparison to the lasting negative effects observed in Harlow's isolated monkeys. The monkeys raised in isolation exhibited severe social disturbances in adulthood, with females becoming neglectful mothers themselves. This stark contrast underscores the ethical implications of Harlow's experiments and the potential long-term harm inflicted upon his subjects.
In retrospect, Ainsworth's brief separations had no discernible impact on the children's well-being in the long term. The temporary distress experienced during the study did not translate into lasting effects, highlighting the ethical and methodological distinctions between Ainsworth and Harlow's approaches.
In conclusion, the works of Harry Harlow and Mary Ainsworth significantly contributed to our understanding of attachment, albeit through divergent methodologies. Harlow's lab-based experiments, while groundbreaking, faced ethical criticisms for their treatment of monkeys. Ainsworth's naturalistic approach, emphasizing ethical considerations, provided valuable insights without causing lasting harm to the subjects.
As we reflect on these studies, it becomes evident that the field of attachment research has evolved, incorporating ethical considerations and shaping modern experimental protocols. Harlow's experiments, while influential, serve as a reminder of the ethical responsibilities inherent in psychological research, prompting ongoing discussions on the welfare of subjects and the pursuit of knowledge.
Understanding Attachment: A Comparative Analysis of Harlow and Ainsworth. (2016, Sep 11). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/compare-and-contrast-harlow-and-ainsworth-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
