Crisis in India: Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and Global Business Ethics

Abstract

The ethical crisis faced by multinational giants Coca-Cola and Pepsi in India unfolds a complex narrative involving consumer health, environmental cleanliness, and corporate responsibility. This paper navigates through the intricacies of issue management, crisis management, global business ethics, stakeholder management, and corporate social responsibility. It further explores the lessons this case imparts to other global entities.

Introduction

The predicament for Coke and Pepsi began when their products faced scrutiny from the Center of Science and Environment (CSE) in India. Allegations of hazardously high pesticide residues triggered concerns about potential health risks.

Sunita Narain, the director of CSE, contended that prolonged consumption of these products could lead to cancer, birth defects, and harm the human nervous and immune systems. Additionally, India Resource Center (IRC) accused these beverage giants, especially Coca-Cola, of polluting sacred water sources in India, further aggravating the ethical crisis.

The cultural significance of water in India escalated the issue, as it holds spiritual importance and is considered sacred.

Get quality help now

Sweet V

Verified writer

Proficient in: Medha Patkar

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Accusations of water pollution were seen as a disrespect to Indian culture, resulting in a severe decline in sales for both Coke and Pepsi over several years.

Issue Management

According to Buchholtz and Carroll's "Business and Society" (7th edition), the issue management process involves identifying, analyzing, ranking, formulating a response, implementing the response, and evaluating results. In analyzing an issue, a company gains a deeper understanding, allowing for prioritization based on strategic, relevance, actionability, criticality, and urgency criteria.

Coca-Cola's response to the crisis was questionable. In an attempt to distract the public, Coke conducted its own tests, asserting the safety of their products.

However, the company's strategy seemed to deflect blame by suggesting that pesticide levels were pervasive in all Indian food products. This raised ethical concerns, as Coke appeared to prioritize profits over the safety and health rights of consumers.

Following issue analysis, companies formulate strategies to address the problem. In Coke's case, their response was flawed. Rather than apologizing for environmental damage, they hired a new public relations firm to refurbish their image. This move indicated a prioritization of profits over the acknowledgment of wrongdoing.

Moreover, Coke's self-conducted studies contradicted CSE and IRC results, portraying an attempt to mislead consumers. Such unethical practices infringe on consumers' rights to be informed about both the benefits and dangers of a product.

Coca-Cola demonstrated poor issue management initially, only intensifying the situation into a full-blown crisis. The company's actions of environmental pollution without acknowledgment and attempts to manipulate public perception through strategic image building raise serious ethical concerns.

Crisis Management

While issue management focuses on preventing problems from escalating, crisis management deals with the aftermath of a full-blown crisis. In the case of Coke and Pepsi in India, the crisis reached a point where the Supreme Court ordered both companies to label their products with warnings, affirming consumers' rights to be informed about the product contents.

Crisis management involves a series of steps, starting with a well-formulated response to the crisis. For Coke, the crisis did not conclude with the Supreme Court order, as environmental pollution concerns persisted. Instead of issuing an apology, Coke hired a new public relations firm, indicating a preference for image enhancement over addressing their environmental transgressions.

This lack of genuine crisis management leaves the ethical concerns unresolved. Ineffective crisis management not only damages a company's reputation but also underscores their unwillingness to take responsibility for their actions.

Global Business Ethics and Stakeholder Management

Global business ethics entail conducting business in a manner that respects diverse cultural values and norms. The Coca-Cola and Pepsi crisis in India highlights the importance of cultural sensitivity, particularly regarding water, which holds spiritual significance in Indian culture.

Stakeholder management involves recognizing and addressing the concerns of various stakeholders. In this case, stakeholders include consumers, environmentalists, and the Indian public. Coke's actions reflected a disregard for both environmental and cultural stakeholders, leading to a significant decline in sales and tarnished reputations for both companies.

Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) encompasses a company's commitment to ethical practices, environmental sustainability, and social well-being. In the case of Coke and Pepsi, accusations of environmental pollution and water exploitation challenged their commitment to CSR. Instead of addressing these concerns, Coke opted for image-building strategies, undermining the essence of corporate responsibility.

A truly responsible corporate entity would acknowledge its faults, work towards rectification, and actively contribute to environmental preservation. The actions of Coke and Pepsi in India raise questions about their genuine commitment to CSR and ethical business practices.

Lessons for Multinational Companies

The Coca-Cola and Pepsi crisis in India serves as a cautionary tale for multinational companies. It underscores the importance of proactive issue management, transparent crisis management, adherence to global business ethics, and sincere corporate social responsibility.

Companies must prioritize ethical conduct over short-term profits, acknowledge their mistakes, and actively engage with stakeholders to rebuild trust. The failure of Coke and Pepsi to navigate this crisis ethically provides valuable lessons for other global entities to be vigilant and socially responsible in their business practices.