1.0OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
Overall, this case illustrates how the former Burberry Chief Executive Director (CEO), Rose Marie Bravo who stepped in as CEO in 1997, has succeeded in revitalising and revamping the company to become more successful in term of profitability and marketability. This case was took place in year 2003 whereby Ms. Bravo had successfully turned around a fading company to a rejuvenated highly profitable company and had gained their competitive advantage in luxury brand after facing disastrous situation for almost two decades (from 1970’s to 1998).
She had led the brand to mass market success through marketing mix strategies by developing product diversification, adopting new promotional campaign and expanding new distribution network. Despite this success, Ms. Bravo however concerned how to keep the track record while maintaining the prestige and exclusivity of the brand. She also concerned about how they should strategize their marketing effort as well as overall business management to meet new changing and more challenging business environment and market demand in order to grow, survive and sustain in the marketplace.
2.0 BURBERRY’S SNAPSHOTS
Burberry, an iconic and authentic British luxury brand in fashion industry, was synonym with high-quality and durability product. It was founded by Thomas Burberry, a young dressmaker in 1856 in Basingstoke, Hampshire, England. Burberry initially operated in the very niche market whereby he was produced men’s outerwear such as raincoat and boot to cater for travellers and sportsmen needs by using a high-quality garment and serve the purpose as weatherproof and comfortable. In 1901, the “Equestrian Knight” trademark has been registered using the word “Prorsum” which means “move forwards”. This reflects their vision to venture into the global market.
It was proven by the establishment of the first foreign outlet in Paris in 1910, followed by South America, the United States and then Japan in 1915 by signing wholesale agreement as their retailer. Then, in 1920, the iconic ‘check’ pattern has been developed as a lining for Burberry’s product which conveys the recognizable brand image.
In the early years, Burberry has been regarded as prestigious and distinctive product due to their niche market which targeted upper-class people such as royal family, celebrities and politicians. Burberry gained the popularity further to the First World War when the Burberry coat (after that it was called as trench coat) had been using by British military.
Burberry was taken over by Great Universal Stores (GUS) a strong British conglomerate, in 1955 to expand their business more globally. Since then, Burberry extensively established foreign outlets network in the United States of America, European countries and Japan through licensing agreement. However, in 1970s their image and reputation has been tarnished with the British casual cult and football hooliganism. Further to this negative connotation and then collapse of Japan economy in the mid-1990s, had dragged Burberry into a catastrophic situation. The sales were declining and the brand slowly disappeared from customer’s mind whereby they lost their brand image and reputation.
So then, Burberry’s management hired Ms. Bravo as a new CEO and new management team in 1997 to revamp the brand as well as expanding it. The brand then has been repositioned as “accessible luxury” with the objective to be as functional yet aspirational brand.
2.2 Product Range
Burberry products are ranged in menswear, womenswear, childrens wear and non-apparel product such as leather bag, cosmetics and timepiece, While for its clothing product, there are three categories, which are Burberry Prorsum, Burberry London, and Burberry Brit. Each category is having their very own marketing strategies. Each of brand categories competes with its very own global competitors that have shown the similarities of key features between these two brands. Burberry Prorsum focuses on those who value being fashion forward and the collection is rarely seen on a street, but is meant for a runway. Prorsum price range is the highest among the three Burberry brands that cost up to £7,000. Prada made the closest competitor to Burberry Prorsum as they position their brand as modern, sophisticated, stylistic and craftsmanship of the highest quality. Whilst, Prorsum positioned itself as a premium collection, Burberry London is something like bridge line between Prorsum and Brit. The price and quality are between Prorsum and Brit. The collection is meant for easy to work that is suitable to be worn at work and fitting the body tight. The closest competitor for this type of product category is Giorgio Armani that carries the same brand positioning as Burberry London.
The casual wear range is named as Burberry Brit that competing closely with Polo Ralph Lauren which targeting younger customer and offer accessible and affordable pricing. Despite the point of parity that Burberry product has shown with its Global competitors, it shows point of difference, which cannot be copied by others and has its own competitive advantage where it portrays a heritage british luxury brand and it is the only one that has iconic checked pattern that shows its exclusivity. Table below shows the details of every category :
BrandsPrice RangeKey FeaturesMarketing StrategiesClosest Global CompetitorsPoint of ParityPoint of Difference Burberry ProrsumUp to £7000High-end couture & Runway fashionExclusive distribution by putting in the best stores & Prestige pricingPradaHand-tailored & haute coutureIconic checked pattern & Heritage British Luxury Brand Burberry London£200 – £3000Easy to wear styles. (smart office wear & leatherwear)Limited distribution & Premium PricingGiorgio ArmaniStylish and Poised Burberry Brit£100 – £2000Casual WearWide distribution and accessible pricingPolo Ralph LaurenTarget younger customer, Iconic Polo Tees Table 1 : Details of Burberry Clothing Categories
3.0 REVITALISATION STRATEGIES
Over the last decade, Burberry was well-known as a classic luxury brand focusing on outerwear attire. But in more recent times, Burberry has been recognized as very classic, chic and high-end lifestyle brand. By 2003, Burberry brand has gained popularity among urban young customer and hip hop musicians as they entered as in the list of Burberry customer base. This proved that Bravo and her team has achieved in turning around the luxury brand. Famous celebrities such as Madonna and her daughter have been seen wearing Burberry brand during those days. Burberry had won recognition and awards for Contemporary Design Collection of the Year from British fashion Council and Classic Design Collection of the year. The Burberry brand is known for it classic luxury brand with British legacy embedded in to it. In the year 2002, Bravo had gained reputation among one of the top executives and won in two successive years as CEO of the year. She’s been at the top listed in the Wall Street Journal Europe in women business awards. For her contribution to the fashion industry the Council of Fashion Designers of America has honored her in 2003. For the next five years, Bravo and her team are looking at the future of Burberry and she emphasize in bringing the brand to the next level. She’s still believe the brand has not reach to its full ability and a lot refining need to make before gaining to its maximum level. The following is the strategy that she and her team will be focus on.
3.1 Product Categories
Bravo and her team are updating the product line through redesigning of all Burberry products. During those years, some outdated products were removed and new look across all Burberry products. In 2003, new product line such as bandanas, miniskirts and boots were launched. The Burberry products can be categorized in to continuity or fashion oriented. Classic trench, duffle coats, handbags and scarves are all falls under continuity whereas fashion oriented are designed to response to current trends. Burberry collections are range from women swear, menswear and accessories. Bravo and her team were also taking control over the design, sourcing, manufacturing and distribution of non-licensed Burberry product. The management was looking on licensing arrangement either making new agreements or closes the old one to reduce inconsistencies in price, design and quality.
The expansion of the Burberry portfolio product for high profile and high end are labeled as Prorsum. This high end product has a limited distribution that only appears in the show run or runways. Towards the following year to come, the team needs to come out with new product line as part of the Burberry product extension. The targeted new product line is introducing children wear and product expansion in footwear and in Thomas Burberry. These are part of their main strategic plans for expansion. For instance in autumn 2003, they launched a new perfume line (Burberry Brit) in which the design of bottle features the brand check. This perfume exemplified charisma of English woman in thirties. They are hoping this new perfume will have a great lasting impact as Chanel no.5. With the new range of product line as in children wear or new perfume line will increase the product category and these products will open up new consumer market and increase the customer base of Burberry brand. This will tend to increase sales and profitability.
3.2 Popularity of the brand among non-target consumers
The main target customer is someone who wants luxury and for functional purposes. Burberry targeted the niche market in between labels of Polo Ralph Lauren and Giorgio Armani and between Coach and Gucci. They targeted younger consumers in expanding the market and maintain the loyal base. Since then, Burberry brand start to gain popularity among non-target consumers such as urban young consumers and hip hop musicians. A TV reality star of Big brother constantly won the Burberry brand. Even though all these shows optimistic signs that the brand aspire the youth but there a bit worried that this would push away their main core customers. With being popular to non-target consumers eventually will affect the Burberry brand positively and negatively. Their brand is become popular among the hip-hop musician and urban youth is positively shows their campaign is working and success. Burberry as an accessible luxury in attracting non-target consumers had a negative effect that will bring different image to Burberry itself and will probably lose their main core customers.
3.3 The Role of the Check
The Burberry check have been in appeared in all their luxury products from apparels to accessories. About 10% apparel that being sales featured the check, 10% in seasonal color variation, 40% of the check faintly use as a lining or piping and the rest of it will be without the brand check. As for the accessories nearly 60% to 70% of the sales were with check. Nearly 25% of the revenue derived from prominent check products. With the check, people would recognize immediately it’s Burberry brand. Hence, Bravo would like to pervasive the check in a strategic manner. So during this transition period, Bravo would like to minimize the use of the brand check in the next few years. She has confidence that the Burberry would be able to sell more without the check at all.
Her philosophy is to “check under cover”, her way of promoting the brand so customers will hunt or look for the pattern either inside or outside a coat. She’s also aware that on some customers who bought Burberry just because of the check. So the check management is important to Burberry. Basically the check reflects the history of the Burberry product. The check is recognized by all demographics where it’s contributed to high sales. The limitation on the usage should be at minimal as to preserve the brand image as Burberry know as prestigious product like Louis Vuitton, Chanel or Coach.
3.4 Sustainability of the Brand Positioning
In promoting the new Burberry brand image, Bravo hired a famed team who had experienced and appeared in Vogue, the Face and Vanity Fair. The first advertisement introduced a British model, Stella Tenant and in 1999 a model named Kate Moss joined in for advertising campaign. Bravo succeeds in positioning the luxury brand in between Ralph Lauren and Gucci. She accomplished in fixing the Burberry brand to be healthier than it’s never been in the last five years. She’s now looking at how they can sustain the Burberry positioning in the long run between lifestyle and fashion. She realized the stiff competition for Burberry would have in the next few years to come. Everyone is competitor in the industry and everywhere people with high income will shop at discount warehouse or middle-income customer will shop at luxury retailers.
Bravo recognized the next five years ahead would be even more difficult. The main task for her is to manage the popularity of the Burberry brand in a way that lays foundation for long run growth without become the victims of their own success. Burberry already succeeds in positioning itself between luxury brands and by expanding their current product categories to new product line of handbags or new perfume line for women or men to increase the market share. Burberry positioning as a functional luxury is quite competitive and will able to sustain in the long run.
4.0 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
Analysing the SWOT of Burberry as depicted in Table 2, we can conclude that they are in position to capture demand from emerging markets as they have a wide geographical presence. They have also a strong managing team which lead the marketing and designing team to maintain the consistency of its brand. Below are the details of the analysis: ItemDescription
•Huge retail network, wholesale and licensing channel globally
•Has a distinctive British heritage and one of the biggest fashion houses in UK
•Granted Royal Warrants by Queen Elizabeth II and the Prince of Wales
•One of the most valuable companies in the world due to its legacy Weakness
•Very much accessible in the high-street, and has a low couture presence due to Burberry’s positioning
•The brand can diversify into youth everyday fashion as currently the apparels have too much of English appeal Opportunity
•Global expansion would help the brand grow worldwide
•More advertising and marketing would increase visibility Threat
•High competition in same target segment like Gucci and Prada
•Threat from other competitive everyday brands in terms of pricing as well as availability
•The customers have higher bargaining power and low switching costs Table 2 : Burberry’s SWOT Analysis
In order to determine the long run profitability of Burberry market segment, we use the Porter 5-Forces Analysis. The details are as follows:
a)Bargaining Power Of Customers
Burberry has a unique customer segment, starting when waterproof and breathable gabardine fabric using by Thomas Burberry had created the customer base of people who went out in extreme condition. Later when Burberry introduced its check pattern in 1920’s and 1930’s, it became the signature trademark thus capturing other customer base such as politicians, celebrities and famous adventurers. Throughout this time the brand always stuck to the niche customers that they got the brand image of being conservative and sturdy with the old customer base. This caused their customers to find other brands that can suit their fashion desires. Only when brand loyalty exists and the customers wanted to buy undifferentiated product, it is more likely to be to the designer than the retailer. The position of retailers is at the end of the value chain, means that they cannot integrate forwards and are obliged to offer customers what they want. This strengthens customer power.
b)Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
Burberrys raw material procurement is from relatively reputed wholesalers, leather, fur, Uzbek cotton and Sandblasting. The bargaining power is mainly with the suppliers of leather and fur raw materials. With increase in demands of those materials, mostly all brands produce their goods using these materials and hence the suppliers being few have maximum bargaining power. Burberry imports raw material from the best suppliers because they do not compromise on quality. Suppliers with the best quality raw materials are few in number.
Burberry has 3 primary collections being womenswear, menswear and accessories. Its main competitors include Gucci, Prada and Coach. Coach primary positioning is on handbags along with watches and shoes to scarves and dog collars. Coach is primarily in the accessory end of fashion and which is priced low, affordable, and accessible to the general population. Other competitors being Gucci and Armani priced almost the same as Burberry but held a higher position than Burberry in the luxury brand section. To cope with these competitors, Burberry has adopted a term called continuous fashion. To respond to the day by day fashion trends Burberry introduces its products on a collection by collection basis. They have tried to maintain their collection and also kept in mind the competitor’s collection, while brands like Coach and Gucci have more focus on accessories and Armani focus on the apparel. Burberry has succeeded in handling both markets while remaining a luxury good. By having different product lines within the brand, it allows Burberry to offer higher end products and products which are feasible to be purchased by the general population.
d)Threat Of New Entrants
Burberry being a well-established luxury brand is a fashion icon since so many years. It was positioned as functional luxury in the minds of consumers. The segments and the type of consumers which follow the brand are loyal. Burberry has set a position in the market, which the new entrants are not a major threat to Burberry due to its strong distribution network and international supply chain. It has tied up its customers because of its authentic British heritage and unique positioning within the luxury area, which any new entrant will not have any impact on the Burberry sales.
e)Threat Of Substitution Products
Business environment in the fashion industry is highly competitive and trends are ever changing. In addition, luxury brand purchases represent a discretionary spending thus there is always a risk that consumers may find other competitors’ products which offer the same function are cheaper and more attractive. The threat may also come from extensive copying of Burberry product design. Some of the imitations were really similar to the genuine product that people may not be able to differentiate the difference.
In terms of brand positioning of its product mix, Burberry has placed itself in between brands such as Polo Ralph Lauren and Armani Exchange in apparel as well as in between Coach and Gucci in accessories. The varieties of its product lines that appeal from hipster to the conservative 60 year old man has positioned its brand in the mind of consumers to be a functional luxury which satisfy different segments of population. Coach, is an American luxury goods focuses more on the low end cost of accessories and more accessible to the general population. Whereas, Gucci that is an Italian fashion positioning its brand as luxury accessories and maintain a premium pricing. Polo Ralph Lauren and Giorgio Armani are among Top 10 Luxury Brand, which their marketing positioning is centered more towards apparel. Polo offers a lower price than Burberry on the same Polo Tee and office wear. Giorgio Armani is still maintaining its luxury position in the market that offers premium price of compared to Burberry.
The ability of Burberry to produce variety of product mix with two main categories, which are fashion and continuity and its ability to position itself in the middle of top luxury goods makes Burberry sustainable and competitive over long term. Table below illustrates the brand snapshots of selected Burberry competitors : CompetitorsPrimary ProductOriginated fromMarketing StrategiesBrand Positioning CoachAccessoriesUnited StatesLow end cost for accessories,More accessible & affordable GucciAccessoriesItalyLuxury Accessories & High pricedHighest priced brand for accessories Polo Ralph LaurenApparelUnited StatesLow pricedGreat brand equity and very well established among consumers Giorgio ArmaniApparelItalyHigh pricedMaintain strong luxury brand Table 3 : Snapshot of Burberry Competitors
What Brings Success to Louis Vuitton?
Burberry and LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton are among top 10 global luxury goods players and striving to gain market shares through their own marketing strategy that they believed would boost higher revenue and customer loyalty. Who does not know Burberry and Louis Vuitton that offer exclusivity and prestigious product that bring customer to a different level of personalized experience? However, Louis Vuitton has been sustaining its brand as the world’s leading luxury product group, with recorded revenue of $22.8 billion in 2013, an decrease of 19% compared to 2012. Whilst Louis Vuitton has increased tremendously in revenue gain, Burberry was recorded an increased in their revenue by 3% to $4.2 billion, compared to $4.07 billion in 2011. These two brands show excellent momentum in Europe, Asia and United States. Despite of higher growth acquired by Burberry, it still losses to LVMH group in terms of market shares where LVMH has placed themself as the top player among all luxury goods players. What makes LVMH is the best compared to any other brand?
The reason is its global appeal; exclusiveness, secretiveness and strong price premium make it, by far, the biggest name in luxury. Even Hermes, which portray their brand as small, private and extremely high end has lost to LVMH in market shares due to LVMH’s ability to sell in the billions but present oneself as making each product with singular devotion and exclusivity. Left alone Burberry which now suffering from too much of ubiquity, the new ‘buzzword’ for luxury, has deprived its demand by existing Burberry lover. The needs for Burberry to grow its wing into China market issued a profit warning in September 2013 as it shows a conflict perceptions among those consumers of what constitutes luxury.
LVMH is in the effort of maintaining its exclusivity and to curb the ubiquity by slowing down Chinese expansion by making their existing stores even more luxurious with VIP rooms and personalization to put a strong defend on its unique pieces, and not just their logo. All its businesses demonstrated excellent momentum driven by innovation and the quality of their products to suit its customer evolving preference and expectations. LVMH has undergone a few promotion strategies since its introductory phase and was very careful with mass advertising to maintain its exclusivity. Below are among of the promotion principles that have been practicing by Louis Vuitton that enable them to attain the success ever since its establishment.
Promotional strategies that contribute to its competitive advantage are:
Promotion 1: Principle Prohibiting Television Commercials
LV is avoiding the television commercials as a means of advertising media. LV has chosen “richness” instead of “reach” to attract and retain customer loyalty.
Promotion 2: Principle of Emphasis on Publicity
LV emphasizes publicity more towards public relation through mass media, such as magazines and newspapers more than average brands does. For instance, magnificent opening parties of LV’s large-scale stores are reported extensively in the fashion magazines.
Promotion 3: Principle of Brand Muse
LV has emphasized a few of celebrities who have taken a liking to and use a brand or epitomize the brand to act as one of the promotional channel and show the exclusivity of the brand. The old time celebrities that are normally related to LV brand are Audrey Hepburn, Alain Delon and Sharon
Stone. LV has never faded in style. LV and celebrities go hand in hand. The famed fashion label had a past collaboration with rapper Kanye West, and stars such as Madonna have previously posed for their campaign.
Promotion 4: Principle of Having Customers Lined up at Stores
Most of LV customers are frequently seen lining up at the LV store waiting for their turn to be allowed entering into the stores. We are more impressed of this view rather than it is looked as pitiful. LV is creating an excitement for the customer who will be seen impatiently lining up and waiting to enter the store.
Promotion 5: Principle of the Excuse of Supply Shortages
LV does not mass produced and have very limited number of product for certain collection. This is to stir up a sense of hunger in the customers’ mind and serves as excellent PR and to avoid ubiquity that is now facing by Burberry.
Signature ProductTrench CoatLeather Goods
Promotional Strategies1.Digital Marketing Strategy
•Interactive Communication (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube etc.
•Online Monitor System
2.Principle Prohibiting Television Commercials.
3.Principle of Emphasis on Publicity.
4.Principle of Brand Muse.
5.Principle of Having Customers Lined up at Stores.
6.Principle of the Excuse of Supply Shortages.
Table 4 : Comparison of Strategies that are Chosen by Burberry and LVMH
6.0CURRENT INSIGHTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In view of the case study was reported back in 2004, we further examined the current development of Burberry. We have noted that as at December 2013, Burberry is still facing trademark and copyright issues whereby China has cancelled trademark protection for the tartan print of Burberry sighting that the Company did not use the design for the past three years, though Burberry still has a valid trademark until 2020. Should Burberry failed in the case, the rivals will have the advantage of producing the design. On top of this, Burberry been criticized for the tagline ‘Made in Britain’ when it had relocated its plant to China to combat with rising production costs. Another bombard that landed on Burberry was the announcement of the resignation of its CEO Angela Ahrendts to join Apple in 2014, which resulted a 6% drop in the share price. All these clearly indicate that Burberry is heavily competed, and it is still struggling with ‘brand sustainability’.
In order to address the problems faced by Burberry either now or then, we would propose some measures that we believe would restore the glory and assist the company to achieve sustainability advantage. Firstly, Burberry could re-visit its marketing communications mix. In the case study, Burberry engaged few established celebrities to do the advertisements which contributed the whole repositioning and rebranding of the Company. They were able to portray themselves from old and contemporary outlook to modern, fashion-oriented and youthful. We would recommend Burberry to advertise in Cinemas for remarkable results, and also focus on internet to reach young targets.
In order to draw attention to the variety of products that Burberry has, Burberry could deploy coupon sales by giving discounts, or introduce contests with lucrative prizes to increase awareness of its brand categories. We also recommend Burberry to have tie-in promotions with other established companies such as departmental stores Marks & Spencer, Harrods or Peter Jones to increase pulling power.
Plans like organising fashion shows in compelling way would address the outreach of non-target consumer problem, and introduce the types of ‘Check’ patterns Burberry has in store. A further study of the Consumers’ psychographic will certainly help Burberry to understand its consumers.
Cause-related Marketing (CRM) has gained popularity whereby firms have alliances with charitable organisations. Burberry could work jointly probably with National Heart & Lung Institutes or Cancer Organisation, and agree to donate certain percentage of sales to the organisation. This would certainly attract the consumers to hit two birds at one stone, and eliminate the stodgy reputations of Burberry.
Burberry would gain benefits by using interactive marketing such as E-shopping or E-catalogues in user friendly mode. There are few visualisation software Burberry could invest in to attract the young and sexy in order to have a glimpse of the products should it be worn by someone tall or fat. This will certainly impact Burberry in its brand positioning sustainability.
Social media could be useful tool for Burberry to get consumers to share their experience, exchange views and ponder their experiential experience with Burberry. Word-of-Mouth is powerful in getting the business to expand confidently, and spread its wing to other regions of the world cohesively.
We recommend Burberry to continuously innovate and keep abreast with the trends of the market segments. This means Burberry concentrates on the design and quality enhancements, by controlling the licensees to observe the by-laws. Which means Burberry will take stern actions against those wholesalers who simply sell the products to other unauthorised distributors, and condone imitation activities.
Besides the above, we recommend Burberry to conduct a study on the existing supply chain management, address the shortfalls and rectify the issues the earliest possible. This is to weed out potential competitors to gain advantage on Burberry’s weaknesses, and also to remain sustainable in brand positioning.
We believe Burberry should consider Lean Six Sigma, though expensive, to eliminate eight potential wastage identified by the model at a rate of 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPO) such as waiting, defects, overproduction, non-utilized talent, transportation, inventory, motion, extra-processing provision of goods and service. When the going gets tough, the tough get going, so will be Burberry and we believe this would become the motivating factor for Burberry to re-model, stay alert with the environment such as in China, and able to retain its business sustainability in long run.
We believe with the implementation of the recommended measures will assist Burberry to maximize customer value, obtain sustainable competitive advantage, build a cohesive vision and discipline that luxury goods retailer should possess. Therefore we conclude that Burberry will be able to outshine all the other rivals as the saying goes success is not final, failure is not fatal.
1.Are Burberry’s and Louis Vuitton’s Ubiquity Hurting Sales?, Retrieved 21 November 2013, http://fashionista.com/2012/12/burberry-louis-vuitton-sales-falter-as-anaylsts-worry-luxury-labels-are-becoming-too-ubiquitous/
2.Burberry, retrieved 30 Novemberr 2013 from http://wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burberry
3.Baird, R. (2013). The Four Components of a Fast-Paced Organization: Going Beyond Lean Sigma Tools. CRC Press.
4.Burberry-SWOT Analysis (2012), Retrieved November 25, 2013, from http://www.mbaskool.com/lifestyle-and-retail/2058-burberry.html
5.Burberry Is A Luxury Fashion House From Britain Marketing Essay, Retrieved November 25, 2013, from
6.Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). Competitiveness: business model reconfiguration for innovation and internationalization. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 8(2), 123-149.
7.Cadwalladr, C. (2012, July 16) The hypocrisy of Burberry’s ‘Made in Britain’ appeal. The Observer. Retrieved on December 1, 2013, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/16/burberry-china-british-carole-cadwalladr
8.Handfield.R (2011) What is Supply Chain Management? NC State University, Retrieved on December 1, 2013, from http://scm.ncsu.edu/scm-articles/article/what-is-supply-chain-management
9.Jacobson, M. Lauren (2013), Burberry Case Study: Retrived from http://laurenmjacobson .wordpress.com/case-studies/burberry-case-study at 20 November 2013
10.London.B. (2013, November 29). Will Burberry lose the rights to its famous check design? Luxury fashion house appeals as China cancels tartan trademark. MailOnline. Retrieved on December 1, 2013, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2515445/Is-Burberry-losing-rights-infamous-checked-design-Fashion-house-threat.html#ixzz2mKoPVdSH
11.Moon Youngme(2004). Burberry. Harvard Business Review
12.Nagasawa, Shin’ya (2008), Luxury Brand Strategy of Louis Vuitton: Graduate school of Commerce, Waseda University Tokyo, Japan.
13.Polidoro, F., & Toh, P. K. (2011). Letting rivals come close or warding them off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 369-392
14.The History, Heritage and Quality of the Luxury Brand, Burberry, retrieved 30 November 2013 from http://www.eatlovesavor.com/the-history-heritage-and-quality-of-the-luxury-brand-burberry/
15.Traill-Nash. G (2013, December 03). Personal Oz – essentials: Cannabis to
Cite this page
Burberry Case Study. (2016, Mar 09). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/burberry-case-study-essay