War and Love in "Editha" by William Dean Howells

When discussing the topic of war, it becomes evident that people possess diverse and often conflicting viewpoints. Some argue that war is a means to achieve peace, while others vehemently maintain the opposite belief that war only leads to the destruction of peace. In William Dean Howells' poignant novella, "Editha," he explores two starkly contrasting attitudes towards war. George, the fiancé of the titular character, Editha, holds the view that war shatters the world's peace. Conversely, Editha perceives war as an honorable pursuit and rejects the existence of true peace in the world.

Editha's Perspective on War

Editha firmly believes that a man should undertake something of worth to prove his love for her and his devotion to his country, which, in her eyes, necessitates participation in a war.

However, I respectfully disagree with her stance.

Firstly, the moment a society plunges into war, peace becomes an elusive concept. War results in the painful separation of families and countries, exacting a devastating toll that no one can truly afford to bear.

Secondly, in matters of love, a man can certainly demonstrate his worthiness to win a woman's heart through means other than engaging in warfare.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Free Essays

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Love is not a game where victory yields immediate rewards; it is a solemn and profound commitment where many lives are lost, and countless families are left bereft.

Thirdly, there exist numerous ways for a man to express his love for his country, none of which necessitate war as a means of validation. In essence, Editha's perspective on war diverges significantly from my own.

Editha's Belief in the Glory of War

At the outset of the story, Editha makes the fateful decision to encourage George to enlist in the war effort.

She passionately kisses him and articulates her perception of the war, exclaiming, "How glorious!" Through the narrative, Editha's reasons for glorifying war become apparent.

Firstly, Editha's beliefs are influenced by the sensationalist style of journalism prevalent during the late 19th century. Yellow journalism, characterized by sensationalism over factual reporting, played a pivotal role in fanning public anger over incidents such as the sinking of the USS Maine. Editha, like many others, appears to have been swayed by the press's influence.

Secondly, she holds the belief that there is no true peace in the world. As she vehemently states, "That ignoble peace! It was no peace at all, with that crime and shame at our very gates." Her perspective is informed by the prevailing sentiment of her time, which was colored by the sensationalist media.

Thirdly, Editha feels that God is on her side, declaring, "Because God meant it to be war." However, it is crucial to note that my perspective differs significantly from Editha's. I do not consider war to be a glorious affair. Instead, I believe that war wreaks havoc on families and nations, causing immeasurable suffering.

A Clear-Sighted Perspective on War

When confronted with the realities of war, it is imperative to maintain a clear and discerning view of the entire situation. Unfortunately, Editha's circumstances do not afford her the luxury of such clarity. I am fortunate to live in a time of relative peace, which enables me to critically evaluate the information presented to me. Nevertheless, I empathize with Editha's position, as I recognize that sensational journalism can distort the truth and manipulate public perception.

For instance, during the Great Leap Forward Movement in China from 1958 to 1960, sensational journalism exerted a significant influence, with slogans like "the more bold we are, the more crops we can grow" becoming prevalent. In such an environment, it is plausible that I, too, might succumb to the allure of sensational journalism, especially if lacking access to a comprehensive education.

However, where Editha and I diverge is in our perception of peace in the world. While she believes there is no true peace, I maintain that peace is attainable. This fundamental difference informs our respective attitudes toward war, with me rejecting the notion that war is an honorable pursuit.

Perspectives on Love

Editha posits that a man should undertake a heroic act, such as going to war, to prove his love and worthiness to win a woman's heart. She insists, "But now, it flashed upon her, if he could do something worthy to have won her – be a hero, her hero – it would be even better than if he had done it before asking her." Editha's desire for a man to engage in warfare to impress her starkly contrasts with my own viewpoint.

I believe that a man can demonstrate his worthiness and love for a woman through different means, such as dedicated focus on his work and continuous improvement in his pursuits. Additionally, a man who prioritizes his family and stands by his partner during times of need is equally commendable in my eyes. Such qualities resonate more deeply with me than a man's involvement in a war.

The Notion of Proving Love for One's Country

In the letter Editha pens to George, she emphasizes the belief that a man must go to war to demonstrate his love for his country. She writes, "But the man I marry must love his country first of all, and be able to say to me, 'I could not love thee, dear, so much, Loved I not honor more.' There is no honor above America with me. In this great hour there is no other honor."

It is evident that Editha holds a profound love for her country, but her perspective is somewhat myopic. She fails to consider the devastating consequences of war, including the loss of innocent lives, the exorbitant costs incurred, and the potential ruination of the homeland itself. My perspective diverges significantly from Editha's, as I believe that there are alternative, peaceful ways for individuals to express their love for their country, ways that do not exact such a heavy toll.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Editha" by William Dean Howells portrays the complex and often conflicting perspectives on war and love. While some individuals, like Editha, view participation in war as a means to demonstrate their love for their country, they often fail to acknowledge the profound and devastating consequences of armed conflict. War, with its inherent destruction and suffering, should not be glorified, but rather approached with caution and a deep understanding of its implications. Instead of seeking validation through war, individuals can express their love for their country in peaceful and constructive ways that contribute to the betterment of society while preserving the precious gift of peace.