The Dissolution of the Monasteries

The most crucial consequences of the dissolution of the monasteries was its effect on society Explain why you agree with this view

The dissolution of the abbeys in between 1536 and 1541 were substantial in their own right. However, they likewise had far reaching implications in terms of their result on England, culturally, socially and in regards to the Church, with the level of the repercussions being affected by the brief and long term implications of all three of these issues.

Firstly, the significance of the dissolution of the monasteries was extensive not just since of the manner in which it effected society however likewise due to the fact that of the far reaching affects in which it had on all areas of society.

This in truth is highlighted by the obvious social vacuum which appeared as an outcome of the dissolution of the monasteries. The loss of Monastic health centers which effected the locals as well as the Monasteries hospitality in providing free food and care was likewise lost not only increasing destitution but developing an aspect of social resistance within England.

Get quality help now

Dr. Karlyna PhD

Verified writer

Proficient in: Culture

4.7 (235)

“ Amazing writer! I am really satisfied with her work. An excellent price as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

When coupled with the prompt increase in land in which the nobles ultimately received handing them additional power and influence within the court whilst simultaneously increasing the scope of the elite, we see that whilst the genuine significance of the dissolution might be debatable particularly when concerning the destitute, the far reaching implications in which the dissolution of the monasteries had on all sectors of society show that it was crucial in the sense that all sections within England's social spectrum in 1536 were to some extent effected.

On the other hand however, the exact same conclusion can not be applied when evaluating the significance of the dissolutions influence on culture. The architectural damage by itself may not have been of great significance and neither might the loss of 600 books in Worchester priory at the time. However, the damage of monastic structures which partly assisted with the facilitating of education shows the significance of the cultural effect in which the dissolution of the abbeys had In regards to the fact that it paved the method for long-lasting social development through the methods of present cultural modification deliberately or not by Henry.

Finally the impact in which the dissolution of the monasteries had on the church took on importance more for what it represented than in a truly practical sense in regards to the fact that it represented the end of the work which had preceded it in 1535 via Henry’s attempts to consolidate Royal Supremacy. Furthermore the dissolution enabled a fundamental re-organsation of the Church which Wolsey in-particular had attempted to implement.

In conclusion, whilst the extent of the impact in which the dissolution of the monasteries had on society is up for historical debate, the manner in which all sections of society be it the poor via the continued aggravation of poverty or the nobles via increased influence, were affected both in the short and long term as well as the shift in power which would become significant in the near future means that in reality, the most important consequences of the dissolution of the monasteries was its impact on society