The Differences and Similarities of Followership and Servant Leadership

This manuscript will compare and contrast the differences and similarities between followership and servant leadership. When working together it is important to have a stable ground for both sides to operate. Although they play different roles, they share similar way of executing their jobs. When a sense of wholeness is adapted through trust and respect, finishing tasks and operating will become natural to servants and followers.

“Followership is the dexterity to be able to take direction well, to be a part of a program, and to play a role in achieving a task.

” (McCallum, McCallum, & I. H. Asper School of Business). While playing a part in these formats, your leadership expects flexibility and willingness from you. Having an open mindset is habitual by your leader and subordinates. It is important to take direction, any miscommunication, or disagreement and put a hiatus on your mission. By trusting the process and using your specific skillset, allows your team or program work accordingly. Servants put emphasis on carrying your own weight.

Get quality help now

Sweet V

Verified writer

Proficient in: Leadership Styles

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

These few characteristics (of many) give you a general interpretation of how servants foresee their following culture.

Following, this iota will give you the general understanding of servant leadership. “Servant leadership places primary importance on the institutions essential concern.” (THE NCO.” Army University Press). While in a servant leadership position, it is important to give your follower the sense of togetherness by you. If a servant is providing a sense of chagrin, they will not have an accepting group of followers. With no following, he or she will not be a leader.

Servants are dexterous and are capable of emphasizing multiple facets at different junctures. By being flexible and understanding, a servant should have no trouble in a leadership role.

In this segment are the similarities between followership and servant leadership. Both of these aspects share very important features that work for both sectors. Active listening allows both roles eligibility of informal agreement. The acceptance of both sides also plays a crucial role, if either side is not complying; the mission-oriented task is unachievable. Deductible reasoning allows each area of emphasis to come to a common ground. Both groups use essential resources for critical thinking, which allows the understanding of issues to conclude problems. (Dr. Facione, Peter 'Insight Assessment'). In addition, both sides are working to achieve the same goal.

In conclusion, to become and servant you must learn to be a follower. You must gain the traits through trial and error and organizational training. While in a followership role, you must learn to have patience and carry your own weight when told. When as acting as a servant you must be able to care for your following and give your feedback when given the chance. Giving rapport is also important as a servant because your following can tell when the sense of empathy is absent. Fellowship and servants share assets such as achieving a common goal, active listening and must gain acceptance. If all these qualities are fulfilled your program can operate as one.