Strengths and weaknesses of the theory

As discussed, Bandura’s theory has many points of strength, notable of which being that it describes the relationship in between habits and the environment. In addition, the theory offers a clear photo of how habits are learned and established. On the other hand, it appears that the theory puts excessive emphasis on what takes place to people rather than what the people do. Along the same line, the theory does not deal with consistent differences amongst people as they go through various developmental phases.


Habits is affected by and likewise impacts individual factors and the environment. According to Bandura’s cognitive theory, there are 5 fundamental abilities that help with the learning process in person, particularly symbolizing ability, vicarious ability, forethought capability, self-regulatory and self-reflection capabilities. All these add to self-efficacy. Bandura’s cognitive theory highlights that people with high opinion of themselves usually accomplish more and encounter less distressing situations.

The theory also identifies different personalities based on how they perceive different situations and how they behave.

References Bandura A. (2006). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Chicago: Aldine Transaction. Bandura, A. (1997).Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman Company Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Professional Technical. Bandura, A. (1976) Social learning theory. New York: Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Chicago: Aldine- Atherton.

Cite this page

Strengths and weaknesses of the theory. (2017, May 19). Retrieved from

Are You on a Short Deadline? Let a Professional Expert Help You
Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7