Starbucks Organizational Strategy
Starbucks Organizational Strategy
In order to be successful in the globally competitive market, it is crucial that companies are aware of the important role organizational strategy plays in a businesses’ operations. Starbucks achieved worldwide success by implementing organizational strategies that are aligned with their organizational goals and mission. This report evaluates all the components required in organizational strategy. The Five Forces Industry and SWOT Analysis discovers Starbucks’ competitive position in the coffee industry. Starbucks’ competitive advantage will be determined after completing a competitive analysis of their top competitors. With an in-depth look at Starbucks’ mission, we can see whether they are embodying it and if they are showing organizational effectiveness. Then, we will look at which kinds of corporate and positioning strategies Starbucks is employing and assess which companies they might benchmark against. Lastly, a thorough analysis of their external environments will illustrate how Starbucks’ external factors influence their strategies.
Five Industry Forces
Organizations use the Five Industry Forces as a tool for understanding their competitive positions in the industry. The Five Industry Forces helps companies discover how attractive their industry is by determining the threat level of five forces that influence the industry. The character of the rivalry, threat of new entrants, threat of substitute products or services, and bargaining powers of suppliers and buyers are the five forces that must be taken into account when measuring the industry Starbucks competes in.
Character of Rivalry
Character of the rivalry measures the intensity of competitions’ behaviors. There are many companies competing in the same industry as Starbucks. However, each competitor has their own unique strategy based on serving their specific target market as opposed to directly competing against each other. For example, Starbucks and Tim Hortons compete in the same industry but have different priorities. Starbucks focuses on creating an atmosphere that customers are comfortable in and Tim Hortons focuses on being a Canadian company.
Threat of New Entrants
The threat of new entrants measures the degree of new companies entering in this industry. Starbucks has a relatively low threat of new entrants. Newcomers come into the industry and find it hard to compete because the existing firms have brand equity and customer loyalty. Although it is possible for new entrants to thrive, it is quite unlikely because of the market share holders.
Threat of Substitute Products or Services
The threat of substitute products is how easily customers are able to substitute one product or service for another. Coffee is one of the most popular beverages in the world but has a variety of substitutes, such as tea, juice, iced drinks, and smoothies. Recognizing the high threat of these substitutes, Starbucks diversified their menu items and included hot tea drinks, iced tea drinks, and low-calorie refreshers. In addition, they have their own tea brand called Tazo, which is valued at $1.4 billion.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Bargaining power of suppliers measures the influence the supplier has on the inputs sold to the company. Starbucks has a high threat of bargaining power of suppliers because of their high standards for their coffee. Although, the coffee industry is standardized and there are many coffee bean suppliers, Starbucks need the highest quality coffee beans. This gives the bargaining power to the suppliers of the high quality coffee beans. However, Starbucks launched an international program to give additional benefits to their coffee farmers to ensure its supply of coffee beans.
(Management Case Incident, n.d) Bargaining Power of Buyers
Bargaining power of buyers specifies the customers’ influence on the prices of the business’ products or services. Starbucks has a relatively low threat from bargaining power of buyers because they are not dependent on a few high-volume buyers. Starbucks is the largest coffee retailer and has a large number of buyers purchasing their products. Although, customers are not able to influence product prices, they do obtain some power. If Starbucks drastically raise their prices, customers will substitute their products for a cheaper one. Based on the Five Industry Forces, Starbucks’ industry has a high attractiveness due to the low threats of character rivalry, new entrants, and bargaining power of buyers. Starbucks is able to determine the strengths and weaknesses in their position in the industry. With this knowledge, they are able to implement strategies that minimize their weaknesses. Starbucks handled their high threat of substitutes by expanding their product range which gave customers more variety to choose from. Starbucks’ international program with benefits served as an incentive for their suppliers to continue providing them with high quality coffee beans.
1. Established brand equity throughout the world
2. Valued and motivated employees, good work environment
3. Most recognized brand in the specialty coffee business
4. Provides customers with a café experience unlike no other coffee retailers
5. Loyal customer base willing to pay premium prices for Starbucks products
6. Sustained market share in the coffee industry
1. Products are more expensive than competitors’ products
2. 76.5% of Starbucks’ revenue comes from the US
3. Coffee beans price is the major influence over firm’s profits
1. New technological advances that are more efficient
2. Sociocultural trends that could increase demand in their products
3. New product offerings
1. Threat of substitutes for their products
2. Threat of bargaining power of their suppliers
4. Exposed to commodity price fluctuations
5. Threat of coffee bean supply problems
A SWOT Analysis is an effective tool for companies to determine what their strengths are, their weaknesses they need to work on, the opportunities they have, and external threats imposing risk. Based on the SWOT Analysis, Starbucks is not only recognized worldwide for their coffee, but are recognized for their amazing relationships with their employees and customers. Although, Starbucks faces many threats in the coffee industry, they are able to take preventive measures against them. Even though their products are priced higher than their competition, Starbucks’ brand equity dominate this weakness.
Dominates in kids’ target market
Offers products that can be enjoyed along with a beverage
Costs are at least 20% less than Starbucks
Highly successful regional promotional programs(e.g. program with Curt Schilling, an All-star baseball player)
Various additional benefits for eligible employees(e.g. future planning bonus)
Weak presence in other areas besides Northern US
Focuses on a single type of product; lack of diversification on menu
Stores are located inconveniently
Limited expenditure on marketing its products
Getting lower prices for raw materials as high-volume buyers
High recognition with the brand itself around the world
Cost leader; offering food at prices cannot be competed with
Quick production and speedy delivery food
Largest fast food market share around the world
Low barrier to entry
Unhealthy food menu based on the consciousness of health caring
Low differentiation of products from other fast food brands
Decreasing sales revenue because of weak sales and innovation
High employee turnover
Starbucks’ Competitive Advantages
Based on the competitive analysis, Starbucks has some strong competitive advantages.
1. Abundant Products. Starbucks stores claim they are able to produce more than 80,000 varied combinations, most of which cannot be provided by their competitors. Aside from the core products, they also offers a variety of other products, such as fresh food (ex. Baked pastries, sandwiches, and salads), handcrafted beverages and merchandise (ex. Home espresso machines, coffee brewers and grinders, coffee mugs and so on).
2. Special Customer Experience. The philosophy of Schultz, chairman of Starbucks, is “We’re in people business, serving coffee”. Based on this idea, Starbucks not only provides fine coffee, but it is also a comfortable, warm experience for customers. Starbucks stores are designed with special ambiance-aromas, music and decorations-all arousing a relaxing and warm feeling as at home. This feeling of community connection makes customers form a strong emotional attachment and maintain a long term relationship with Starbucks.
3. Unique Employee Relationship. Starbucks value their employees as key factors in its business. The numerous benefits that are provided to employees include health care, stock options, and training. Any employee working more than 20 hours a week is eligible for health care benefits and stock options. Starbucks treats its employees as partners by allowing them to purchase the company’s stock, which makes the employees feel that they work for a business that they are responsible for. The employees are trained on customer service, beverage and food preparation, and point of sale.
4. Constant Innovation. Starbucks continues to introduce new ideas into its business. It introduced Starbucks Reward Card which helps build loyalty as well as returning benefit. It even allows its customers to pay by phone. Starbucks also extends its business to entertainment field, such as music, books and films, which shapes it as a part of pop culture. To maintain its competitive advantages, Starbucks should keep its passion for products. It is important to keep the products at the same high quality customers are used to, even as they extend their products. At the level of the customer, Starbucks should attract new customers in order to develop new markets and maintain their present customer relationship. Contributing to society and benefiting employees should be continued because it boosts the company’s reputation and morale. Most importantly, Starbucks should keep innovation in its mind, as it gives the company the power to move forward.
Starbucks’ mission is “to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time” (Starbucks, 2014). It is devoted to providing the finest coffee for customers while sticking to its uncompromising principles. Starbuck is “living” its mission in its daily business, as explained at the different levels shown below.
1. Coffee. Starbucks is enthusiastic about offering the best coffee, setting a high standard for sourcing coffee beans and keeps tight control for processing coffee products. Meanwhile Starbucks is proactive about improving the lives of people growing coffee beans. It has launched a program to offer better pay to coffee farmers and participate in programs to help coffee farmers who are victims of the natural disasters.
2. Partners. Starbucks views its employees as partners. They implement many benefits to their employees and give them the option of purchasing stock. These methods are an excellent way to motivate the employees because provides job enrichment. Starbucks also requires partners to treat each other with dignity and respect as included in the standards for business conduct.
3. Customers. Starbucks promises their customers the best products and is passionate about being their one and only stop for coffee. Employees are trained to make each drink to the highest quality, and the same at every Starbucks around the world. Starbucks is passionate about providing their customers with a comfortable experience and building a long term relationship.
4. Stores. Starbucks stores are located at convenient locations around the world, making it easier for customers to get their favourite drinks. Every Starbucks is designed to offer customers a warm ambiance, and to make them feel like they are at home. It is devoted to being a place where one can meet friends, enjoy life and take a break.
5. Neighborhood. Starbucks regards itself as a part of local communities and takes on the role of a “good neighbour.” Stores are required to donate to local causes and charities. To protect local environment, Starbucks promotes with the use of recycled and reusable cups for its products. Starbucks also has protect the rainforest campaigns and fundraisers.
6. Shareholders. Starbucks makes an effort to enhance market share and increase profits, in attempts to maintain and increase shareholders Organizational Strategy Effectiveness
The evolving coffee industry faces many competing priorities and changing environments. In Starbuck’s case, their organizational strategy helps them overcome those factors. For an organizational strategy to be effective, it must effectively accomplish the tasks that help implement the organizational objectives, which for Starbucks is “to be the leading retailer and brand of coffee in each of their target markets by selling the finest quality coffee and related products, and by providing each customer a unique Starbucks experience.” (Starbucks, 2013) Also, companies must use environmental scanning to understand external forces of the organization and to see the threats and opportunities. One of Starbucks’ strategies to achieve their organizational goal is through the use of ethical sourcing. An example is Starbucks’ international program that “offers better pay to coffee farmers who treat their workers and the environment decently.” This strategy appeals to consumers because it shows that Starbucks is a reliable company that cares about people and the environment. Moreover, the importance of corporate social responsibility is rising. (White, 2012) People want to know that they are purchasing from an ethical and responsible company. Therefore, Starbucks’ program will attract and retain consumers.
Secondly, Starbucks’ launch of the prepaid Starbucks Card moves them closer to their organizational goal. “More than 77 million Starbucks Cards have been activated and loaded with more than $1 billion.” When a beverage is purchased with the Starbucks Card, a Star is given to the member. There are three reward levels such as Welcome, Green, and Gold. Each level delivers different benefits. This strategy ensures customer loyalty and at the same time builds brand equity. People love reward programs and perks as it gives a sense of belonging and value. The Starbucks society created through these cards allows members to feel important as they are showered with benefits and consequently drives up sales. Also, what contributed to the card’s success is how user-friendly it is. Starbucks made it really easy to reload, purchase, and use the cards. All these factors contribute to the effectiveness of Starbucks’ strategy. Starbucks understands the trends in their external environment and regularly looks for opportunities and threats – Starbucks started many programs that corresponded to the rising trend of corporate social responsibility. They also launched the Starbucks Card, which generated more than $1 billion of sales. Both of these strategic initiatives generated more sales, customer loyalty, and brand equity, which helped fulfill their objective of being the leading retailer and brand of coffee. Hence, their organizational strategy is effective.
Since the first coffee shop opened in Seattle in 1971, Starbucks Corporation has created a global business empire over the last two decades. As the world’s leading retailer of specialty coffee, it has created a cultural phenomenon making the way we drink and eat significantly different from the way we used to. Its innovative concept of “cafe life” helps the company maintain its dominant position in the global market. Starbucks uses portfolio strategy instead of grand strategy. Despite the fact that Starbucks develops its products with coffee as the core business, investing among different product lines helps the company minimize the risks during business operations. There is no doubt that Starbucks’ core product is coffee, and every business and product the company has launched is to give customers a better “coffee experience”. This concept uses a related diversification approach to enhance its business.
For example, the company offers various products in addition to coffee, such as fresh pastries, snacks, “drinkware”, coffee equipment, music and the famous Starbucks Card. Yet the sentiment behind these products is to give the customer a brand new coffee experience. All of Starbucks’ products share the company’s strong corporate culture – bringing customers a new lifestyle and the ultimate coffee experience. The appendix shows two BCG Matrix tables (camillemarier, 2011) for Starbucks regarding its products and the market position. We can see that even though the company has some STAR products such as smoothies and bottled drinks, most of the profits Starbucks makes come from coffee and common drinks (Cash Cows). Starbucks is the leader in the coffee market as Starbucks coffee is accepted as the most popular coffee in the world, which supports the company’s strong position and profits in the global market.
The price of a cup of Starbucks coffee is generally higher than a similar product offered by a competitor. This is because Starbucks insists on using the best coffee beans and equipment during the production, making it hard for them to lower its production cost. Instead of the cost leadership strategy, we believe that the company is working on transferring its focus strategy into the differentiation strategy. It is true that before Howard Schultz, Starbucks was just a coffee retailer. The only purpose of the company was to sell more coffee to the customers it could reach and make more profits out of it. However, during the transformation of the company, Starbucks successfully developed a new strategy which allowed the company to offer a higher-than-average price without worrying about their market share falling. For starters, the differentiation strategy of Starbucks comes from the strong brand image the company has created during the last two decades. The distinctive two-tailed siren logo represents the culture and commitment of the company – offering the coffee and related products with high quality and giving customers a better experience and lifestyle.
It has been proven that the company has chosen the right strategy that best suits their purpose. People are willing to pay a premium price for Starbucks coffee because of the extra value it provides. When they are buying a Starbucks coffee, they are buying more than just a simple coffee. Furthermore, another comparative advantage that Starbucks has is its unique products. For example, by collaborating with Pepsi-Cola, Starbucks created their Frappuccino and DoubleShot coffee, and Starbucks ice cream was developed with Dreyer’s. The cooperation between Starbucks and other companies makes Starbucks’ products difficult to imitate, therefore the company has managed to minimize the risk of substitutions of its products. At last, we can see that Starbucks creates differentiation of its products through high customer satisfaction, unique customer experience, and ongoing social responsibility. Therefore, Starbucks has a huge customer base that are very loyal, not just in United States, but also in many countries around the world. Their brand equity delivers huge value for the company since it is almost impossible to copy.
A benchmark is a standard or point of reference that companies are compared to or assessed against. It is a way to measure a company’s growth, strength and improvements. (The Free Dictionary, 2014) Many of today’s most successful companies, started off by benchmarking leading competitors and observing their actions in order to achieve success. Starbucks is considered a benchmark in the business world, however Starbucks also benchmarks other successful companies. In 2011, Starbucks held a market share of 32.6% (Statista, 2011) and in 2012 had revenues of $13.29billion (Wikipedia, 2014) Dunkin’ Donuts, the second leading coffee shop in the US had half the market share with only 16.1% and only $6.9billion in revenues (Wikipedia, 2014). Dunkin’ Donuts might benchmark Starbucks as a company to compare themselves against. Dunkin’ Donuts has been growing exponentially over the last few years and is gaining market share very quickly. Even though there are several differences between the two companies, Dunkin’ Donuts may still potentially benchmark against Starbucks by comparing growth, advertising and products offered.
A coffee based company like Tim Horton’s might also benchmark Starbucks for various reasons. In 2012, Tim Horton’s had revenues of $3.12 billion, almost $10 billion behind Starbucks, and an international establishment. (Tim Horton’s, 2012) Tim Horton’s using Starbucks as a benchmark would help them increase their profits. Tim Horton’s might observe the tactics and strategies used by Starbucks and apply it to their own business model. Things to look at training tactics and programs to better their employees at each location, advertising methods and channels, and organizational efficiency. It would be important for Tim Horton’s to compare and evaluate their organizational efficiency in relation to Starbuck’s and identify the main points of difference, and if applicable apply changes to its own company. Benchmarking Starbucks would give Tim Horton’s the opportunity to grow and increase revenues. However, Starbucks still has a lot of room for growth and might benchmark itself against other leading companies. For example, McDonald’s had revenues of $27.56billion in 2012 (Wikipedia, 2014).
Although McDonald’s is much different from Starbucks, Starbucks can compare themselves to McDonald’s by assessing their advertising, loyalty programs and social responsibility. McDonald’s currently has more worldwide locations, offers a larger variety of products and has several affiliations, including the Olympics. By using McDonald’s as a benchmark, Starbucks can mimic some of these behaviours and successfully grow as a larger, more profitable company. Starbucks is working on expanding its international market and becoming more relevant around the world, this is something that McDonald’s has already mastered therefore, this is one aspect of McDonald’s that applies to Starbucks and can be benchmarked against. Another leading company in the coffee industry is Nestlé’s Nescafé. Nescafé alone had $10.7billion (Forbes, 2013) in 2013 worldwide and is #27 on the list of World’s most valuable brands, compared to Starbucks who is 76. (Forbes, 2014) Starbucks might use Nescafé as a benchmark because of the differences between the two companies.
Many consumers live a busy life and do not have time to stop off at a coffee shop on the way to work, Nescafé is more readily available to customers as a home brewing coffee, suitable to consumer needs. Nescafé is also a recognized brand worldwide, not just in coffee. Starbucks might benchmark against Nescafé in attempt to increase their scope and diversification. Benchmarking is not necessarily only about revenues and profits. Starbucks is an extremely profitable company that would benchmark other companies for reasons besides profits. Companies would benchmark against Starbucks for the things Starbucks, as an international brand, does well. Companies often use benchmarking as an opportunity for their company to grow, in all aspects. The Link between the External Environment and Starbucks’ Strategy Starbucks strives to provide their customers with the best café experience. This experience includes Starbucks’ high quality coffee, ambiance and most importantly, the experience the customer has while at their shops. Starbucks has found a way to implement this strategy by using certain external factors to their advantage.
These external factors include, customers and sociocultural trends. Social media and mobile apps have become the most popular trends amongst today’s population. These trends have changed the way people communicate and has become an essential part of everyday life. One of the most popular social media sites in 2013 was Twitter. Starbucks saw this as an opportunity to interact with this customers and released their “Tweet-A-Coffee” campaign. This campaign allows Twitter users to send their Twitter friends and followers a $5 Starbucks Card eGift. Partnering with the popular social media site established customer connections and relationships which contributed to the café experience. As smart phones grew more and more popular, mobile apps grew more and more popular. Mobile apps provided smart phone users with an easier and faster way to connect. Starbucks took advantage of the sociocultural trend with their free mobile apps for iPhones and Androids. The Starbucks App made it easier for customers to make purchases, check and reload account balances, and view transactions. In 2013, CEO Howard Schultz reported that the Starbucks App had “over 7 million users which translated into 2.1 million mobile payment transactions each week with hundreds of thousands of additional Starbucks mobile app downloads each week.” (GSM Association, 2014)
It is clear that this development was a huge success and added to the overall café experience. Starbucks’ strategy has always been to create the best café experience. To achieve this, Starbucks must be aware of their external environments and accordingly make plans to adjust to changes. As a way to better their customers’ café experience, Starbucks implemented their “Tweet-A-Coffee” campaign and Starbucks Mobile Apps. Starbucks’ Position on the Environmental Uncertainty Matrix How well company managers can understand or predict the external changes and trends that affect their businesses depends on the company’s environmental change, environmental complexity, and resource scarcity. Environmental change is how fast the companies’ general and specific environments change. Environmental complexity is the number and significance of the external factors that affect the company. Resource scarcity is the shortage of critical resources in an organization’s external environment.
Starbucks has a stable environment because their rate of environmental change is slow. This is primarily because the coffee industry has been relatively steady. The industry hasn’t faced any consistent changes in the way coffee is produced or delivered. Starbucks’ environment is affected by many external factors that hold great significance. During the economic recession in 2009, customers cut back on their spending which forced Starbucks to close 300 or more stores and lay off 700 employees. This illustrates how significant external factors are to Starbucks’ operations.
Starbucks is known for their high quality coffee. To achieve their high standards of coffee, Starbucks faces the problem of resource scarcity. In 2013, a fungal disease devastated coffee plantations in Central America. Following this outbreak, Starbucks bought a 600-acre farm in Costa Rica to develop new coffee varieties and methods to eliminate the fungal disease that imposed as a great threat to their company.
On the Environmental Uncertainty Matrix, Starbucks has a medium level of uncertainty. Although Starbucks has a high level of resource scarcity and a number of significant external factors, their company has a stable environment. A low rate of environmental change means that Starbucks’ environment has and most likely will remain the same over a period of months or years. In stable environments, it is easier to predict external changes and implement plans to adapt.
To be known for their high quality coffee products and provide customers with the best café experience, Starbucks must be able to understand and predict external factors and trends that affect their businesses. Starbucks’ position on the matrix influences their strategy by causing them to focus on their significant external factors, such as their customers. If their customers’ needs and wants change, Starbucks must be able to understand their desires and make changes to their strategy accordingly. For example, when customers started desiring fruity, low-calorie drinks, Starbucks launched their Starbucks Refreshers beverages. These beverages were a huge success as they met the customers’ desires for a low-calorie refreshment. Based on Starbucks’ medium level of uncertainty, they are capable of predicting external forces that affect their companies. How well they are able to handle these forces is depends on how well they are able to understand the significance of their external factors.
Starbucks is a leader not only in the coffee industry, but in the entire business industry. After analyzing this international company’s five industry forces, it is obvious that Starbucks is in a great competitive position. Starbucks continues to focus on a related diversification and differentiation strategy to raise the company’s product value. Their competitive advantages and consistency with their mission are a major factor in the company’s success. By diligently putting their efforts in corporate social responsibility, ethical sourcing, and innovative products Starbucks moves closer to their organizational objectives and consequently proving their strategy as effective. Starbucks, will continue to be used as a benchmark as the coffee and beverage industry grows, however Starbucks will also benchmark other leading companies in the attempt to achieve maximum potential. The external environment has the ability to influence a corporation’s strategy and Starbucks is constantly analyzing their environments to ensure that any changes in external factors are aligned with their strategic vision.
3ZM. (2010). Dunkin’ Donuts Hypothetical Marketing Strategy Case. Adam. (2010). Dunkin Donuts SWOT Analysis. Smartdraw.
Antariksa, Y. (2012). Sample of SWOT Analysis : McDonald Reastaurant Case. StudyMarketing. camillemarier. (2011, 12 12). Livre Produit : Starbucks. Retrieved from Business clefs: http://businessclefs.wordpress.com/page/3/ Creative Guerrilla Marketing. (2014). Starbucks Tweet-A-Coffee Campaign Allows Users to Gift Via Twitter. Retrieved from Creative Guerrilla Marketing: http://www.creativeguerrillamarketing.com/social-media-marketing/starbucks-tweet-coffee-campaign-allows-users-gift-via-twitter/ Dow Jones & Company Inc. (2014). Starbucks Buys Its First Coffee Farm. Retrieved from The Wall Street Journal: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323639604578368741173186364 Forbes. (2013, November). Nescafe. Retrieved from Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/companies/nescafe/ Forbes. (2014). The World’s Most Valuable Brands. Retrieved from Forbes:
http://www.forbes.com/powerful-brands/list/ GlobalData. (Mar 2013). Starbucks Corporation- Financial and Strategic Analysis Review. Green, T. (2014). McDonald’s Weak Earnings Set to Continue. DailyFinance. GSM Association. (2014). Over 7M users for Starbucks payment app. Retrieved from mobileworldlive: http://www.mobileworldlive.com/over-7m-users-for-starbucks-payment-app Huggins, C. (2013). How will Starbucks maintain its competitive advantage? DesMoinesRegister. humanjukebox. (2008). Dunkin Donuts Competitive Analysis. Studymode. informationshelte. (2014). How does Starbucks differentiate itself from competitors? . Hubpages. Jennifer Azarian, K. K. (2012). U.S. Coffee and Snack Shop Industry: A Comparative Analysis of Starbucks and Dunkin’ Donuts. Jennifer Azarian, K. K. (2014). Porter’s Five Forces. Retrieved from Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts: https://sites.google.com/site/starbucksanddunkindonuts/porter-s-five-forces Jongbloed, J. (2013). Starbucks: Expensive, But A Great Company For Dividend Growth Investors. Management Case Incident, n.d. (n.d.).
SlideShare. (Mar 2011). Master in Business Strategy.
(2010). Starbucks Competitive Advantage. Blog.
(November 22, 2010). Starbucks Competitive Advantage. International Business. Starbucks, C. (2013). Fiscal 2013 Annual Report.
Statista. (2011). Market share of the leading coffee chains in the United States in 2011. Retrieved from Statista: http://www.statista.com/statistics/250166/market-share-of-major-us-coffee-shops/) SunnyChung. (2012). Mcdonald Competitive Advantage. Studymode. (2013). Sustainable Competitive Advantages of Starbucks. Hubpages. The Free Dictionary. (2014). Benchmark. Retrieved from The Free Dictionary: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/benchmark The Motley Fool. (2014). Starbucks’ Tazo Tea Brand Worth $1.4 Billion. Retrieved from The Motley Fool: http://beta.fool.com/mthiessen/2012/06/21/starbucks-tazo-tea-brand-worth-14-billion/6048/ The New York Times Company. (2009). Starbucks to Close 300 Stores and Open Fewer New Stores. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29sbux.html?_r=2& Tim Horton’s. (2012). Company Facts. Retrieved from Tim Horton’s: