Social Welfare in Canada

We often tend to forget that Canada, a wealthy country with abundant opportunities, suffers from hardship. Thankfully, the well-being system helps offer financial support to those who need it however lots of receivers abuse it, making the program highly controversial. The right of the spectrum believes that well-being has actually aggravated the issue of hardship which it need to be limited, hence making the bad responsible for their earnings. Meanwhile, the left side of the spectrum believes that the government is accountable for this and need to continue providing financial assistance to those in requirement.

The concern concerning well-being can be described through the structural-functionalism method, which sees society as "a system of interrelated parts that work together in order to operate in a steady, orderly way" (p. 19). By providing monetary support to those who remain in need, receivers can afford to pay for standard needs and try to find a job so that they too can contribute to society's economy and function.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Canada

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

This keeps them from owing money and affecting society in an unfavorable way.

Nevertheless, when receivers take this financial backing for approved and do not follow the desired actions such as using the cash carefully and looking for a job, this results in a hidden function which is dependence on this financial backing. The issue gets worse as welfare-dependent households have more kids who frequently end up being poor themselves, creating a continuing cycle of poverty. Additionally, abuse of the system also produces stress within society because some people are not adding to society's economy and operating the way they are expected to.

This annoys tax payers who in turn frequently look down on all individuals who require financial backing, even though the majority utilizes it wisely. In my opinion, the well-being program has the prospective to be very beneficial to the bad and society as whole but regrettably, like numerous other programs in Canada, our government fails to keep up with what the money is being invested in. Although hiring detectives would suggest an additional cost, I believe that this would assist immensely and decrease the quantity lost through the misuse of this monetary aid considerably.

Another issue with the program is that it is too easily accessible and as a result, too many people abuse it. The program could be improved by increasing and adding requirements such as being employed to have access to it unless they are officially unable to work (approved by a doctor). Finally, receivers should be obligated to look for jobs and have access to free guidance to ensure they are contributing to society, and this too should be investigated. If jobs are not plentiful, then it should be the government’s responsibility to create more jobs.