To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Patriotism, an emotion deeply embedded in the fabric of nations, finds expression in myriad ways. This work delves into the multifaceted nature of patriotism through the lenses of war, as portrayed in the poignant short stories "How to Tell a True War Story" and "Soldiers Home." Within these narratives, we unravel the complexities of patriotism, witnessing its evolution and profound impact on those who navigate the harsh landscapes of conflict.
The protagonists of both stories, Krebs in ""Soldiers Home"" and the unnamed narrator in ""How to Tell a True War Story,"" initially embody an intense sense of patriotism that propels them into the military.
Their decision to enlist stems from a fervent belief in fighting for the freedom and ideals of their nation, setting the stage for a common thread that runs through their respective journeys.
As we navigate their pre-war experiences, it becomes evident that this surge of patriotism serves as a driving force. Krebs, with a nationalistic view before World War I, fervently believes that Americans should fight to safeguard the freedoms of the United States.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Patriotism
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
Similarly, the narrator in ""How to Tell a True War Story"" is portrayed as a true patriot, deeply connected to the emotions associated with the Vietnam War.
This shared commitment to patriotism serves as a foundation, a unifying force that draws them into the throes of war. Their decision to lay down their lives for their country echoes the famous words of a former president: ""Ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country.""
Parallel to their initial patriotism, both stories reveal a profound transformation in the main characters after confronting the grim realities of war.
The events, such as witnessing gruesome deaths and experiencing the brutality of combat, shatter their preconceived notions. Krebs, unable to pray and the narrator resorting to weaving fictional tales, highlight the disillusionment with the harsh truth of war. The need to shield others from the grim reality becomes a coping mechanism, fundamentally altering their perception of patriotism.
The aftermath of war is etched across their souls. Krebs, scarred by the atrocities he witnessed, finds himself unable to partake in a simple act of prayer with his mother. The sacredness of such moments has been tarnished by the indelible images of war, leaving a void in his spirit. In ""How to Tell a True War Story,"" the narrator grapples with the unspoken understanding that the real truth about war is unwelcome. Society, it seems, is not ready to confront the raw, unfiltered narrative of the battlefield.
The narrators in both stories emphasize the reluctance of society to confront the true horrors of war. Krebs, isolated by the inability to share his genuine experiences, and the narrator's acknowledgment that no one wants to listen to the real truth underscore the societal aversion to the harsh realities of conflict. The burden of patriotism becomes intertwined with the burden of keeping the painful truths hidden.
In the intricate web of lies and half-truths, the characters find themselves isolated from their communities. The narrator, keenly aware that the town prefers embellished stories over actualities, feels the weight of unspoken expectations. Similarly, Krebs, yearning to share his authentic experiences at the neighborhood bar, faces a disinterested audience craving glorified narratives from fellow veterans. The isolation imposed by societal aversion leaves them grappling with the true essence of patriotism.
As the dust of war settles, significant differences emerge in the post-war patriotism of Krebs and the narrator from ""How to Tell a True War Story."" While Krebs manages to retain a sense of patriotism, as evidenced by the picture he carries, the narrator appears to have abandoned it completely. The loss of response to a heartfelt letter and the sister's rejection of the truth exemplify the narrator's detachment from the patriotic sentiments he once held.
Krebs, despite the tumultuous changes within himself, clings to a semblance of his former patriotic self. The picture, a tangible relic from his past, serves as a poignant reminder of the pride that still lingers within him. On the contrary, the narrator's disillusionment reaches a point where even the act of reaching out to a fallen comrade's sister results in silence. The unacknowledged letter becomes a metaphor for the societal dismissal of the harsh realities of war, stripping away the last vestiges of the narrator's post-war patriotism.
In juxtaposition, Krebs returns home to a world that seems to have forgotten the patriotism that once surged through the nation. The lack of celebration upon his return from World War I echoes a sentiment observed in recent history—the fading of public patriotism after significant events. The aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attack, marked by a surge of flags and fervor, eventually dissipated over time, highlighting the ephemeral nature of nationalistic fervor.
The transient nature of patriotism comes under scrutiny as we navigate the contrasting experiences of soldiers and the shifting tides of public sentiment. The post-9/11 surge of patriotism, marked by a sea of American flags, eventually receded as the nation moved forward. The once-visible symbols of unity gradually faded, leaving observers to ponder the fleeting nature of collective patriotic fervor.
Krebs' disappointment with the lack of a hero's welcome upon his return serves as a microcosm of a broader societal phenomenon—the ebbing of patriotism with the passage of time. This prompts readers to reflect on their own experiences, drawing parallels between the soldiers' journey and the collective memory of a nation. How does one grapple with the fleeting nature of patriotism, and is it an inherent part of the human condition?
In conclusion, this exploration of patriotism through the lens of war unravels the intricate interplay between personal experiences, societal expectations, and the evolving nature of nationalistic sentiments. As readers navigate the contrasting journeys of Krebs and the narrator, they are invited to ponder the enduring question—what does patriotism truly mean in the face of war?
The answer lies in individual reflection. We are prompted to evaluate their patriotism from the perspective of soldiers who face the harsh realities of combat daily. The juxtaposition of personal beliefs and societal dynamics becomes a lens through which one can scrutinize the multifaceted nature of patriotism and its significance in contemporary times.
In essence, this extended exploration of patriotism serves as a call to action—a call to question, understand, and redefine our connection to the notion of love for one's country. Wilfred Owen's quote, ""Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori,"" lingers in the air, challenging readers to ponder the sweetness and fittingness of dying for one's country.
"
The Dynamics of Patriotism: A Comparative Analysis. (2016, Jun 21). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/patriotism-in-the-military-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
