Argumentative Essay on Cannabis

Cannabis, a widely used substance globally, is sourced from the cannabis plant, which traces its evolution to the eastern Tibetan Plateau around 28 million years ago. Despite its historical roots dating back 2500 years, the debate over its legalization remains contentious. Presently legal in 15 states but criminalized in 35, cannabis, also known as hemp or marijuana, sparks diverse opinions. This paper delves into the existing perspectives and advocates for federal legalization due to its medical and recreational advantages, along with a potential reduction in law enforcement costs.

A primary argument against cannabis legalization is its categorization as "the most commonly used addictive drug after tobacco and alcohol" (National Institute on Drug Abuse 4). With over 22 million Americans using marijuana monthly, concerns arise about addiction and its impact on cognitive functions, especially in middle age (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention para. 1, 2; Auer et al. 352).

Research suggests a strong correlation between cannabis addiction and diminished verbal memory, executive function, and brain processing speed (Auer et al.

Get quality help now

WriterBelle

Verified writer

Proficient in: Addiction

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

352), fueling concerns about potential societal consequences post-legalization. However, juxtaposing this argument, it is noteworthy that tobacco and alcohol, despite being legalized, do not universally lead to addiction. Furthermore, a 2021 survey by the Pew Research Center reveals that 91 percent of American adults support marijuana legalization for both medical and recreational purposes (Schaeffer para. 2).

Adding depth to the discussion, Keyhani et al.'s survey indicates that over 80 percent of adults perceive marijuana as beneficial in managing pain, treating various conditions, and alleviating mental health issues (282). Notably, respondents express awareness of the associated risks, including legal problems, addiction, and memory issues (Keyhani et al.

282). This indicates that the majority of American citizens are informed and prepared to shoulder responsibility for their actions post-cannabis legalization.

In conclusion, the discourse around cannabis legalization is multifaceted, encompassing concerns about addiction and cognitive impacts. However, a growing consensus among the public recognizes the potential benefits of cannabis for medical and recreational use. The nuanced understanding exhibited by citizens suggests that a legalized framework could allow for responsible use, aligning with the evolving perspectives on cannabis in contemporary society.

Opposing the legalization of cannabis, one prevalent argument asserts that it serves as a gateway drug, suggesting that prolonged marijuana use may drive individuals toward more potent substances like heroin or cocaine. Originating in the 1970s, the marijuana gateway hypothesis has sparked ongoing debates within academic circles. Despite this, studies, including one by the US Department of Justice, indicate a lack of "scientific support for cannabis use leading to harder illicit drug use" (Nöel and Wang 11). Consequently, the fear of increased addiction to hard drugs post-legalization may be unfounded.

However, the addictive nature of marijuana cannot be overlooked. Legalization might indeed result in a surge of cannabis addiction, as individuals in states where marijuana is prohibited may be more inclined to experiment without fear of legal repercussions. This potential influx of addiction could manifest in more traffic accidents, increased instances of teenagers stealing cannabis from their parents, and identity card forgery. The spike in emergency room visits and demand for addiction treatment could also strain hospitals, posing risks to those who abstain from cannabis use.

Yet, legalization carries the promise of enhancing safety for existing cannabis users. By curbing illegal cannabis trade, users can be assured of the product's quality, alleviating concerns associated with street purchases. Legalization further empowers the government to regulate the entire production chain, from cultivation to laboratory testing, ensuring stringent quality controls. Imposing age restrictions through legalization becomes a viable means of preventing immature individuals from abusing the substance.

Crucially, the legalization of cannabis stands to significantly reduce law enforcement costs. In 2018 alone, the US witnessed "663,000 arrests for marijuana-related offenses," incurring an annual cost of approximately $4 million to the federal government (Gramlich para. 2). By legalizing marijuana, law enforcement resources could be redirected toward addressing more pressing and hazardous issues, offering a cost-effective and pragmatic approach to policing priorities.

In conclusion, the allure of forbidden fruit often enhances its perceived sweetness, a phenomenon well-known in the realm of marijuana use. Those inclined to smoke cannabis will inevitably find a means to procure it, while individuals prioritizing their well-being through alternative stress-relief practices like yoga, meditation, or jogging are unlikely to embrace cannabis use. However, the legalization of marijuana holds the potential to alleviate the lives of those grappling with severe pains and diverse medical conditions. Furthermore, legalization promises significant economic savings and more efficient resource allocation. Undoubtedly, cannabis usage carries its share of adverse effects, yet the principle of individual autonomy should empower people to make independent decisions about their lives, weighing the pros and cons of engaging in the cannabis game.

Expanding on the concluding thoughts, the notion of forbidden fruit and its allure plays a pivotal role in the complex landscape of marijuana legalization. It's a well-established psychological phenomenon that when something is prohibited or restricted, the desire for it often intensifies. In the case of marijuana, those inclined towards its use may indeed find ways to obtain it, driven by the allure of its forbidden nature. However, this underscores the importance of individual agency and the need for society to balance regulation with personal autonomy.

Within the spectrum of choices for stress relief, it's essential to recognize that individuals maintain diverse preferences and coping mechanisms. While some may opt for marijuana, others might choose healthier alternatives such as yoga, meditation, or jogging. The legalization debate acknowledges the diversity of these preferences and seeks a balanced approach that respects individual choices while ensuring public safety.

One of the most compelling arguments in favor of marijuana legalization revolves around its potential to bring relief to those grappling with severe pain and various medical conditions. Medical marijuana has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating symptoms associated with chronic pain, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and other debilitating conditions. Legalization not only provides access to potential therapeutic benefits but also opens avenues for further research into the medical applications of cannabis.

Economically, the legalization of marijuana carries the promise of substantial savings and more efficient resource utilization. Redirecting law enforcement efforts away from cannabis-related offenses can free up resources to address more pressing issues, enhancing the overall efficiency of policing. Moreover, the legal cannabis industry has the potential to generate significant tax revenues, contributing to public coffers and funding various societal needs.

It's crucial to acknowledge that, like any substance, cannabis usage comes with inherent risks and adverse effects. From potential cognitive impairment to addiction concerns, a nuanced understanding of these drawbacks is vital in shaping responsible usage patterns. However, the principle of individual freedom underscores the belief that individuals should have the autonomy to decide for themselves, weighing the potential risks against perceived benefits.

In the ongoing discourse on marijuana legalization, finding a middle ground that respects individual choices, prioritizes public health, and optimizes resource allocation is paramount. Striking this delicate balance ensures that society can navigate the complex terrain of cannabis use, acknowledging its potential benefits while mitigating associated risks. Ultimately, the decision to engage in the "cannabis game" should be one made through informed choice, where individuals are empowered to shape their lives responsibly within the bounds of a legalized framework.