Critical Analysis of My Leadership Style

1. Leadership Style Evaluation

Leadership is a multifaceted concept, and there exist various leadership styles. After engaging with the assigned literature, I undertook a series of assessments to gain insights into my personal leadership style. These assessments helped me recognize and define my leadership approach. The assessments I completed included the Emotional Expressive Scale, Personal Magnetism Deficit Inventory, Task Oriented Attitudinal and Behavior assessment, Clarifying your Work Values, What Style of Leader are you or would you be, What is your propensity for taking Risk, How Flexible are you, the Least Preferred Co-worker Scale for Measuring Leadership style, and Measuring your Situation and Perspective assessments.

Upon completion of these assessments, I identified my leadership style as Participative.

A Participative leader shares decision-making authority with group members, fostering a collaborative approach to leadership (DuBrin, A. (2010). Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills (6th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning. ISBN-13: 9780547143965).

1.1 Strengths

Participative leadership emphasizes teamwork, which is a significant strength of this style. Promoting teamwork allows team members to actively participate in decision-making processes, empowering them and fostering a sense of belonging within the team.

Get quality help now
WriterBelle
WriterBelle
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Business

star star star star 4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

This collaborative approach can lead to enhanced creativity and shared ownership of outcomes.

Another notable strength of the Participative leadership style is its inclination towards consensus-building. Seeking consensus within a team empowers employees and cultivates a greater sense of unity and shared responsibility. When team members feel that their voices are heard and their opinions valued, it can contribute to a positive work environment and improved morale.

1.2 Weaknesses

However, the Participative leadership style does have its weaknesses.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

Decision-making can be prolonged if team members fail to reach a consensus, causing potential delays in projects or processes. This delay in decision-making can lead to inefficiencies, impacting productivity and resource allocation.

Furthermore, there is the risk of time wastage if consensus cannot be reached within a reasonable timeframe. Valuable work hours may be lost while waiting for agreement among team members, which can hinder progress and results.

2. Comparison of Leadership Styles

While Participative leadership is my personal style, I found the Autocratic Leadership Style and Entrepreneurial Leadership Style to be particularly intriguing.

The Autocratic Leadership Style is characterized by the leader retaining most of the decision-making authority (DuBrin, A. (2010)). In contrast to the Participative style, where decision-making involves team members and management approval, Autocratic leaders have sole control. They are typically less concerned with the input and concerns of team members.

The Entrepreneurial Leadership Style, on the other hand, emerges from individual personality traits and circumstances. It is often associated with individuals who possess the innovation and drive to establish and operate their own businesses. This style differs significantly from Participative leadership. Entrepreneurial leaders tend to be highly creative, enthusiastic, and responsive to crises.

2.1 Contrasts Between Leadership Styles

Comparing these styles, the primary distinction lies in decision-making authority. Autocratic leaders maintain centralized control, making decisions independently, while Participative leaders involve team members in the decision-making process. The Autocratic style is less concerned with employee input, whereas Participative leaders actively seek the opinions and concerns of their team members.

The Entrepreneurial Leadership Style stands out for its emphasis on innovation and creativity. While Participative leaders often seek consensus and may negotiate employee demands, Entrepreneurial leaders are more likely to respond immediately to crises and pursue innovative solutions. This style thrives on adaptability and quick decision-making.

3. Leadership Style Discussions

Understanding various leadership styles can enhance my effectiveness as a leader by enabling me to identify areas of improvement within my personal style. Recognizing deficiencies within my leadership approach is the first step toward self-awareness, allowing me to acquire new skills and refine areas that need development. This heightened self-awareness equips me with the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to become an effective leader.

Furthermore, exploring diverse leadership styles fosters creativity and innovative thinking within my own leadership approach. Exposure to different styles encourages me to think outside the box, resulting in a more dynamic and adaptable leadership style. This adaptability enables me to continually improve and refine my approach, ultimately enhancing my effectiveness as a leader.

Additionally, understanding various leadership styles allows me to comprehend different learning styles, which, in turn, enhances my communication skills. Effective communication is crucial in leadership, and the ability to adapt my communication style to resonate with employees with diverse learning styles can significantly improve my leadership effectiveness.

3.1 Overcoming Challenges

To minimize challenges in the workplace, leaders must possess emotional intelligence, a deep understanding of their personal leadership style, and familiarity with various leadership styles. A lack of such awareness can lead to miscommunication and a decrease in employee morale.

To address these challenges, leaders should hold regular meetings to encourage employee input, establishing an open-door policy to demonstrate accessibility and willingness to listen to team members. This approach can improve workplace communication and employee morale.

Moreover, leaders can enhance employee morale by taking the time to know their employees personally. This personal connection fosters a sense of appreciation and belonging within the organization, resulting in improved communication and higher morale. Additionally, organizing team-building activities, such as employee luncheons and picnics, can further boost employee morale and strengthen team cohesion.

4. Synergies

Understanding and appreciating different leadership styles can create several advantages, including enhanced collaboration, increased enthusiasm, and confident decision-making.

The ability to collaborate effectively with team members allows for the exchange of ideas and expertise, leading to more comprehensive solutions. Collaboration fosters a sense of shared ownership and mutual respect among team members, ultimately improving overall productivity.

Enthusiasm in the workplace can be contagious. Leaders who exhibit enthusiasm inspire their team members to be more motivated and engaged in their roles. This heightened enthusiasm contributes to a positive work environment and increased productivity.

Confident decision-making empowers leaders to make sound choices promptly. This self-assurance streamlines processes, prevents delays, and enhances organizational efficiency. When leaders are confident in their decisions, they can effectively manage employee performance and contribute to higher levels of productivity.

4.1 Increasing Productivity

The ability to acquire knowledge and skills from team members can significantly boost productivity. When employees are confident in their roles and have a sense of ownership over their work, they tend to be more productive. Enthusiastic employees are motivated to excel in their tasks, leading to improved productivity and overall performance.

Fostering an open-door policy and building personal connections with employees can also enhance productivity. When employees feel valued and appreciated, they are more likely to be committed and dedicated to their work. Team-building activities further contribute to a positive work environment, increasing employee satisfaction and, consequently, productivity.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding and evaluating one's leadership style is a fundamental step towards becoming an effective leader. Through assessments and self-reflection, I have identified my personal leadership style as Participative, which emphasizes collaboration, teamwork, and consensus-building. While this style has its strengths, including empowerment and unity among team members, it also presents challenges, such as potential decision-making delays and time wastage.

Comparing my leadership style to others, such as the Autocratic and Entrepreneurial styles, has highlighted the diversity of leadership approaches. Autocratic leaders retain decision-making authority, while Entrepreneurial leaders thrive on innovation and quick responses to crises. These comparisons have deepened my understanding of leadership and encouraged me to think creatively within my own style.

Understanding different leadership styles offers several advantages, including improved collaboration, increased enthusiasm, and confident decision-making. Collaborative efforts lead to comprehensive solutions, enthusiasm fosters motivation, and confidence streamlines decision-making processes, ultimately enhancing productivity.

To overcome challenges in the workplace, leaders must possess emotional intelligence, know their leadership style, and understand various leadership approaches. Implementing strategies such as open communication, personal connections, and team-building activities can mitigate issues like miscommunication and low morale, ultimately contributing to a more productive and harmonious work environment.

In the ever-evolving landscape of leadership, continuous self-awareness, and a willingness to adapt and learn from various styles are essential for becoming an effective leader. By embracing these principles and leveraging the synergies between leadership styles, leaders can navigate challenges, inspire their teams, and drive success in their organizations.

Updated: Jan 17, 2024
Cite this page

Critical Analysis of My Leadership Style. (2016, Apr 21). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/my-leadership-style-analysis-essay

Critical Analysis of My Leadership Style essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment