24/7 writing help on your phone
Save to my list
Remove from my list
American jury system is a unique thing; not every country in the world has something like that. That’s why a question appears. Is the American jury system still a good idea if not anyone goes after it?
Generally, what’s that? It is a group of citizens (always different from case to case) which hears testimony in legal disputes and make a decision based on what do they think is the truth.
American jury system could be very helpful, as well as cause damage because of making wrong decisions in serious cases.
A good example of that is the situation with OJ Simpson. He stated that he did not kill his ex-wife Nicole, and even wore the gloves which were found on the place of murder and said they did not fit his hands, in contrast to the prosecution’s evidence pointing towards the fact that he may have. Because there was (and usually is) conflicting evidence, they must decide exactly what happens.
During the presentation of evidence, the prosecution made many serious and huge mistakes which confused the issues and led to additional doubt in the minds of the jurors. After the evidence was brought in, the question presented to the jury was, in essence, “Did OJ Simpson kill Nicole Simpson?” When the government is trying a record in the United States, they must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime occurred. If they fail to do that, the person goes free. They did their job and decided that the State did not prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that OJ Simpson killed Nicole.
Yes, didn’t prove, and his fleeing from justice, police, the process when he hid the bag with gloves and murder weapon didn’t say to the jury that he was guilty. Moreover, DNA testing wasn’t 100% evidence those days, people simply didn’t believe in its truth.
But we can’t judge by this one event. How many bad guys are now under arrest thanks to the American jury system?
Without it, it would be unfair to listen to what one person (judge) thinks. We suppose, there are three main reasons why the system should stay even now.
It serves an important purpose: to decide what took place. That is known technically as the “finder of fact.” Without the system, all of the power would be placed in judges, who would make both legal decisions and factual decisions. While this happens when the parties admit to it, a group of six to twelve normal people can weigh the credibility of the evidence and the witnesses perfectly than just one.
Here we have a few more reasons why Americans like their jury system, and that it works well and even emotionally.
What does work well?
What doesn’t work well but is accepted by the American concept of a jury:
To sum it up, we can say that - yes, looking at all the examples we see that the jury system isn’t perfect. But the reality is, it tends to work quite well. The press makes a big deal, and people are shocked and outraged because it is rare that cases like that of OJ Simpson exist. We have to believe that we are protected, it is essential to feel yourself in safety for all of us, so let’s believe that everything will be alright, and it really will be.
Is the America Jury System still a Good Idea?. (2016, Aug 17). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/is-the-america-jury-system-still-a-good-idea-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment