To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The primary objective of this study is to explore and analyze the phenomena of the Primacy and Recency effects in memory recall. These effects pertain to the propensity of individuals to remember items from the beginning and end of a list, respectively, more effectively than those in the middle. This investigation builds upon the seminal research of Glanzer and Cunitz conducted in 1966, which proposed that introducing an interference task could virtually eliminate the Recency effect.
Our hypothesis posits that when participants are tasked with recalling a list of words following the imposition of an interference task, a significant Primacy effect will be observed, while the Recency effect will be greatly diminished.
Conversely, when the interference task is not employed, we anticipate the presence of both Primacy and Recency effects.
The Primacy effect is characterized by a superior recall of items from the beginning of a list, constituting approximately the first 25% of the items. This effect is primarily attributed to the rehearsal process, as individuals tend to rehearse and encode the initial items more extensively compared to those in the middle of the list.
Conversely, the Recency effect denotes a higher recall rate for items presented towards the end of the list, comprising the last 25%.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Human
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
This effect is attributed to the retention of these items in the short-term memory store, owing to their recent presentation. Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) made a significant contribution by demonstrating that an interference task, such as counting backward for a mere 10 seconds after the list presentation, can virtually eliminate the Recency effect. This interference task disrupts the memory consolidation process, erasing the memory of items presented at the end of the list while leaving the rest unaffected.
We hypothesize that, when participants are presented with a list of words for memorization, followed by the imposition of an interference task, they will exhibit a robust Primacy effect, alongside a substantially diminished Recency effect. This one-tailed hypothesis is based on existing research findings that support the existence of the Primacy effect and the elimination of the Recency effect in the presence of an interference task. Conversely, in the absence of interference, we anticipate both the Primacy and Recency effects to be present.
Our null hypothesis posits that when participants are presented with a list of words for memorization, involving an interference task, there will be no significant difference in the strength of the Primacy and Recency effects.
The study comprised two groups of participants, each consisting of 20 individuals, totaling 40 participants in all. The participants were selected from a pool of 'A' level students aged between 16 and 18. It is worth noting that some of these students possessed prior knowledge of psychology, potentially impacting their awareness of the investigation's nature and influencing their behavior during the experiment.
The research design employed in this study is that of independent measures. The primary variables under investigation are 'word number' and the total number of times each word is recalled by the participants.
The participants in Group A were presented with a list of words for memorization. Following this, an interference task involving counting backward for 10 seconds was introduced. Subsequently, they were asked to recall the words from the list.
Conversely, Group B participants underwent a similar process but without the interference task. They were presented with a list of words, instructed to memorize them, and then asked to recall the words.
The data collected from both groups were subjected to statistical analysis to assess the presence and strength of the Primacy and Recency effects. The number of words correctly recalled from the beginning and end of the list was compared to determine the existence and magnitude of these effects.
The findings from our investigation revealed a notable disparity between the two groups. In Group A, where participants were subjected to an interference task, a conspicuous Primacy effect was observed. Participants exhibited a considerably higher recall rate for words at the beginning of the list compared to those in the middle. In contrast, the Recency effect in Group A was markedly diminished, indicating that the interference task effectively disrupted the retention of words presented at the end of the list.
Conversely, in Group B, where the interference task was omitted, both the Primacy and Recency effects were evident. Participants exhibited a superior recall rate for words at both the beginning and end of the list, with a noticeable dip in recall for words in the middle.
Our study underscores the significant impact of interference tasks on the Primacy and Recency effects in memory recall. The results align with Glanzer and Cunitz's (1966) findings, as the imposition of an interference task effectively eliminated the Recency effect while accentuating the Primacy effect.
These outcomes can be elucidated through the multi-store model of memory, posited by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). The Recency effect primarily relies on short-term memory, with recent items being retained temporarily. The interference task disrupts the rehearsal process, causing these recent items to fade from memory. Conversely, items presented at the beginning of the list, associated with the Primacy effect, benefit from extended rehearsal and are stored in long-term memory, rendering them less susceptible to interference.
This investigation has shed light on the intricate dynamics of memory recall, particularly the influence of interference tasks on the Primacy and Recency effects. Our findings underscore the robust nature of the Primacy effect, which remains resilient even in the presence of an interference task. In contrast, the Recency effect is highly susceptible to disruption, vanishing when interference tasks are introduced.
Understanding these effects contributes to a more comprehensive comprehension of memory processes and highlights the malleability of human memory under different conditions. Further research in this area can provide additional insights into the nuances of memory recall and its susceptibility to interference.
The Primacy and Recency Effects in Memory Recall: a Research. (2017, Oct 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/investigate-into-the-primacy-and-recency-effect-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
