To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Global increase of nations wealth imposes constant improvement of development throughout the years and well known architectural forms, both visually and functionally. This forces the necessity to search for slenderer horizontal shell elements with greater spans. However, apart from general stability and capacity, those have to provide both good thermal and acoustical features, as well as vibration resistance, which become problematic in case of slender slabs. Despite number of disadvantages, all of the above mentioned factors may be reconciled by concrete, more precisely - prestressed concrete.
Quite large span is achieved using pre-tensioned hollow core slabs.
The use of hidden steel beams and concrete topping significantly increases the attractiveness of this type of slab. The flat slab with large span is achieved in this way. However, much more slander slabs can be constructed using post-tensioned concrete. For years, post-tensioned concrete long-span slabs have been used as structural floors in buildings in the USA, Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore. Hereafter, they have been introduced to Europe.
In Poland, its growth dates back to the last ten years. During several decades of effective application of prestressed slabs many design guidelines were prepared and implemented in order to enable the simple engineering approach to the design of selected slab type.
Prestressed concrete is a revolutionary method of building technique in which high strength steel cables are stressed before or after placing concrete so that this force balances the external force. Prestressed concrete is used in a wide range of building and civil structures where its improved performance can allow for longer spans, reduced structural thicknesses, and material savings compared with simple reinforced concrete.
Typical applications include high-rise buildings, residential slabs, foundation systems, bridge and dam structures, silos and tanks, industrial pavements and nuclear containment structures. Post-tensioning systems provide many benefits.
Use of post-tensioning in slabs reduces the amount of concrete required for a structure which offsets increased cost of labour and equipment, decreases the amount of formwork required, decreases the overall height of floors which allows more floors for a specified building height, decreases the weight of the building which is a benefit in seismic design, and increases the allowable span length, creating more open space in a structure.
In this paper the authors have discussed on long span posttensioned slabs and deflection control. The following paper presents representative projects of realized and future designs of long span prestressed slabs. It has been proven, with regard to two-year monitoring behaviour of slabs constructed in Kozienice, that design of elements exceeding values recommended by dated guidelines, of span lengths and span to depth ratios is feasible. The conclusions that have been made, will allow for the construction of longer span and slenderer slabs than it was in the past. he authors will continue to successively observe effects of future long span prestressed slabs designs and report the findings in technical and scientific literature.
It can be noted that the research of possibility to use lightweight aggregate concrete in construction of long-span post-tensioned slabs has begun in Cracow University of Technology. It is commonly known that it is difficult to provide the desired concrete modulus of elasticity with this type of aggregate. On the other hand, preliminary computational analysis carried out by the authors indicate that important decrease of slab self-weight can lead to reduction of amount of prestressing or deflection in comparison with dense concrete of similar strength. The successful results from observation of full-scale post-tensioned slabs in laboratory tests may contribute to design and realisation of long-span post-tensioned slab with lightweight aggregate in buildings in the future.
The behaviour of unbonded post-tensioned one-way concrete slabs is investigated experimentally and numerically in this paper. Two tests were conducted by the authors to measure the strains in the tendon during the post-tensioning stage and during the ultimate load test. The slabs were one-way simply-supported and reinforced with 15.7 mm nominal diameter seven-wire mono-strand tendons. Prestress losses were measured and a comparison with current design codes showed that the calculated design losses were higher than those measured. The load-deflection behaviour and modes of failure are presented for the two tests. A nonlinear finite element model, incorporating the correct load transfer from the tendon to the concrete, was developed and reified against the tests.
The model also ensured that the profile of the tendon retained its correct shape during deformation. A parametric study was conducted to study the effects on the global structural behaviour due to the change in the slab's geometry, prestress load, concrete strength and boundary conditions. The experimental and numerical results were compared with values calculated using current design codes. It is shown that the ultimate loads calculated using current codes are conservative for the unbonded post-tensioned one-way concrete slabs investigated in this study.
Post tensioned one way continuous slab consists of two spans of 7.5m wide and 20 m long panels which are acted upon by dead load and 3Kn/m2 live load for an industrial building. The slab is supported by three beams of size 450mmX750mm at the longer edges.
Thickness of the slab = span/40=7500/40=187.5 =200mm
Self-weight of the slab= 0.2x24 = 4.8Kn/m2
Live load on the slab= 3 Kn/m2
Floor finish = 1 Kn/m2
Total Dead load = 5.8 Kn/m2
Factored dead load = 5.8x1.5 = 8.7 Kn/m2
Factored live load = 3x1.5 = 4.5 Kn/m2
Effective span is smaller of
Effective span = 7.7m
Referring to Is 456-2000 table 12 Bending moment coefficients
Bending moment at mid span = (8.7x7.72x/12) + (4.5x7.72/10)
= 69.66 KN-m
Bending moment at mid support = (8.7x7.72x/10) + (4.5x7.72/9)
= 81.2273 KN-m
Bending moment diagram
The absolute maximum bending moment occurs at the mid support section. Using a minimum cover of 30mm to the cable, if no tensile stresses are permitted in the section the distance between the cable and the bottom of the kern is obtained as 70+33.3=103.3mm
P= prestressing force
Px103.3 = 81.22x106
P=786KN
At support = M/P = 81.22x106 /786x103 = 103.3mm
Therefore eccentricity of the cable at support = 103.3-(h/6) =70mm
At mid span= M/P = 69.x106 /786x103 = 88.6mm
Therefore eccentricity of the cable at support = 88.6-(h/6) =55mm
Considering 1m width of span
Area of cross section = 1000x200=200x103mm2
Z= section modulus = 1000x2002/6 =6.66x106 mm3
P=786KN
At centre of span section
e=55mm; M=69.66 KN-m
P/A=786x103/(1000x200)=3.93N/mm2
Pe/Z= (786x103x55)/( 6.66x106)=6.49 N/mm2
M/Z = 10.459 N/mm2
At mid support section
e=70mm; M=81.22 KN-m
P/A=786x103/(1000x200)=3.93N/mm2
Pe/Z= (786x103x70)/( 6.66x106)=8.26 N/mm2
M/Z = 12.19 N/mm2
Using 12 wires of 5 mm diameter stressed to 1500N/mm2
Area of each cable= 235.6mm2
Force in each cable=235.6x1500=353.4KN
Total prestressing force required for 20m span =786x20=15720KN
Number of cables = 15720/353.4=45
Spacing of cable= 20x103/45 = 440mm
Provide 12 wires of 5mm diameter cables at 440mm centre to centre at an eccentricity of 55mm at centre and concentric at external support and at an eccentricity of 70mm at mid support.
Check for limit state of collapse
M= fpu Ap (d-0.42Xu)
Apfp/bdfck =534.8x1500/(1000x170x40)=0.117
fpu/0.87fp =1 fpu=1305N/mm2
xu/d=0.2823 xu=48mm
M=1305x534.8x(170-0.42x50)
M=104.576 KN-m > 81.22 KN-m hence safe.
Check for deflection
Deflection at centre of the span due to dead and live load = 5wl4/384EI
I=6.66x108 mm4, Ec=5000 =31622 Mpa
W=8.8Kn/m
=17.21mm downward
Deflection due to prestressing force =5Pel2/48EI
Prestressing force per metre width of span=803.18 KN
Deflection=12.29 mm Upward
Net deflection at centre of span = 17.21-12.29 = 4.92mm
Deflection limit = span /250 =7500/250=30mm>4.92 Hence safe
Minimum reinforcement requirement
According to IS 1343-1980 provide a minimum longitudinal reinforcement of 0.2% of cross section.
10mm@195mm c/c along shorter and longer direction.
ANSYS Workbench combines access to ANSYS applications with utilities that manage the product workflow.Applications that can be accessed from Workbench include: ANSYS DesignModeler (for geometry creation); ANSYS Meshing (for mesh generation); ANSYS Polyflow (for setting up and solving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, where viscous and viscoelastic flows play an important role); and ANSYS CFD-Post (for postprocessing the results). In Workbench, a project is composed of a group of systems.
Ansys slab analysis gives the following Bending stress in the centre span and support section.
Centre of span= 9.90Mpa
Support section=12.819 Mpa
Using relation M/I=f/y
Moment at centre span= (I/y)*f = (6.66*10^6)9.9=66 KN
Moment at support section= (I/y)*f = (6.66*10^6)12.819=85.37 KN
Analysis and Design of One Way Post Tensioned Slab Using Ansys. (2024, Feb 20). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/document/analysis-and-design-of-one-way-post-tensioned-slab-using-ansys
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment