To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
A journey into the intricate world of a courtroom unfolded on a Wednesday afternoon, commencing at 2:00 and extending until approximately 4:35. The court proceedings, however, commenced a bit later than scheduled, fostering an atmosphere of casual conversations among attendees. My observation was shared with only one other individual, a classmate, creating an intimate connection to the unfolding trial.
Prior to the return of the jury, attorneys engaged in preliminary discussions, attempting to align their positions. Lacking the context of the trial's inception, I found myself in a state of uncertainty regarding the nature of the dispute and the litigants involved.
Subsequently, after resolving preliminary matters and establishing a visual aid in the form of a map, the jury re-entered for the closing arguments.
The focal point of the trial lay in a dispute between Guge, proprietor of the Exxon on 105 extension, and the state over compensation for a property subject to confiscation for construction. The state proposed $60,000, while Guge sought a substantial $300,000. The legal discourse began with Guge's attorney monopolizing the floor for an extended period, exceeding an hour.
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
The verbosity of his argument led to the inadvertent somnolence of some jurors and even the presiding judge. Judge Johnston, seemingly unimpressed, briefly departed during this lengthy discourse. Guge's attorney, undeterred, seized the opportunity for a final address after McKinney, the state's attorney, succinctly presented his case.
Post-closing arguments, the judge inquired about the jury's need for a break, which was duly granted.
During this intermission, a juror expressed her inability to continue due to illness, prompting her dismissal. The first alternate juror seamlessly filled the vacancy, while the second alternate was excused. As proceedings resumed, Judge Johnston delivered instructions to the jury, a phase met with visible disinterest from the bench.
The deliberation process began, with the courtroom engulfed in anticipation. An interesting interlude transpired as the attorneys for Guge seized the opportunity to solicit my perspective on the case. Their inquiry into potential juror sentiments provided a unique postscript to the courtroom experience. Reflecting on the closing arguments, I found myself inclined to favor the state's proposition, primarily due to the protracted nature of Guge's attorney's address, which left me with reservations regarding his case.
In conclusion, the courtroom experience proved to be a fascinating exploration into the nuances of legal proceedings. From the intricacies of pre-trial discussions to the theatrics of closing arguments and the jury's subsequent deliberation, every facet illuminated the complex interplay within the justice system. The dispassionate demeanor of Judge Johnston, juxtaposed with the contrasting styles of the attorneys, underscored the diverse elements at play in a legal setting.
As I departed the courtroom, the unresolved deliberation hung in the air, leaving an indelible mark on my understanding of the legal process. The dynamics witnessed during this courtroom odyssey shed light on the delicate balance between eloquence and conciseness, ensuring a fair and impartial administration of justice.
The Dynamics of a Courtroom Experience. (2020, Jun 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/court-experience-new-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
